[Deleted]

Would make quite a nice tea towel

[Eastend Boy 13]

Launching this afternoon....

[benjamayn]

I like her style, and most of her prints, but I would never pay that much money for it. It’s way too overpriced imo.

[kfroms]

Price at 2,200 gbp at the moment.
The discount code is KB2020

[Art for Love 1]

how do you know it 2200 it not launch till 2 pm i was told it 1500

[kfroms]

Sept 17, 2020 11:28:11 GMT 1 Art for Love 1 said:

how do you know it 2200 it not launch till 2 pm i was told it 1500

Prices increase as they sell out

eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.countereditions.com%2Foffers%2Ftoucan-2020-new-release%2Ftoco-toucan-tocano-2020.html&data=02%7C01%7C%7C83d714808126413f673308d85a250311%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637358462305225264&sdata=xfjMt5EMEsWFIEcqt16T0r%2Fkr9PKiDI5uOIIvIYlMJU%3D&reserved=0

[theclash]

I like this one a lot. Just bought it with the discount. 

[cest]

Gross

[Eastend Boy 13]

2800 now....

[ignition0]

Katherine Bernhardt

Pink (2019)

Edition of 65

7 Colour lithographic print on Somerset Tub Sized Satin Radiant White 410 gsm.
Produced by Counter Studios, Margate

129 x 83 cm (50.8 x 32.7 in)

Signed, numbered and dated by the artist

Serious offers considered

[joech]

Dm me

[Ravnur 2020]

artforchange.com/products/coco-frio-2020-signed-and-numbered-by-katherine-bernhardt?variant=37711073444010

[Amber Halo]

Despite the good cause, have to think those will sit for a while.

[Anthony Styles]

small edition and not a bad print tbh

[rbt]

Terrible image. Pass.

[John The Badgers]

Thanks for posting Ravnur, not a huge fan, but this I like.

[ignition0]

BUMP

[irl1]

Counter Editions Katherine Bernhardt

2 New Prints | Launching Thursday 8th April and Thursday 15th April

Counter Editions is pleased to announce two new prints by Katherine Bernhardt. Printed in our Margate studio, each these hand-pulled lithographs will be in a limited edition of 75.

Follow @countereditions on Instagram for updates.

www.countereditions.com/eu/?

[njr911]

I'll probably get shot for saying this but... I don't really get Katherine Bernhardt

[Everyone Owes]

I'll second that

[ak1]

And a third. Don't get Bernhardt. Shrigley is another one.

[LJCal]

Her work is colourful and fun but not something I’d have on my wall and not worth the money people pay in my view

[Runit]

Lemme guess. Another daft pink panther?

[blerd]

Mar 19, 2021 23:13:10 GMT 1 LJCal said:

Her work is colourful and fun but not something I’d have on my wall and not worth the money people pay in my view

I don't own any of her prints, but why do you think they aren't worth the money? I've never understood this when referring to Art that inherently has no intrinsic value. 

Would you say Banksy, George Condo, Julie Curtiss, Kathrine Bradford, Stik or any artist are worth what people pay?

NB. genuine question not wishing to argue. 

[Jimini Cricket]

From a painter's pov, the composition isn't considered and the execution is weak. Super lazy style.

[tonys]

Looking at the ET prints at £4k, only 10 of the 50 have been sold plus other works not selling out I’m just surprised that they are still new editions being released.

[theclash]

I have some of her works for the kids. They love them as they are fun and inspiring but I paid a small fraction of the final / current price. It is a strange pricing process. I do agree, somewhat strange they are bringing more of her works given the inventory they hold rather than other artists. I am also a fan of some of Shrigley’s and Emin’s works and would have rather seen more of them or some new artists.

[blerd]

Mar 20, 2021 8:44:54 GMT 1 Jimini Cricket said:

From a painter's pov, the composition isn't considered and the execution is weak. Super lazy style.

don't give up your day job. 

[LJCal]

Mar 20, 2021 8:37:54 GMT 1 blerd said:

Mar 19, 2021 23:13:10 GMT 1 LJCal said:

Her work is colourful and fun but not something I’d have on my wall and not worth the money people pay in my view

I don't own any of her prints, but why do you think they aren't worth the money? I've never understood this when referring to Art that inherently has no intrinsic value. 

Would you say Banksy, George Condo, Julie Curtiss, Kathrine Bradford, Stik or any artist are worth what people pay?

NB. genuine question not wishing to argue. 

It’s a subjective view obviously and ultimately people frequently get it wrong (me 100% included), but I tend to ask the question will an artist still be relevant in 20 or 50 years time and will there works still be on display in major museums, I think 2-3 of the artists you have named would probably fall into a similar bracket as her.

[artylang]

damn find another artist to make prints with, her work is awful serialized trash for people who collect handbags