Shredded Girl with Balloon - One Big Fraud

[Gentle Mental]

May 29, 2021 0:29:57 GMT 1 Gentle Mental said:

Ok letting my Girl With Balloon with PC COA go at cost. £85 - fees and ship excluded. Thanks.

Sold for £67 shipping fees included! Kaching!
Pity that fool. Ha.

[Sebastian Dusseldorf]

May 28, 2021 23:47:42 GMT 1 Winchester said:

... but it seems like some members here prefer to close their eyes, hope for the best and focus on something else. I looked at it focusing on the things that's being said and I think it was very suspicious and wrong and could be a problem .

It should read "but it seems TO ME...".
Everybody has their individual view. Mine is also seeing a big problem here, so I'll share it with you:
...but it seems like some members here are totally in line with you that the COA in question was tailored for the exhibition, hope for the best and focus on their real lives. You looked at it and repeated the things you said again and again and I think that is very suspicious and wrong and could be a problem.

Please make sure to speak to close friends and family personLly about the conspiracy you are seeing, about all the ignorance you are facing from everbody here and about your fear for your invest and the Billion Dollar Banksy Market as a whole that you want to save. Releasing yourself from that huge burden will probably work wonders.

[Winchester]

May 29, 2021 0:02:44 GMT 1 @voiceofreason said:

May 28, 2021 23:47:42 GMT 1 Winchester said:

All I see is people attacking JPS, that's not what this thread is about.
Take this guy out of the picture,look at the facts and answer the allegations.That was what my first post here was about, but it seems like some members here prefer to close their eyes, hope for the best and focus on something else. I looked at it focusing on the things that's being said and I think it was very suspicious and wrong and could be a problem .

So what's your connection with this all then? I mean your account was created beginning of this month to solely defend this topic. You're not Jo brooks or Robin, are you? lol

You saying I'm obsessed with this is like sitting in a glass house and throwing stones.

[Knowss]

May 28, 2021 18:45:12 GMT 1 Winchester said:

May 28, 2021 18:33:31 GMT 1 Knowss said:

Lol 🤣

Not a very meaningful comment, is it?
you clearly don't own a banksy, otherwise you'd be worried about it all just like I am.

If that accusation is wrong, why is there no statement of the involved parties or any legal actions against jps or the media company? They are usually happy to sue little tiny baby card companies, but now they keep quiet? Fact is, there's an article and serious claims of ongoing fraud and we don't get any answers or responses.

If that all breaks the main media, our investment is ruined and not even worth a penny.

I do. And you keep using the word "investment" lol that's the funny part.

[jstjst]

May 30, 2021 20:48:22 GMT 1 Knowss said:

May 28, 2021 18:45:12 GMT 1 Winchester said:

Not a very meaningful comment, is it?
you clearly don't own a banksy, otherwise you'd be worried about it all just like I am.

If that accusation is wrong, why is there no statement of the involved parties or any legal actions against jps or the media company? They are usually happy to sue little tiny baby card companies, but now they keep quiet? Fact is, there's an article and serious claims of ongoing fraud and we don't get any answers or responses.

If that all breaks the main media, our investment is ruined and not even worth a penny.

I do. And you keep using the word "investment" lol that's the funny part.

If you’re that worried simply sell. This should be an art forum. The art itself was, at the start at least, subversive. That comes with risk ... think about the meaning of the art and you’ve got your answer. LOL.

[Winchester]

May 30, 2021 21:01:43 GMT 1 jstjst said:

May 30, 2021 20:48:22 GMT 1 Knowss said:

I do. And you keep using the word "investment" lol that's the funny part.

If you’re that worried simply sell. This should be an art forum. The art itself was, at the start at least, subversive. That comes with risk ... think about the meaning of the art and you’ve got your answer. LOL.

I no longer view it as an investment, I've one unsigned print and I wouldn't rip someone off by selling it (I can afford it) because it all became worthless to me . This forum is constantly picking out fraud, so why ignore this one? Why back fraud just because it suits our pockets?

[jstjst]

May 30, 2021 21:30:07 GMT 1 stikfan said:

May 30, 2021 21:17:20 GMT 1 Winchester said:

I no longer view it as an investment, I've one unsigned print and I wouldn't rip someone off by selling it (I can afford it) because it all became worthless to me . This forum is constantly picking out fraud, so why ignore this one? Why back fraud just because it suits our pockets?

I’m worried how anxious you’re going to become when you discover that Banksy isn’t even his real name.

Or even one person ... 

[Deleted]

May 30, 2021 21:17:20 GMT 1 Winchester said:

May 30, 2021 21:01:43 GMT 1 jstjst said:

If you’re that worried simply sell. This should be an art forum. The art itself was, at the start at least, subversive. That comes with risk ... think about the meaning of the art and you’ve got your answer. LOL.

I no longer view it as an investment, I've one unsigned print and I wouldn't rip someone off by selling it (I can afford it) because it all became worthless to me . This forum is constantly picking out fraud, so why ignore this one? Why back fraud just because it suits our pockets?

 Jamie it's been explained to you numerous times now that no fraud ever took place.
If you care so much about what is right and what is wrong then you would cease your instagram account activities, (you know what I'm talking about)

[Winchester]

May 30, 2021 21:38:15 GMT 1 @voiceofreason said:

May 30, 2021 21:17:20 GMT 1 Winchester said:

I no longer view it as an investment, I've one unsigned print and I wouldn't rip someone off by selling it (I can afford it) because it all became worthless to me . This forum is constantly picking out fraud, so why ignore this one? Why back fraud just because it suits our pockets?

 Jamie it's been explained to you numerous times now that no fraud ever took place.
If you care so much about what is right and what is wrong then you would cease your instagram account activities, (you know what I'm talking about)

You keep accusing me of being jps and I repeatedly told you that I'm not, I don't even know him but I'm gonna contact him and point him towards this forum and your particular comments as you clearly have a vendetta against this guy that outweighs bare fraud. You look very much involved into all of this to me.

And you still haven't explained your newly made account and then changing your name after I first called you out.

[Winchester]

May 30, 2021 21:30:07 GMT 1 stikfan said:

May 30, 2021 21:17:20 GMT 1 Winchester said:

I no longer view it as an investment, I've one unsigned print and I wouldn't rip someone off by selling it (I can afford it) because it all became worthless to me . This forum is constantly picking out fraud, so why ignore this one? Why back fraud just because it suits our pockets?

I’m worried how anxious you’re going to become when you discover that Banksy isn’t even his real name. Yet more deceit!

Completely unrelated topic, it's not about deceit, it's about illegal activities in an high end auction house.

[Deleted]

May 30, 2021 21:57:37 GMT 1 Winchester said:

May 30, 2021 21:38:15 GMT 1 @voiceofreason said:

 Jamie it's been explained to you numerous times now that no fraud ever took place.
If you care so much about what is right and what is wrong then you would cease your instagram account activities, (you know what I'm talking about)

You keep accusing me of being jps and I repeatedly told you that I'm not, I don't even know him but I'm gonna contact him and point him towards this forum and your particular comments as you clearly have a vendetta against this guy that outweighs bare fraud. You look very much involved into all of this to me.

And you still haven't explained your newly made account and then changing your name after I first called you out.

You don't know him but yet you are very quick to defend him on here 🙄
I will save you the effort of contacting yourself and pointing yourself in the direction of this forum as yourself already seems to be well aware of this forums presence as indicated by your facebook page. 




Also harassing Jo Brooks over instagram probably isn't the smartest thing to do and could even be considered as a crime. Stop complaining to people that she's blocked you when you have been relentlessly harassing her.

I'm not going to post some of the things about what you have been saying or details of the account in question as it's not right and quite disgusting. 




Or have you got your knickers in a twist because she said a piece that you painted wasn't by Banksy? 






You should seriously call it a day now, as your reputation is taking a serious hit and you risk alienating yourself. An apology won't do much to help you but it's probably a good place to start.

[Winchester]

May 30, 2021 22:19:12 GMT 1 @voiceofreason said:

May 30, 2021 21:57:37 GMT 1 Winchester said:

You keep accusing me of being jps and I repeatedly told you that I'm not, I don't even know him but I'm gonna contact him and point him towards this forum and your particular comments as you clearly have a vendetta against this guy that outweighs bare fraud. You look very much involved into all of this to me.

And you still haven't explained your newly made account and then changing your name after I first called you out.

You don't know him but yet you are very quick to defend him on here 🙄
I will save you the effort of contacting yourself and pointing yourself in the direction of this forum as yourself already seems to be well aware of this forums presence as indicated by your facebook page. 




Also harassing Jo Brooks over instagram probably isn't the smartest thing to do and could even be considered as a crime. Stop complaining to people that she's blocked you when you have been relentlessly harassing her.

I'm not going to post some of the things about what you have been saying or details of the account in question as it's not right and quite disgusting. 




Or have you got your knickers in a twist because she said a piece that you painted wasn't by Banksy? 






You should seriously call it a day now, as your reputation is taking a serious hit and you risk alienating yourself. An apology won't do much to help you but it's probably a good place to start.

I only say I'm not him, how do I defend him? I even said he's a p*ick, Ive read the accusations and I defend the opinion that it's a fraud.
again, I don't get why banksys team doesn't react, it's one simple move to sue this guy or make a statement about it all, especially if it all can be "considered as crime".

You seen to be really obsessed with jps and you clearly have a personal vendetta against him, so maybe you should message him instead of bugging me.

Still no answer to my question about your suspicious new registered account and your name change by the way.

[Deleted]

May 30, 2021 22:32:12 GMT 1 Winchester said:

May 30, 2021 22:19:12 GMT 1 @voiceofreason said:

You don't know him but yet you are very quick to defend him on here 🙄
I will save you the effort of contacting yourself and pointing yourself in the direction of this forum as yourself already seems to be well aware of this forums presence as indicated by your facebook page. 




Also harassing Jo Brooks over instagram probably isn't the smartest thing to do and could even be considered as a crime. Stop complaining to people that she's blocked you when you have been relentlessly harassing her.

I'm not going to post some of the things about what you have been saying or details of the account in question as it's not right and quite disgusting. 




Or have you got your knickers in a twist because she said a piece that you painted wasn't by Banksy? 






You should seriously call it a day now, as your reputation is taking a serious hit and you risk alienating yourself. An apology won't do much to help you but it's probably a good place to start.

I only say I'm not him, how do I defend him? I even said he's a p*ick, Ive read the accusations and I defend the opinion that it's a fraud.
again, I don't get why banksys team doesn't react, it's one simple move to sue this guy or make a statement about it all, especially if it all can be "considered as crime".

You seen to be really obsessed with jps and you clearly have a personal vendetta against him, so maybe you should message him instead of bugging me.

Still no answer to my question about your suspicious new registered account and your name change by the way.

Jamie. This needs to stop, for fucks sake man. 
For my own sanity I'm no longer going to engage with you. 
It's seriously not helping your career and what your doing could be seen as a form of criminal harassment.

You can seriously do so much better than this.

[peas]

May 30, 2021 22:19:12 GMT 1 @voiceofreason said:

Or have you got your knickers in a twist because she said a piece that you painted wasn't by Banksy? 

Translation:

Provincial newspaper gets wind of piss-poor new street stencil and asks Jo Brooks if it's by Banksy.

Jo Brooks says 'it's not Banksy'.

The end.

[iamzero]

I’m interested in buying your unsigned Banksy for £100. At this price I can assure you I won’t feel ripped off so you can rest easy. Does it have Pest Control COA?

[Chris JL]

May 30, 2021 22:19:12 GMT 1 @voiceofreason said:

Sounds a lot like Narcissistic Personality Disorder…

[Slipped Crown]

May 30, 2021 22:19:12 GMT 1 @voiceofreason said:

May 30, 2021 21:57:37 GMT 1 Winchester said:

You keep accusing me of being jps and I repeatedly told you that I'm not, I don't even know him but I'm gonna contact him and point him towards this forum and your particular comments as you clearly have a vendetta against this guy that outweighs bare fraud. You look very much involved into all of this to me.

And you still haven't explained your newly made account and then changing your name after I first called you out.

You don't know him but yet you are very quick to defend him on here 🙄
I will save you the effort of contacting yourself and pointing yourself in the direction of this forum as yourself already seems to be well aware of this forums presence as indicated by your facebook page. 




Also harassing Jo Brooks over instagram probably isn't the smartest thing to do and could even be considered as a crime. Stop complaining to people that she's blocked you when you have been relentlessly harassing her.

I'm not going to post some of the things about what you have been saying or details of the account in question as it's not right and quite disgusting. 




Or have you got your knickers in a twist because she said a piece that you painted wasn't by Banksy? 






You should seriously call it a day now, as your reputation is taking a serious hit and you risk alienating yourself. An apology won't do much to help you but it's probably a good place to start.

So the entire rant is about how nobody is giving him the attention he wants. Jesus, maybe if the art wasn't so shite...

[artdelight]

Ok guys enough

[moron]

May 10, 2021 10:44:17 GMT 1 nina79 said:

On the 5th October 2018 Banksy’s Balloon Girl captured the world’s attention. As the hammer went down at auction house Sotheby’s on the £860,000 piece, we watched in astonishment as the Balloon Girl began to shred. Many called it a ‘stunt’; a wonderful piece of marketing. Others questioned how this could have happened and cried ‘fake’.

One person who felt this was all a little dubious is street artist JPS who is adamant that something very fishy went on that day and has been continuing ever since. Claims of back dated artworks and false certificates of authenticity (COAs) by Pest Control are at the centre of this ongoing controversy.


We spoke directly to JPS to find out more about what is going on with Banksy and Sotheby’s…

“The starting point for me was the infamous shredder stunt. Although both Banksy and Sotheby’s strenuously deny being in cahoots (because that would be illegal), I firmly believe both parties were in on the stunt. But, putting the whole ‘how did the shredder frame make it past security’ type questions to one side, the bigger issue for me is that I believe the piece was falsely dated by 12 years”, explains JPS.

According to JPS, the alleged record breaking piece was not a 2006 Balloon Girl at all but a falsely dated newer version of the famous artwork. The timeline below, given to us by JPS, shows why he believes this is the case:




As you can see from the timeline, the 2006 version marked with a red dot is clearly a lot crisper than its 2005 and 2007 counterparts. In fact it would be fair to say that it is more alike to the later 2017 and 2020 versions.

If JPS is in fact correct, the infamous work. now residing in a German museum on permanent loan, was therefore purchased with a false back dated history.

Sotheby’s Alex Branczik made a statement attempting to quash any claims of wrong doing by stating that the piece wasn’t a 2006 work at all but a brand new 2018 version and yet at the time the hammer went down it had been sold as a 2006 work.



And it didn’t stop there…

JPS also claims that the next part of the Balloon Girl puzzle was brought to his attention when Banksy bought a rescue boat and the Balloon Girl appeared on the side of it.




“After seeing the version on the side of the boat and comparing it to the alleged 2006 one I am positive it was back dated, also in the 3 days after this, Banksy’s Instagram account grew from 1.8m to over 6m and once again his prices began breaking records. In 2017 Balloon Girl was voted the most popular piece of UK art and I firmly believe this is why this fresh faced version appeared at Sotheby’s ”, said JPS.

In 2020, to make a point of his frustration, JPS created a piece of art titled ‘Outta Time’ which featured his own version of Banksy’s Balloon Girl holding a COA and stood next to a Back to the Future DeLorean.




At this point, it would be very easy to simply accuse JPS of just being bitter and a little jealous of Banksy’s fame but, as JPS put it, “I feel people are being ripped off and lied to. If Banksy and Sotheby’s are fabricating histories for these pieces then buyers are investing huge sums of money into false works. If Pest Control are issuing certificates of authenticity falsely dating pieces by 12 years then how can they have any credibility?”

JPS believes that the Balloon Girl stunt in 2018 was just the beginning of a sophisticated operation between Banksy and Sotheby’s where new works are given a back dated history and COA and urges potential buyers to look closely, ask questions and think twice before investing.

When JPS first approached us with his findings we found it all a little overwhelming to be honest, but, when you look at the timeline you can understand why questions are being asked, and if this does have a false history, questions about other works start to be raised.

As we’ve said in previous articles, when huge sums of money are at stake who knows what people are capable of.

Before writing this article JPS stated that he contacted Banksy, Sotheby’s and Banksy’s PR agent Jo Brooks regarding the accusation… he heard nothing.

Some fair points raised.

  "Sotheby’s Alex Branczik made a statement attempting to quash any claims of wrong doing by stating that the piece wasn’t a 2006 work at all but a brand new 2018 version and yet at the time the hammer went down it had been sold as a 2006 work."

 After the stunt Banksy posted a video where he stated that he had built the shredder into the picture frame holding the picture 12 years ago. Which implied that the artwork in the frame auctioned at Sotheby's was created at least 12 years ago.

   The whole thing was a stunt and Sotheby's are in the business of making a profit for their share holders.

Sotheby's loaned some dodgy art dealer 60 million years ago to push up the prices of Chagalls at auction and create a market for Chagall, whose prices had stagnated. The dealer never paid the money back to Sothebys which was funny and it was all hushed up.

  Sotheby's got caught selling stolen antiquities a few years ago too and even arranged a private sale to a collector, selling him an ancient Egyptian black basalt statue for 160K which turned out to have been made from cast cement with black pigment in it.

  Peter Nahum when he was Sotheby's head of art department was buying fakes from Myatt and Drewe and re selling them via Christies auction house for a big profit. Nahum stated that he did not know they were fakes at the time.

   Sotheby's will never admit any knowledge of Banksy's stunt as to do so would lose them credibility as a a top tier auction house. Gentlemen do not partake in cheap gimmicks and stunts to gain publicity. I wouldn't be surprised if the shredding the picture at auction was a recent idea by team Banksy and a few people were involved in it which may or may not have included the buyer and at least one person on the inside at Sotheby's.

[My Name is Frank]

Six pages of this, so in short Banksy puts print in auction which was not old, it has shredder in, live stunt happens (perfomance art) and almost certainly sothebys in on it, but deny it.

And?

[met]

May 10, 2021 10:44:17 GMT 1 nina79 said:

On the 5th October 2018 Banksy’s Balloon Girl captured the world’s attention. As the hammer went down at auction house Sotheby’s on the £860,000 piece, we watched in astonishment as the Balloon Girl began to shred. Many called it a ‘stunt’; a wonderful piece of marketing. Others questioned how this could have happened and cried ‘fake’.

One person who felt this was all a little dubious is street artist JPS who is adamant that something very fishy went on that day and has been continuing ever since. Claims of back dated artworks and false certificates of authenticity (COAs) by Pest Control are at the centre of this ongoing controversy.


We spoke directly to JPS to find out more about what is going on with Banksy and Sotheby’s…

“The starting point for me was the infamous shredder stunt. Although both Banksy and Sotheby’s strenuously deny being in cahoots (because that would be illegal), I firmly believe both parties were in on the stunt. But, putting the whole ‘how did the shredder frame make it past security’ type questions to one side, the bigger issue for me is that I believe the piece was falsely dated by 12 years”, explains JPS.

According to JPS, the alleged record breaking piece was not a 2006 Balloon Girl at all but a falsely dated newer version of the famous artwork. The timeline below, given to us by JPS, shows why he believes this is the case:




As you can see from the timeline, the 2006 version marked with a red dot is clearly a lot crisper than its 2005 and 2007 counterparts. In fact it would be fair to say that it is more alike to the later 2017 and 2020 versions.

If JPS is in fact correct, the infamous work. now residing in a German museum on permanent loan, was therefore purchased with a false back dated history.

Sotheby’s Alex Branczik made a statement attempting to quash any claims of wrong doing by stating that the piece wasn’t a 2006 work at all but a brand new 2018 version and yet at the time the hammer went down it had been sold as a 2006 work.



And it didn’t stop there…

JPS also claims that the next part of the Balloon Girl puzzle was brought to his attention when Banksy bought a rescue boat and the Balloon Girl appeared on the side of it.




“After seeing the version on the side of the boat and comparing it to the alleged 2006 one I am positive it was back dated, also in the 3 days after this, Banksy’s Instagram account grew from 1.8m to over 6m and once again his prices began breaking records. In 2017 Balloon Girl was voted the most popular piece of UK art and I firmly believe this is why this fresh faced version appeared at Sotheby’s ”, said JPS.

In 2020, to make a point of his frustration, JPS created a piece of art titled ‘Outta Time’ which featured his own version of Banksy’s Balloon Girl holding a COA and stood next to a Back to the Future DeLorean.




At this point, it would be very easy to simply accuse JPS of just being bitter and a little jealous of Banksy’s fame but, as JPS put it, “I feel people are being ripped off and lied to. If Banksy and Sotheby’s are fabricating histories for these pieces then buyers are investing huge sums of money into false works. If Pest Control are issuing certificates of authenticity falsely dating pieces by 12 years then how can they have any credibility?”

JPS believes that the Balloon Girl stunt in 2018 was just the beginning of a sophisticated operation between Banksy and Sotheby’s where new works are given a back dated history and COA and urges potential buyers to look closely, ask questions and think twice before investing.

When JPS first approached us with his findings we found it all a little overwhelming to be honest, but, when you look at the timeline you can understand why questions are being asked, and if this does have a false history, questions about other works start to be raised.

As we’ve said in previous articles, when huge sums of money are at stake who knows what people are capable of.

Before writing this article JPS stated that he contacted Banksy, Sotheby’s and Banksy’s PR agent Jo Brooks regarding the accusation… he heard nothing.

May 30, 2021 22:19:12 GMT 1 @Deleted said:

May 30, 2021 21:57:37 GMT 1 Winchester said:

You keep accusing me of being jps and I repeatedly told you that I'm not, I don't even know him but I'm gonna contact him and point him towards this forum and your particular comments as you clearly have a vendetta against this guy that outweighs bare fraud. You look very much involved into all of this to me.

And you still haven't explained your newly made account and then changing your name after I first called you out.

You don't know him but yet you are very quick to defend him on here 🙄
I will save you the effort of contacting yourself and pointing yourself in the direction of this forum as yourself already seems to be well aware of this forums presence as indicated by your facebook page. 




Also harassing Jo Brooks over instagram probably isn't the smartest thing to do and could even be considered as a crime. Stop complaining to people that she's blocked you when you have been relentlessly harassing her.

I'm not going to post some of the things about what you have been saying or details of the account in question as it's not right and quite disgusting. 




Or have you got your knickers in a twist because she said a piece that you painted wasn't by Banksy? 






You should seriously call it a day now, as your reputation is taking a serious hit and you risk alienating yourself. An apology won't do much to help you but it's probably a good place to start.

One possibility I still haven't fully discounted is that the above quotes and posts attributed to JPS / Jamie Paul Scanlon are all fake.

They could be part of an elaborate false flag operation, designed to make the artist look like an envious and resentful tit.

Indeed, JPS's apparent self-awareness deficit seems exaggeratedly suspicious to me. Perhaps nefarious actors are (for whatever reason) trying to discredit him — by giving us the false impression he truly is behaving in a manner comparable to that of an obsessively unhinged, scorned lover.

If this were the case, then JPS would be the innocent victim here of character defamation. He would deserve our sympathy, regardless of how poor his artwork happens to be.

[Terry Fuckwitt]

What are your thoughts about this thread and some of the accusations bigp?

[BANK OF ENGLAND 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿]

Jun 12, 2021 12:47:36 GMT 1 met said:

One possibility I still haven't fully discounted is that the above quotes and posts attributed to JPS / Jamie Paul Scanlon are all fake.

They could be part of an elaborate false flag operation, designed to make the artist look like an envious and resentful tit.

Indeed, JPS's apparent self-awareness deficit seems exaggeratedly suspicious to me. Perhaps nefarious actors are (for whatever reason) trying to discredit him — by giving us the false impression he truly is behaving in a manner comparable to that of an obsessively unhinged, scorned lover.

If this were the case, then JPS would be the innocent victim here of character defamation. He would deserve our sympathy, regardless of how poor his artwork happens to be.

I throw my weight behind this theory. This is most likely a manufactured psyop designed to discredit JPS because of his superior stencil cutting abilities. Nefarious agents have put into action a perfectly executed plan to defame JPS by creating numerous instagram pages and facebook accounts to discredit JPS and portray him as a nonsensical flat earth conspiracy theorist nutcase to end his art career. 

The real JPS cannot speak out against injustice because Team Banksy have conspired with the entire global media to silence JPS and block any press coverage of his superior stencil work. 

Did you know JPS inspired: Better out than in, The Walled Off Hotel, Banksy vs Bristol Museum and Turf War. 
One day the entire world will know the truth and Sotheby's will be caught with their pants down and will have no choice but to stop auctioning Banksy's work as a result of this fraud. JPS will then be called upon by the art-world protectors of the realm for his bravery and will be asked to step up and take his rightful seat as the greatest artist of all time. 

[Winchester]

Jun 12, 2021 15:30:32 GMT 1 BANK OF ENGLAND 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 said:

Jun 12, 2021 12:47:36 GMT 1 met said:

One possibility I still haven't fully discounted is that the above quotes and posts attributed to JPS / Jamie Paul Scanlon are all fake.

They could be part of an elaborate false flag operation, designed to make the artist look like an envious and resentful tit.

Indeed, JPS's apparent self-awareness deficit seems exaggeratedly suspicious to me. Perhaps nefarious actors are (for whatever reason) trying to discredit him — by giving us the false impression he truly is behaving in a manner comparable to that of an obsessively unhinged, scorned lover.

If this were the case, then JPS would be the innocent victim here of character defamation. He would deserve our sympathy, regardless of how poor his artwork happens to be.

I throw my weight behind this theory. This is most likely a manufactured psyop designed to discredit JPS because of his superior stencil cutting abilities. Nefarious agents have put into action a perfectly executed plan to defame JPS by creating numerous instagram pages and facebook accounts to discredit JPS and portray him as a nonsensical flat earth conspiracy theorist nutcase to end his art career. 

The real JPS cannot speak out against injustice because Team Banksy have conspired with the entire global media to silence JPS and block any press coverage of his superior stencil work. 

Did you know JPS inspired: Better out than in, The Walled Off Hotel, Banksy vs Bristol Museum and Turf War. 
One day the entire world will know the truth and Sotheby's will be caught with their pants down and will have no choice but to stop auctioning Banksy's work as a result of this fraud. JPS will then be called upon by the art-world protectors of the realm for his bravery and will be asked to step up and take his rightful seat as the greatest artist of all time. 

At least with the end you seem to be right.
You should comment with your main profile by the way, reader, having an account solely to diss JPS and to mock people suffering from addiction and illnesses (see other thread) is ridiculous. Do it at least under your main account (and now don't come up with the theory that I've several accounts bs - checking my IP the admins will see its unique)


As it's been said several times in this thread, it's not about who outed it, it's about the facts - and it seems because nobody can deny the allegations, everyone attacks the person who made them. I said it here before, let's look away from who outed it to what has been outed.

[BANK OF ENGLAND 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿]

Jun 12, 2021 15:44:02 GMT 1 Winchester said:

Jun 12, 2021 15:30:32 GMT 1 BANK OF ENGLAND 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 said:

I throw my weight behind this theory. This is most likely a manufactured psyop designed to discredit JPS because of his superior stencil cutting abilities. Nefarious agents have put into action a perfectly executed plan to defame JPS by creating numerous instagram pages and facebook accounts to discredit JPS and portray him as a nonsensical flat earth conspiracy theorist nutcase to end his art career. 

The real JPS cannot speak out against injustice because Team Banksy have conspired with the entire global media to silence JPS and block any press coverage of his superior stencil work. 

Did you know JPS inspired: Better out than in, The Walled Off Hotel, Banksy vs Bristol Museum and Turf War. 
One day the entire world will know the truth and Sotheby's will be caught with their pants down and will have no choice but to stop auctioning Banksy's work as a result of this fraud. JPS will then be called upon by the art-world protectors of the realm for his bravery and will be asked to step up and take his rightful seat as the greatest artist of all time. 

At least with the end you seem to be right.
You should comment with your main profile by the way, reader, having an account solely to diss JPS and to mock people suffering from addiction and illnesses (see other thread) is ridiculous. Do it at least under your main account (and now don't come up with the theory that I've several accounts bs - checking my IP the admins will see its unique)


As it's been said several times in this thread, it's not about who outed it, it's about the facts - and it seems because nobody can deny the allegations, everyone attacks the person who made them. I said it here before, let's look away from who outed it to what has been outed.

"At least with the end you seem to be right."

Looking through your comment history the other week you called JPS a "p*rick* when somebody accused you of being him? Now you are throwing your weight behind the concept of him being hailed as the greatest artist of all time!

[Winchester]

Jun 12, 2021 15:59:17 GMT 1 BANK OF ENGLAND 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 said:

Jun 12, 2021 15:44:02 GMT 1 Winchester said:

At least with the end you seem to be right.
You should comment with your main profile by the way, reader, having an account solely to diss JPS and to mock people suffering from addiction and illnesses (see other thread) is ridiculous. Do it at least under your main account (and now don't come up with the theory that I've several accounts bs - checking my IP the admins will see its unique)


As it's been said several times in this thread, it's not about who outed it, it's about the facts - and it seems because nobody can deny the allegations, everyone attacks the person who made them. I said it here before, let's look away from who outed it to what has been outed.

"At least with the end you seem to be right."

Looking through your comment history the other week you called JPS a "p*rick* when somebody accused you of being him? Now you are throwing your weight behind the concept of him being hailed as the greatest artist of all time!

Well I was just saying this because the focus was on him all the time and I got fed up with this. I wanted to get the focus back on the topic that's being displayed. Dissing JPS till the sun goes down doesn't change the allegations. Just because JPS outed it,doesn't mean it's not relevant.


Did you even read what else I was writing?
You've 8 posts in this forum since you registered a few hours ago and all of them are dissing either JPS or AK47. Both known rivals of banksy. So have at least the bottle and do it with your main account Reader.

[BANK OF ENGLAND 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿]

Jun 12, 2021 16:07:16 GMT 1 Winchester said:

Jun 12, 2021 15:59:17 GMT 1 BANK OF ENGLAND 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 said:

"At least with the end you seem to be right."

Looking through your comment history the other week you called JPS a "p*rick* when somebody accused you of being him? Now you are throwing your weight behind the concept of him being hailed as the greatest artist of all time!

Well I was just saying this because the focus was on him all the time and I got fed up with this. I wanted to get the focus back on the topic that's being displayed. Dissing JPS till the sun goes down doesn't change the allegations. Just because JPS outed it,doesn't mean it's not relevant.


Did you even read what else I was writing?
You've 8 posts in this forum since you registered a few hours ago and all of them are dissing either JPS or AK47. Both known rivals of banksy. So have at least the bottle and do it with your main account Reader.

Just because JPS outed it,doesn't mean it's not relevant.

JPS hasn't outed anything. There is no conspiracy and nobody is cock-blocking JPS's career other than JPS himself and his bizarre proxy accounts that have just mindlessly been rambling on about spilt milk for over a year now.

"All of them are dissing either JPS or AK47, Both known rivals of banksy"
I made one remark that I thought AK47 was not a reliable source of province and think it's slightly concerning that he's one step away from issuing DIY Steve Lazarides style COA's. What most people don't realise is that it wasn't stealing the Drinker that pissed Banksy off. It was the fact that when *unknown persons* took it back from him he went and filed a police report and told the authorities that he had been burgled. 
 

[Winchester]

Jun 12, 2021 16:22:27 GMT 1 BANK OF ENGLAND 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 said:

Jun 12, 2021 16:07:16 GMT 1 Winchester said:

Well I was just saying this because the focus was on him all the time and I got fed up with this. I wanted to get the focus back on the topic that's being displayed. Dissing JPS till the sun goes down doesn't change the allegations. Just because JPS outed it,doesn't mean it's not relevant.


Did you even read what else I was writing?
You've 8 posts in this forum since you registered a few hours ago and all of them are dissing either JPS or AK47. Both known rivals of banksy. So have at least the bottle and do it with your main account Reader.

Just because JPS outed it,doesn't mean it's not relevant.

JPS hasn't outed anything. There is no conspiracy and nobody is cock-blocking JPS's career other than JPS himself and his bizarre proxy accounts that have just mindlessly been rambling on about spilt milk for over a year now.

"All of them are dissing either JPS or AK47, Both known rivals of banksy"
I made one remark that I thought AK47 was not a reliable source of province and think it's slightly concerning that he's one step away from issuing DIY Steve Lazarides style COA's. What most people don't realise is that it wasn't stealing the Drinker that pissed Banksy off. It was the fact that when *unknown persons* took it back from him he went and filed a police report and told the authorities that he had been burgled. 
 

Anyway, I'm not talking to a newly built account that was solely created to diss people or make fun of addiction anymore.
Log into your main account, grow up and realize that more than just one person cares about that fraud.

[Reader]

Jun 12, 2021 16:07:16 GMT 1 Winchester said:

Jun 12, 2021 15:59:17 GMT 1 BANK OF ENGLAND 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 said:

"

So have at least the bottle and do it with your main account Reader.

ha, only one account here my dear. Not my style. I don't have a horse in this race to the bottom. I've met JPS, seemed like a decent enough chap, nothing to add, he sent me the GWB case, didn't think it relevant or interesting. That's the end of my involvement, like most everyone, I hadn't given it as second thought until it appeared on here. We're at the nexus of collectors and artists, so there's bound to be some OCD, ADHD, characters, disorders and attention seekers. Par for the course. Self awareness often slips in mania phases, nothing wrong with that. But when literally EVERYONE points something out, it's probably time to put the kettle on and step away from the laptop for a while.

[jimbofatz]

May 30, 2021 22:10:18 GMT 1 Winchester said:

May 30, 2021 21:30:07 GMT 1 stikfan said:

I’m worried how anxious you’re going to become when you discover that Banksy isn’t even his real name. Yet more deceit!

Completely unrelated topic, it's not about deceit, it's about illegal activities in an high end auction house.

She is the sweetest and best banksy but the guy center stage is 3D.