saucyjack
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 197
๐๐ป 74
November 2015
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by saucyjack on Dec 28, 2015 21:51:19 GMT 1, Indeed.
I have it on good authority that this Banksy inspired social and artistic experiment as taken a turn and has become more of a double bluff.
Indeed. I have it on good authority that this Banksy inspired social and artistic experiment as taken a turn and has become more of a double bluff. |
|
saucyjack
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 197
๐๐ป 74
November 2015
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by saucyjack on Dec 28, 2015 21:54:58 GMT 1, To be fair, the use of source material by artists is pretty run of the mill. Banksy uses source material...perhaps even more blatantly than this piece.
To be fair, the use of source material by artists is pretty run of the mill. Banksy uses source material...perhaps even more blatantly than this piece. Banksy tends to wait a little longer than two weeks to appropriate the work of others. This image was first posted by Darussalam on December 15, 2015. |
|
Cornish Crayon
Junior Member
๐จ๏ธ 3,965
๐๐ป 2,902
December 2007
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by Cornish Crayon on Dec 28, 2015 21:57:28 GMT 1, To be fair, the use of source material by artists is pretty run of the mill. Banksy uses source material...perhaps even more blatantly than this piece.ย
I do agree, but it's all in the execution.
To be fair, the use of source material by artists is pretty run of the mill. Banksy uses source material...perhaps even more blatantly than this piece.ย I do agree, but it's all in the execution. |
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by Deleted on Dec 28, 2015 22:07:16 GMT 1, To be fair, the use of source material by artists is pretty run of the mill. Banksy uses source material...perhaps even more blatantly than this piece. Banksy tends to wait a little longer than two weeks to appropriate the work of others. This image was first posted by Darussalam on December 15, 2015.
To be fair, the use of source material by artists is pretty run of the mill. Banksy uses source material...perhaps even more blatantly than this piece. Banksy tends to wait a little longer than two weeks to appropriate the work of others. This image was first posted by Darussalam on December 15, 2015. Source material is one thing, a blatant rip off of another artists work is something quite different. Must be hugely embarrassing to be outed like this. |
|
|
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by Coach on Dec 28, 2015 22:26:52 GMT 1, To be fair, the use of source material by artists is pretty run of the mill. Banksy uses source material...perhaps even more blatantly than this piece.ย
Very different. Banksy uses source photos. But the humour/message etc are not in that source photo, but is in what Banksy does with it. Here the message/joke is the same.
To be fair, the use of source material by artists is pretty run of the mill. Banksy uses source material...perhaps even more blatantly than this piece.ย Very different. Banksy uses source photos. But the humour/message etc are not in that source photo, but is in what Banksy does with it. Here the message/joke is the same. |
|
Fะฏ
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 8,264
๐๐ป 9,252
May 2013
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by Fะฏ on Dec 28, 2015 22:27:14 GMT 1, I dunno, anyone remember the rene gagnone prayer boy? That was very close to the bone timewise as was nola and eelus NEISBAW. Guess it is just the way it is, nothing is 100% original, just like the banksy lovers (with the phones) was sourced on a stock image site. Looking at both of them, i much prefer the JBOY one. Who said it was not done before the cartoonist anyway?
I dunno, anyone remember the rene gagnone prayer boy? That was very close to the bone timewise as was nola and eelus NEISBAW. Guess it is just the way it is, nothing is 100% original, just like the banksy lovers (with the phones) was sourced on a stock image site. Looking at both of them, i much prefer the JBOY one. Who said it was not done before the cartoonist anyway?
|
|
|
|
saucyjack
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 197
๐๐ป 74
November 2015
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by saucyjack on Dec 28, 2015 22:35:28 GMT 1, I dunno, anyone remember the rene gagnone prayer boy? That was very close to the bone timewise as was nola and eelus NEISBAW. Guess it is just the way it is, nothing is 100% original, just like the banksy lovers (with the phones) was sourced on a stock image site. Looking at both of them, i much prefer the JBOY one. Who said it was not done before the cartoonist anyway?
I dunno, anyone remember the rene gagnone prayer boy? That was very close to the bone timewise as was nola and eelus NEISBAW. Guess it is just the way it is, nothing is 100% original, just like the banksy lovers (with the phones) was sourced on a stock image site. Looking at both of them, i much prefer the JBOY one. Who said it was not done before the cartoonist anyway? I don't know if the artist needs you to defend their work with your textbook example of "Tu Quoque," or Appeal to Hypocrisy fallacy. |
|
Fะฏ
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 8,264
๐๐ป 9,252
May 2013
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by Fะฏ on Dec 28, 2015 22:39:30 GMT 1, I dunno, anyone remember the rene gagnone prayer boy? That was very close to the bone timewise as was nola and eelus NEISBAW. Guess it is just the way it is, nothing is 100% original, just like the banksy lovers (with the phones) was sourced on a stock image site. Looking at both of them, i much prefer the JBOY one. Who said it was not done before the cartoonist anyway? I don't know if the artist needs you to defend their work with your textbook example of "Tu Quoque," or Appeal to Hypocrisy fallacy.
I dunno, anyone remember the rene gagnone prayer boy? That was very close to the bone timewise as was nola and eelus NEISBAW. Guess it is just the way it is, nothing is 100% original, just like the banksy lovers (with the phones) was sourced on a stock image site. Looking at both of them, i much prefer the JBOY one. Who said it was not done before the cartoonist anyway? I don't know if the artist needs you to defend their work with your textbook example of "Tu Quoque," or Appeal to Hypocrisy fallacy. Not defending anything, i like the cartoon one as well. But as im into the street art style and modernity i like the finish of the Jboy one. Im sure it will get a response, dont worry about that |
|
saucyjack
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 197
๐๐ป 74
November 2015
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by saucyjack on Dec 28, 2015 22:45:20 GMT 1, I don't know if the artist needs you to defend their work with your textbook example of "Tu Quoque," or Appeal to Hypocrisy fallacy. Not defending anything, i like the cartoon one as well. But as im into the street art style and modernity i like the finish of the Jboy one. Im sure it will get a response, dont worry about that
I am sure the artist appreciates your support. I am also "into the street art style and modernity."
I don't know if the artist needs you to defend their work with your textbook example of "Tu Quoque," or Appeal to Hypocrisy fallacy. Not defending anything, i like the cartoon one as well. But as im into the street art style and modernity i like the finish of the Jboy one. Im sure it will get a response, dont worry about that No? Your definition of "defend" must differ from mine. I am sure the artist appreciates your support. I am also "into the street art style and modernity." |
|
Fะฏ
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 8,264
๐๐ป 9,252
May 2013
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by Fะฏ on Dec 28, 2015 22:49:39 GMT 1, Dont know what your banging on about here. Im just giving you answers to what your are questioning.
Just because you have a loud opinion about this it does not mean you are right. There are more important things to get angry about than little arty bubbles.
Have this conversation with yourself, it will be more entertaining for you! Night
Dont know what your banging on about here. Im just giving you answers to what your are questioning.
Just because you have a loud opinion about this it does not mean you are right. There are more important things to get angry about than little arty bubbles.
Have this conversation with yourself, it will be more entertaining for you! Night
|
|
saucyjack
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 197
๐๐ป 74
November 2015
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by saucyjack on Dec 28, 2015 22:57:35 GMT 1, Dont know what your banging on about here. Im just giving you answers to what your are questioning. Just because you have a loud opinion about this it does not mean you are right. There are more important things to get angry about than little arty bubbles. Have this conversation with yourself, it will be more entertaining for you! Night
I am sure the conversation will continue without you. Perhaps you could take some time this evening to contact the artist, whom you've admittedly worked with in the past, albeit in an IT role, to come here and comment.
Dont know what your banging on about here. Im just giving you answers to what your are questioning. Just because you have a loud opinion about this it does not mean you are right. There are more important things to get angry about than little arty bubbles. Have this conversation with yourself, it will be more entertaining for you! Night Good night FR. I am sure the conversation will continue without you. Perhaps you could take some time this evening to contact the artist, whom you've admittedly worked with in the past, albeit in an IT role, to come here and comment. |
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by Deleted on Dec 28, 2015 23:14:11 GMT 1,
where online?
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by Deleted on Dec 28, 2015 23:18:26 GMT 1, Indeed. I have it on good authority that this Banksy inspired social and artistic experiment as taken a turn and has become more of a double bluff.
It's so easy for anyone to take a media or photographic image off the internet and photoshop it into a stencil these days. To make a stencil from a printout or to make the image into a screen print.
It takes a lot more skill to draw a decent cartoon.
Indeed. I have it on good authority that this Banksy inspired social and artistic experiment as taken a turn and has become more of a double bluff. It's so easy for anyone to take a media or photographic image off the internet and photoshop it into a stencil these days. To make a stencil from a printout or to make the image into a screen print. It takes a lot more skill to draw a decent cartoon. |
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by Deleted on Dec 28, 2015 23:20:50 GMT 1, Not defending anything, i like the cartoon one as well. But as im into the street art style and modernity i like the finish of the Jboy one. Im sure it will get a response, dont worry about that No? Your definition of "defend" must differ from mine. I am sure the artist appreciates your support. I am also "into the street art style and modernity."
Since when has street art been modern?
Stencils have been around for over a hundred years.
Even cave men used stencils and that was thousands of years ago.
Not defending anything, i like the cartoon one as well. But as im into the street art style and modernity i like the finish of the Jboy one. Im sure it will get a response, dont worry about that No? Your definition of "defend" must differ from mine. I am sure the artist appreciates your support. I am also "into the street art style and modernity." Since when has street art been modern? Stencils have been around for over a hundred years. Even cave men used stencils and that was thousands of years ago. |
|
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by Deleted on Dec 28, 2015 23:23:31 GMT 1,
The cartoon by Alfredo Martirena
The cartoon by Alfredo Martirena |
|
saucyjack
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 197
๐๐ป 74
November 2015
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by saucyjack on Dec 28, 2015 23:23:49 GMT 1, Just because someone else did it doesn't make it any more acceptable. Sidenote -Would love to see some of these images banksy blatantly copied by the way. (genuinely). Ripping off someone's work is not acceptable - and I certainly didn't condone that. Not that I'd ever thought I'd be defending J-boy's work - but in the interest of being fair, let's look at this particular case more closely. If this came to a legal dispute over breech of IP/copyright etc, there is enough change in composition of the Darussalam image for J-boy to successfully defend his piece. If you are being critical, you must also judge Banksy's Mobile Lovers by the same yard stick - which was taken from this stock photo: Changing the medium does not take away the fact that the composition is the same. Is the photographer who composed this piece not an artist? Is there a difference in ripping off a professional photographer's work (many whom also consider themselves artists) by turning the exact same image into a stencil?  Look at artists like KAWS work post-ad subversion and pre-abstract...Is he ripping off Schulz? Is Richard Pettibone ripping off Warhol? The discussion should be broadened in order really be a fair one. Finally Darussalam did not come up with this concept - it has been discussed ad nauseum amoungst charity circles and on internet blogs since people started posting selfies of them doing charitable work. I would be interested to know, how many of you, who are critical, have done a literature search to see if this cartoon is indeed original in itself...
In my opinion, much different than an artist's illustration. You obviously disagree. I suggest you research it yourself, as I have. You will see that there is no comparable image which communicates the exact same idea illustrated by the cartoonist for Darussalam.
Once again, because others may have done it previously, does not excuse it. You may evoke Banksy, Kaws, or anyone else if you wish, but this thread is about "Selfie" by the artist JBoy. I simply added an image to provoke thought and discussion on the subject. The consumer will decide if this image is original enough for them to hang on their walls, should this image ever be produced as an edition.
As a side note, I do not recall Banksy spraying the Mobile Lovers image on a canvas and selling it on his website or through a gallery. Apples and oranges, as they say...
Just because someone else did it doesn't make it any more acceptable. Sidenote -Would love to see some of these images banksy blatantly copied by the way. (genuinely). Ripping off someone's work is not acceptable - and I certainly didn't condone that. Not that I'd ever thought I'd be defending J-boy's work - but in the interest of being fair, let's look at this particular case more closely. If this came to a legal dispute over breech of IP/copyright etc, there is enough change in composition of the Darussalam image for J-boy to successfully defend his piece. If you are being critical, you must also judge Banksy's Mobile Lovers by the same yard stick - which was taken from this stock photo: Changing the medium does not take away the fact that the composition is the same. Is the photographer who composed this piece not an artist? Is there a difference in ripping off a professional photographer's work (many whom also consider themselves artists) by turning the exact same image into a stencil? Look at artists like KAWS work post-ad subversion and pre-abstract...Is he ripping off Schulz? Is Richard Pettibone ripping off Warhol? The discussion should be broadened in order really be a fair one. Finally Darussalam did not come up with this concept - it has been discussed ad nauseum amoungst charity circles and on internet blogs since people started posting selfies of them doing charitable work. I would be interested to know, how many of you, who are critical, have done a literature search to see if this cartoon is indeed original in itself... "Stock photography is the supply of photographs, which are often licensed for specific uses. It is used to fulfill the needs of creative assignments instead of hiring a photographer, often for a lower cost. Today, stock images can be presented in searchable online databases. They can be purchased and delivered online." In my opinion, much different than an artist's illustration. You obviously disagree. I suggest you research it yourself, as I have. You will see that there is no comparable image which communicates the exact same idea illustrated by the cartoonist for Darussalam. Once again, because others may have done it previously, does not excuse it. You may evoke Banksy, Kaws, or anyone else if you wish, but this thread is about "Selfie" by the artist JBoy. I simply added an image to provoke thought and discussion on the subject. The consumer will decide if this image is original enough for them to hang on their walls, should this image ever be produced as an edition. As a side note, I do not recall Banksy spraying the Mobile Lovers image on a canvas and selling it on his website or through a gallery. Apples and oranges, as they say... |
|
saucyjack
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 197
๐๐ป 74
November 2015
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by saucyjack on Dec 28, 2015 23:57:12 GMT 1, Yes, I remember the circumstances surrounding the sale of the original Mobile Lovers street piece. I seem to remember the proceeds from the sale benefited the Broad Plain Boys' Club in Bristol.
Yes, I remember the circumstances surrounding the sale of the original Mobile Lovers street piece. I seem to remember the proceeds from the sale benefited the Broad Plain Boys' Club in Bristol.
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by Deleted on Dec 29, 2015 0:00:35 GMT 1, Yes, I remember the circumstances surrounding the sale of the original Mobile Lovers street piece. I seem to remember the proceeds from the sale benefited the Broad Plain Boys' Club in Bristol.
Mobile lovers got Banksy publicity and publicity converts into money.
Yes, I remember the circumstances surrounding the sale of the original Mobile Lovers street piece. I seem to remember the proceeds from the sale benefited the Broad Plain Boys' Club in Bristol. Mobile lovers got Banksy publicity and publicity converts into money. |
|
|
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by Coach on Dec 29, 2015 0:00:41 GMT 1, Very different. Banksy uses source photos. But the humour/message etc are not in that source photo, but is in what Banksy does with it. Here the message/joke is the same. Is the message/joke not in this source photo?
Part if it is, I will grant you.
But not all of it. Another part of the banksy piece is that it's in the dark, and the light from the phones is illuminating the lovers faces.
And from what I've seen of the source photos banksy has used, the vast majority of them are changed hugely to create the message. Applause, Morons, golf sale etc etc.
In a later post you mention the law and precedence. For my own part I'm not talking about the law. I'm referring to my own moral compass.
I accept fr's point that I don't know whether the cartoon came first or not. But I suspect it did, as the impression given was that this was a new Jboy piece. If that's wrong then I apologise.
It is also quite possible that Jboy came up with the idea quite independently, without ever having seen the cartoon. If that's the case, I'm suprised that FR simply didn't say so. I would have accepted that as I have nothing to suggest the contrary.
Very different. Banksy uses source photos. But the humour/message etc are not in that source photo, but is in what Banksy does with it. Here the message/joke is the same. Is the message/joke not in this source photo? Part if it is, I will grant you. But not all of it. Another part of the banksy piece is that it's in the dark, and the light from the phones is illuminating the lovers faces. And from what I've seen of the source photos banksy has used, the vast majority of them are changed hugely to create the message. Applause, Morons, golf sale etc etc. In a later post you mention the law and precedence. For my own part I'm not talking about the law. I'm referring to my own moral compass. I accept fr's point that I don't know whether the cartoon came first or not. But I suspect it did, as the impression given was that this was a new Jboy piece. If that's wrong then I apologise. It is also quite possible that Jboy came up with the idea quite independently, without ever having seen the cartoon. If that's the case, I'm suprised that FR simply didn't say so. I would have accepted that as I have nothing to suggest the contrary. |
|
saucyjack
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 197
๐๐ป 74
November 2015
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by saucyjack on Dec 29, 2015 0:00:59 GMT 1, The cartoon by Alfredo Martirena
Here is the contact info from Alfredo Martirea, should anyone wish to contact him:
martirena@martirena.com
The cartoon by Alfredo Martirena Cheers. Here is the contact info from Alfredo Martirea, should anyone wish to contact him: martirena@martirena.com |
|
|
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by Coach on Dec 29, 2015 0:02:09 GMT 1, Yes, I remember the circumstances surrounding the sale of the original Mobile Lovers street piece. I seem to remember the proceeds from the sale benefited the Broad Plain Boys' Club in Bristol. Mobile lovers got Banksy publicity and publicity converts into money.
Or ........ He donated a piece to charity ....... Again.
Yes, I remember the circumstances surrounding the sale of the original Mobile Lovers street piece. I seem to remember the proceeds from the sale benefited the Broad Plain Boys' Club in Bristol. Mobile lovers got Banksy publicity and publicity converts into money. Or ........ He donated a piece to charity ....... Again. |
|
saucyjack
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 197
๐๐ป 74
November 2015
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by saucyjack on Dec 29, 2015 0:02:24 GMT 1, Yes, I remember the circumstances surrounding the sale of the original Mobile Lovers street piece. I seem to remember the proceeds from the sale benefited the Broad Plain Boys' Club in Bristol. Mobile lovers got Banksy publicity and publicity converts into money.
Yes, I remember the circumstances surrounding the sale of the original Mobile Lovers street piece. I seem to remember the proceeds from the sale benefited the Broad Plain Boys' Club in Bristol. Mobile lovers got Banksy publicity and publicity converts into money. ... and 400K Pounds for the Boy's Club. |
|
|
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by Deleted on Dec 29, 2015 0:09:57 GMT 1, Is the message/joke not in this source photo? Part if it is, I will grant you. But not all of it. Another part of the banksy piece is that it's in the dark, and the light from the phones is illuminating the lovers faces. And from what I've seen of the source photos banksy has used, the vast majority of them are changed hugely to create the message. Applause, Morons, golf sale etc etc. In a later post you mention the law and precedence. For my own part I'm not talking about the law. I'm referring to my own moral compass. I accept fr's point that I don't know whether the cartoon came first or not. But I suspect it did, as the impression given was that this was a new Jboy piece. If that's wrong then I apologise. It is also quite possible that Jboy came up with the idea quite independently, without ever having seen the cartoon. If that's the case, I'm suprised that FR simply didn't say so. I would have accepted that as I have nothing to suggest the contrary.
6th March 2015 for the cartoon.
www.cartoonmovement.com/cartoon/20003
Is the message/joke not in this source photo? Part if it is, I will grant you. But not all of it. Another part of the banksy piece is that it's in the dark, and the light from the phones is illuminating the lovers faces. And from what I've seen of the source photos banksy has used, the vast majority of them are changed hugely to create the message. Applause, Morons, golf sale etc etc. In a later post you mention the law and precedence. For my own part I'm not talking about the law. I'm referring to my own moral compass. I accept fr's point that I don't know whether the cartoon came first or not. But I suspect it did, as the impression given was that this was a new Jboy piece. If that's wrong then I apologise. It is also quite possible that Jboy came up with the idea quite independently, without ever having seen the cartoon. If that's the case, I'm suprised that FR simply didn't say so. I would have accepted that as I have nothing to suggest the contrary. 6th March 2015 for the cartoon. www.cartoonmovement.com/cartoon/20003 |
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by Deleted on Dec 29, 2015 0:11:54 GMT 1, Mobile lovers got Banksy publicity and publicity converts into money. ... and 400K Pounds for the Boy's Club.
Considering he did it on someone else property not his.
What else could he have done but let the Boys Club have it?
Mobile lovers got Banksy publicity and publicity converts into money. ... and 400K Pounds for the Boy's Club. Considering he did it on someone else property not his. What else could he have done but let the Boys Club have it? |
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by Deleted on Dec 29, 2015 0:16:11 GMT 1, I do agree tho that if Banksy created the photo shop mish mash attributed to JBoy that people would be saying altho the punchline is similar the image is different in that it depicts a rich b***h giving a dollar to people who look like refugees and it's about raising awareness of the refugee crisis and how the rich donate to appease their conscience whislt making money from investing in things which creat these poverty and global divides etc etc etc.
I do agree tho that if Banksy created the photo shop mish mash attributed to JBoy that people would be saying altho the punchline is similar the image is different in that it depicts a rich b***h giving a dollar to people who look like refugees and it's about raising awareness of the refugee crisis and how the rich donate to appease their conscience whislt making money from investing in things which creat these poverty and global divides etc etc etc.
|
|
saucyjack
New Member
๐จ๏ธ 197
๐๐ป 74
November 2015
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by saucyjack on Dec 29, 2015 0:19:30 GMT 1, ... and 400K Pounds for the Boy's Club. Considering he did it on someone else property not his. What else could he have done but let the Boys Club have it?
As we all know, placement is key with Banksy. I suspect it was not just a random act of vandalism that happened to benefit the club.
... and 400K Pounds for the Boy's Club. Considering he did it on someone else property not his. What else could he have done but let the Boys Club have it? As you know, it was well established Banksy works were being removed from their original locations and sold at auction. Did it ever occur to you that Banksy knew what he was doing in regards to the placement of Mobile Lovers? Perhaps he used to frequent that particular youth club as a youth himself and didn't want to see it close. As we all know, placement is key with Banksy. I suspect it was not just a random act of vandalism that happened to benefit the club. |
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by Deleted on Dec 29, 2015 0:23:12 GMT 1, Considering he did it on someone else property not his. What else could he have done but let the Boys Club have it? As you know, it was well established Banksy works were being removed from their original locations and sold at auction. Did it ever occur to you that Banksy knew what he was doing in regards to the placement of Mobile Lovers? Perhaps he used to frequent that particular youth club as a youth himself and didn't want to see it close. As we all know, placement is key with Banksy. I suspect it was not just a random act of vandalism that happened to benefit the club.
Double publicity then.
Considering he did it on someone else property not his. What else could he have done but let the Boys Club have it? As you know, it was well established Banksy works were being removed from their original locations and sold at auction. Did it ever occur to you that Banksy knew what he was doing in regards to the placement of Mobile Lovers? Perhaps he used to frequent that particular youth club as a youth himself and didn't want to see it close. As we all know, placement is key with Banksy. I suspect it was not just a random act of vandalism that happened to benefit the club. Double publicity then. |
|
iamzero
Full Member
๐จ๏ธ 9,190
๐๐ป 8,545
May 2011
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by iamzero on Dec 29, 2015 0:25:43 GMT 1, Great PR for Jboy is this.
Great PR for Jboy is this.
|
|
|
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by Coach on Dec 29, 2015 0:26:27 GMT 1, Considering he did it on someone else property not his. What else could he have done but let the Boys Club have it? As you know, it was well established Banksy works were being removed from their original locations and sold at auction. Did it ever occur to you that Banksy knew what he was doing in regards to the placement of Mobile Lovers? Perhaps he used to frequent that particular youth club as a youth himself and didn't want to see it close.ย As we all know, placement is key with Banksy. I suspect it was not just a random act of vandalism that happened to benefit the club.
It is my recollection that it was done on a piece of board rather than a wall, the result being that it could be removed.
Considering he did it on someone else property not his. What else could he have done but let the Boys Club have it? As you know, it was well established Banksy works were being removed from their original locations and sold at auction. Did it ever occur to you that Banksy knew what he was doing in regards to the placement of Mobile Lovers? Perhaps he used to frequent that particular youth club as a youth himself and didn't want to see it close.ย As we all know, placement is key with Banksy. I suspect it was not just a random act of vandalism that happened to benefit the club. It is my recollection that it was done on a piece of board rather than a wall, the result being that it could be removed. |
|
Deleted
๐จ๏ธ 0
๐๐ป
January 1970
|
JBOY ๐ฌ๐ง New Print Release โข JBoy Art For Sale, by Deleted on Dec 29, 2015 0:28:39 GMT 1, As you know, it was well established Banksy works were being removed from their original locations and sold at auction. Did it ever occur to you that Banksy knew what he was doing in regards to the placement of Mobile Lovers? Perhaps he used to frequent that particular youth club as a youth himself and didn't want to see it close.ย As we all know, placement is key with Banksy. I suspect it was not just a random act of vandalism that happened to benefit the club. It is my recollection that it was done on a piece of board rather than a wall, the result being that it could be removed.
who owned the board?
As you know, it was well established Banksy works were being removed from their original locations and sold at auction. Did it ever occur to you that Banksy knew what he was doing in regards to the placement of Mobile Lovers? Perhaps he used to frequent that particular youth club as a youth himself and didn't want to see it close.ย As we all know, placement is key with Banksy. I suspect it was not just a random act of vandalism that happened to benefit the club. It is my recollection that it was done on a piece of board rather than a wall, the result being that it could be removed. who owned the board? |
|
