[frax]

Mar 28, 2021 3:09:44 GMT 1 Those aren’t pillows said:

Mar 28, 2021 2:07:20 GMT 1 frax said:

There is currently a Homeworks available on Catawiki:

www.catawiki.de/l/45969865-invader-1969-homeworks

However, beware. For me, this print looks suspicious. I am looking for a Homeworks print for quite some time now but have never seen a signed print that is numbered twice (bottom left and next to the signature)...!?

All unsigned prints that I know have the number on the bottom left in the POW blind stamp. For the signed prints, the blind stamp is empty and the number is only next to the signature.

So here, the signature might have been added to an originally unsigned print.

So I won‘t go for it and keep searching... Too bad.

POW were quite serendipitous and never held itself it the high esteem that others now seem to bestow upon it.
They were (very) often susceptible to human error.
Do not assume that every edition from POW was uniform.
Do not also assume that all signed editions from POW were signed by the artists themselves.
Follow your instincts. I have an opinion on the print but I’m not buying so I will hold my counsel.

Thanks for your remarks. Of course, this might explain such a rare case of double-numbered prints... I have seen about 15-20 signed and unsigned Homeworks prints. None of them had two signatures. Also the number of this print is in the middle of the edition (50/100 or 60/100 from the pictures) and I have seen signed/unsigned prints above and below that haven't shown this issue. So, therefore I have my doubts. Anyways, I defintely might be wrong and the buyer will receive a beautiful, immaculate new print in mint condition... But I will be waiting for the next opportunity.

[frax]

Mar 28, 2021 4:29:21 GMT 1 dmm8878 said:

Mar 28, 2021 2:07:20 GMT 1 frax said:

There is currently a Homeworks available on Catawiki:

www.catawiki.de/l/45969865-invader-1969-homeworks

However, beware. For me, this print looks suspicious. I am looking for a Homeworks print for quite some time now but have never seen a signed print that is numbered twice (bottom left and next to the signature)...!?

All unsigned prints that I know have the number on the bottom left in the POW blind stamp. For the signed prints, the blind stamp is empty and the number is only next to the signature.

So here, the signature might have been added to an originally unsigned print.

So I won‘t go for it and keep searching... Too bad.

I'm not seeing it numbered twice...? It's only numbered next to the signature, which I believe is how this one was done. Yes, POW usually numbered them inside their stamp, but in this case, that would be on the image, which is probably why it was numbered this was by the signature.

My post was related to the print in the Catawiki link, not to the pictures of the thread... Sorry for the confusion.

[dmm8878]

Ah, gotcha. Agreed, that is strange.

[frax]

Mar 28, 2021 9:07:00 GMT 1 frax said:

Mar 28, 2021 3:09:44 GMT 1 Those aren’t pillows said:

POW were quite serendipitous and never held itself it the high esteem that others now seem to bestow upon it.
They were (very) often susceptible to human error.
Do not assume that every edition from POW was uniform.
Do not also assume that all signed editions from POW were signed by the artists themselves.
Follow your instincts. I have an opinion on the print but I’m not buying so I will hold my counsel.

Thanks for your remarks. Of course, this might explain such a rare case of double-numbered prints... I have seen about 15-20 signed and unsigned Homeworks prints. None of them had two signatures. Also the number of this print is in the middle of the edition (50/100 or 60/100 from the pictures) and I have seen signed/unsigned prints above and below that haven't shown this issue. So, therefore I have my doubts. Anyways, I defintely might be wrong and the buyer will receive a beautiful, immaculate new print in mint condition... But I will be waiting for the next opportunity.

To finish this topic... Hammer price was 9,005 EUR.

[Saian 74]

Hi all,

only for sell this 3 Invader prints:

Invader "Homework"

Year of release 2006

Unsigned and numbered

ed of 100

dimensions 70cm x 50cm

Framed with Museum Glass, in mint condition

Price 6000€ + shipping

Invader "Jack" Rubik Kubrik II

Year of release 2007

Unsigned and numbered

ed of 300

dimensions 70cm x 50cm

Framed with Museum Glass, in mint condition

Price 4500€ + shipping

Invader "Alex" Rubik Kubrik I

Year of release 2006

Unsigned and numbered

ed of 300

dimensions 70cm x 50cm

Framed with Museum Glass, in mint condition

Price 4500€ + shipping

Preference for a payment with Transfert wise, if it's Paypal you have fees.

I'm based in France.

[Wanchope]

Nicely framed pieces and not bad asking prices!

[Saian 74]

Homework is pending payment.

[Saian 74]

Now Homework is sold.
Alex and Jack still available.

[Saian 74]

Alex still available.

[Saian 74]

Jack and Alex sold.
Pending payment.

[MattWolf]

Anyone looking to part ways with this print? 

[Wanchope]

This one is in Tate ward if that helps
www.artsy.net/artwork/invader-homeworks-signed

[joshcleary]

Yes, I have a framed version I am looking to sell.

[.dappy]

Feb 12, 2022 22:35:59 GMT 1 MattWolf said:

Anyone looking to part ways with this print? 

... I have an unsigned ...

[Daniel Silk]

Nice result for the Invader Homeworks limited edition print at the Phillips auction.

www.phillips.com/detail/invader/UK030222/289

[Ads Army]

Looks cheap but this was not not not not not not not not not not not not not not signed

[Beetle Bum]

I see Tate Ward have a nice signed version coming up.
www.tateward.com/auction/lot/lot-334---invader-french-1969--homeworks-2006/?lot=12639&so=0&st=&sto=0&au=75&ef=&et=&ic=False&sd=0&pp=96&pn=4&g=1

[Brittany's Urban]

Jul 5, 2022 12:41:28 GMT 1 Beetle Bum said:

I see Tate Ward have a nice signed version coming up.
www.tateward.com/auction/lot/lot-334---invader-french-1969--homeworks-2006/?lot=12639&so=0&st=&sto=0&au=75&ef=&et=&ic=False&sd=0&pp=96&pn=4&g=1

Condition Report

In good condition.

Recto: two creases to the upper edge of the sheet, visible in raking light. One additional crease to the upper right-hand corner, only visible in raking light.

Verso: One larger area of skimming to the upper right of the sheet. Areas of skimming and evidence of tab marks from the previous framing to the upper edge of the sheet. Not visible recto. This does not take away from the image as a whole.

This work is currently stored flat in an archival print sleeve.

In good condition.

[Daniel Silk]

Just spotted this Signed Invader Homeworks Print -

www.ebay.co.uk/itm/314134611281

Location Andorra? 🤔

[holberton]

NOW SOLD - thanks for the interest. Mint condition, unframed.signed edition of 100
dm if interested 

[Pint of cockles]

Hi can I get a price


blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah 

thanks in advance 

[Octopus UK]

The Digard auction had one listed with a reservation of €8000 - €12000, but I don't think it sold (the auction wasn't well done, so someone may have wanted it but was unable to bid).