|
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Pete the Post on Dec 4, 2023 15:56:10 GMT 1, This Just popped up on STIK's site. Seems some fakery is going on.
Interesting to see where this one turned up! Nothing to do with STIK or LA2 apparently.
Figured i would share, as this is one hell of a grail piece that many might jum,p at!
WARNING
December 04, 2023
Reproductions of artwork CR-20140602 ‘Crawling Baby’ 2014
by STIK and LA2 have been seen on the secondary market.
These are NOT part of the STIK Catalogue Raisonée.
They are NOT certificated by STIK Ltd.™
If in doubt please contact www.stik.org/contact
This Just popped up on STIK's site. Seems some fakery is going on. Interesting to see where this one turned up! Nothing to do with STIK or LA2 apparently. Figured i would share, as this is one hell of a grail piece that many might jum,p at! WARNING December 04, 2023 Reproductions of artwork CR-20140602 ‘Crawling Baby’ 2014 by STIK and LA2 have been seen on the secondary market. These are NOT part of the STIK Catalogue Raisonée. They are NOT certificated by STIK Ltd.™ If in doubt please contact www.stik.org/contact |
|
Wearology
Junior Member
Staff at FatFreeArt
🗨️ 3,598
👍🏻 4,514
April 2008
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Wearology on Dec 4, 2023 16:43:34 GMT 1, As stated on STIK's instagram post -
They are not authorized by the Angel "LA2" Ortiz Studio and or the Stik Studio.
As stated on STIK's instagram post -
They are not authorized by the Angel "LA2" Ortiz Studio and or the Stik Studio.
|
|
|
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Elvis to Pete on Dec 4, 2023 20:06:26 GMT 1, Where were these seen on the secondary?
Where were these seen on the secondary?
|
|
The Rat King
New Member
🗨️ 718
👍🏻 444
Member is Online
September 2016
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by The Rat King on Dec 5, 2023 10:53:54 GMT 1, These will be on fake or fortune in years to come with the catalogue raisonee now coming into force !
These will be on fake or fortune in years to come with the catalogue raisonee now coming into force !
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Pete the Post on Dec 5, 2023 14:24:36 GMT 1, Thats the book prints.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Pete the Post on Dec 5, 2023 14:27:42 GMT 1, Just seen a pic of the warning piece on PFG insta, seems they recently framed it for a customer, nothing to say if they just framed it or actually sold it.
Just seen a pic of the warning piece on PFG insta, seems they recently framed it for a customer, nothing to say if they just framed it or actually sold it.
|
|
|
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Elvis to Pete on Dec 5, 2023 20:19:15 GMT 1, Were these an edition he did not release then? So these are not what he says? "test,proofs and insurance copies"
Were these an edition he did not release then? So these are not what he says? "test,proofs and insurance copies" |
|
|
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Pete the Post on Dec 6, 2023 0:16:59 GMT 1, Were these an edition he did not release then? So these are not what he says? "test,proofs and insurance copies"
Were these an edition he did not release then? So these are not what he says? "test,proofs and insurance copies" He burned the book prints, but ive watched him dispatch various otther things over the years too. So both would be true. |
|
|
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Elvis to Pete on Dec 6, 2023 10:51:56 GMT 1, you definitely know all the gossip 
you definitely know all the gossip |
|
|
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Pete the Post on Dec 6, 2023 11:28:34 GMT 1, you definitely know all the gossip
you definitely know all the gossip Gossip is the wrong word, but whatever. |
|
|
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Elvis to Pete on Dec 6, 2023 22:37:03 GMT 1, This Just popped up on STIK's site. Seems some fakery is going on. Interesting to see where this one turned up! Nothing to do with STIK or LA2 apparently. Figured i would share, as this is one hell of a grail piece that many might jum,p at! WARNING December 04, 2023 Reproductions of artwork CR-20140602 ‘Crawling Baby’ 2014 by STIK and LA2 have been seen on the secondary market. These are NOT part of the STIK Catalogue Raisonée. They are NOT certificated by STIK Ltd.™ If in doubt please contact www.stik.org/contact
This Just popped up on STIK's site. Seems some fakery is going on. Interesting to see where this one turned up! Nothing to do with STIK or LA2 apparently. Figured i would share, as this is one hell of a grail piece that many might jum,p at! WARNING December 04, 2023 Reproductions of artwork CR-20140602 ‘Crawling Baby’ 2014 by STIK and LA2 have been seen on the secondary market. These are NOT part of the STIK Catalogue Raisonée. They are NOT certificated by STIK Ltd.™ If in doubt please contact www.stik.org/contactYou have said fakery.. is it fake? Where is it on the secondary? Are you sure Stik and LA2 had nothing to do with it? Another image is circulating to counter you gossip it seems. |
|
|
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Pete the Post on Dec 7, 2023 0:07:26 GMT 1, This Just popped up on STIK's site. Seems some fakery is going on. Interesting to see where this one turned up! Nothing to do with STIK or LA2 apparently. Figured i would share, as this is one hell of a grail piece that many might jum,p at! WARNING December 04, 2023 Reproductions of artwork CR-20140602 ‘Crawling Baby’ 2014 by STIK and LA2 have been seen on the secondary market. These are NOT part of the STIK Catalogue Raisonée. They are NOT certificated by STIK Ltd.™ If in doubt please contact www.stik.org/contactYou have said fakery.. is it fake? Where is it on the secondary? Are you sure Stik and LA2 had nothing to do with it? Another image is circulating to counter you gossip it seems.
Ill leave youi to explain why you know better again now.
This Just popped up on STIK's site. Seems some fakery is going on. Interesting to see where this one turned up! Nothing to do with STIK or LA2 apparently. Figured i would share, as this is one hell of a grail piece that many might jum,p at! WARNING December 04, 2023 Reproductions of artwork CR-20140602 ‘Crawling Baby’ 2014 by STIK and LA2 have been seen on the secondary market. These are NOT part of the STIK Catalogue Raisonée. They are NOT certificated by STIK Ltd.™ If in doubt please contact www.stik.org/contactYou have said fakery.. is it fake? Where is it on the secondary? Are you sure Stik and LA2 had nothing to do with it? Another image is circulating to counter you gossip it seems. lol i know its not getting any authentication and neither of them recognises it as their work, split hairs all you like, my gossip is from a phone call with a mate, his name is STIK in case you think you know better. Ill leave youi to explain why you know better again now. |
|
|
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Average Joe on Dec 7, 2023 8:01:33 GMT 1, 
The plot thickens..
The plot thickens.. |
|
|
|
FЯ
Full Member
🗨️ 8,264
👍🏻 9,252
May 2013
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by FЯ on Dec 7, 2023 9:06:48 GMT 1, Seems these are not fakes based on ryca posting. Just prints stiks decided to detach from. He could do this to any print edition which is a worry for collectors.
i never understand why artists print, sign, then number editions then leave them - just like the one above.
Burning those lovely book prints, whilst filming it like a stunt is questionable on its intent.
coming from a stik fan.
Seems these are not fakes based on ryca posting. Just prints stiks decided to detach from. He could do this to any print edition which is a worry for collectors.
i never understand why artists print, sign, then number editions then leave them - just like the one above.
Burning those lovely book prints, whilst filming it like a stunt is questionable on its intent.
coming from a stik fan.
|
|
The Rat King
New Member
🗨️ 718
👍🏻 444
Member is Online
September 2016
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by The Rat King on Dec 7, 2023 9:12:54 GMT 1, Ryca used to print for Stik via squarity back in the day
is squarity still a thing ?
looks like there has been a falling out
Ryca used to print for Stik via squarity back in the day
is squarity still a thing ?
looks like there has been a falling out
|
|
|
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Pete the Post on Dec 7, 2023 10:39:37 GMT 1, Seems these are not fakes based on ryca posting. Just prints stiks decided to detach from. He could do this to any print edition which is a worry for collectors. i never understand why artists print, sign, then number editions then leave them - just like the one above. Burning those lovely book prints, whilst filming it like a stunt is questionable on its intent. coming from a stik fan.
You also dont know why he burned those prints, so not sure how you are questioning his intent. Your also making some big assumptions regarding the above print, stik says not his work, but you seem to think it is lol. Sounds like a bit of pointless shit stirring to me.
Totally separate to this situation, Printers in the past have done sketchy things, Banksy being the VERY obvious example, artists give authenticity, printers make prints. The artist, is the only person whos opinion matters here.
Seems these are not fakes based on ryca posting. Just prints stiks decided to detach from. He could do this to any print edition which is a worry for collectors. i never understand why artists print, sign, then number editions then leave them - just like the one above. Burning those lovely book prints, whilst filming it like a stunt is questionable on its intent. coming from a stik fan. I guess thats one way to drive yourself down the wrong road. Id probably stick with only taking authentication advice from the artist if i was you. I find it unlikely Christies will be heading to RYCA anytime soon for any form of authentication lol. You also dont know why he burned those prints, so not sure how you are questioning his intent. Your also making some big assumptions regarding the above print, stik says not his work, but you seem to think it is lol. Sounds like a bit of pointless shit stirring to me. Totally separate to this situation, Printers in the past have done sketchy things, Banksy being the VERY obvious example, artists give authenticity, printers make prints. The artist, is the only person whos opinion matters here. |
|
FЯ
Full Member
🗨️ 8,264
👍🏻 9,252
May 2013
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by FЯ on Dec 7, 2023 10:51:54 GMT 1, Seems these are not fakes based on ryca posting. Just prints stiks decided to detach from. He could do this to any print edition which is a worry for collectors. i never understand why artists print, sign, then number editions then leave them - just like the one above. Burning those lovely book prints, whilst filming it like a stunt is questionable on its intent. coming from a stik fan. I guess thats one way to drive yourself down the wrong road. Id probably stick with only taking authentication advice from the artist if i was you. I find it unlikely Christies will be heading to RYCA anytime soon for any form of authentication lol. You also dont know why he burned those prints, so not sure how you are questioning his intent. Your also making some big assumptions regarding the above print, stik says not his work, but you seem to think it is lol. Sounds like a bit of pointless shit stirring to me. Totally separate to this situation, Printers in the past have done sketchy things, Banksy being the VERY obvious example, artists give authenticity, printers make prints. The artist, is the only person whos opinion matters here.
im just saying its clearly not fake if the artist printed and signed them! Maybe calling them un-authorised for release is a better statement. Clearly not fake though and you suggesting the printer faked them is libellous.
Stik, like the book prints has decided he does not like them which is dangerous to anything hes put out.
Seems these are not fakes based on ryca posting. Just prints stiks decided to detach from. He could do this to any print edition which is a worry for collectors. i never understand why artists print, sign, then number editions then leave them - just like the one above. Burning those lovely book prints, whilst filming it like a stunt is questionable on its intent. coming from a stik fan. I guess thats one way to drive yourself down the wrong road. Id probably stick with only taking authentication advice from the artist if i was you. I find it unlikely Christies will be heading to RYCA anytime soon for any form of authentication lol. You also dont know why he burned those prints, so not sure how you are questioning his intent. Your also making some big assumptions regarding the above print, stik says not his work, but you seem to think it is lol. Sounds like a bit of pointless shit stirring to me. Totally separate to this situation, Printers in the past have done sketchy things, Banksy being the VERY obvious example, artists give authenticity, printers make prints. The artist, is the only person whos opinion matters here. im just saying its clearly not fake if the artist printed and signed them! Maybe calling them un-authorised for release is a better statement. Clearly not fake though and you suggesting the printer faked them is libellous. Stik, like the book prints has decided he does not like them which is dangerous to anything hes put out. |
|
|
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Terry Fuckwitt on Dec 7, 2023 11:03:35 GMT 1, Are these backdoor prints coming from squarity again? If it is, I can see why stik would be pissed...
Are these backdoor prints coming from squarity again? If it is, I can see why stik would be pissed...
|
|
Wanchope
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,500
👍🏻 1,322
February 2020
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Wanchope on Dec 7, 2023 11:12:55 GMT 1, Also it isn't just Stik involved here is it is also Angel Ortiz LAll who has distanced himself from them!
Also it isn't just Stik involved here is it is also Angel Ortiz LAll who has distanced himself from them!
|
|
|
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Pete the Post on Dec 7, 2023 11:15:13 GMT 1, I guess thats one way to drive yourself down the wrong road. Id probably stick with only taking authentication advice from the artist if i was you. I find it unlikely Christies will be heading to RYCA anytime soon for any form of authentication lol. You also dont know why he burned those prints, so not sure how you are questioning his intent. Your also making some big assumptions regarding the above print, stik says not his work, but you seem to think it is lol. Sounds like a bit of pointless shit stirring to me. Totally separate to this situation, Printers in the past have done sketchy things, Banksy being the VERY obvious example, artists give authenticity, printers make prints. The artist, is the only person whos opinion matters here. im just saying its clearly not fake if the artist printed and signed them! Maybe calling them un-authorised for release is a better statement. Clearly not fake though and you suggesting the printer faked them is libellous. Stik, like the book prints has decided he does not like them which is dangerous to anything hes put out.
Only prints ive ever seen in auctions are the numbered edition the AP and PP versions, so buy outside of that and you get no authentication, so split hairs if you will, but they are worthless weather they were commissioned as tests or not.
Artist authentication is the ONLY thing that matters.
as far as libel goes, id say im safe. Unless the piece both artists have discredited is suddenly declared legit. Dont really see a court nailing me on the printers word when the artists both say not legit lol.
I guess thats one way to drive yourself down the wrong road. Id probably stick with only taking authentication advice from the artist if i was you. I find it unlikely Christies will be heading to RYCA anytime soon for any form of authentication lol. You also dont know why he burned those prints, so not sure how you are questioning his intent. Your also making some big assumptions regarding the above print, stik says not his work, but you seem to think it is lol. Sounds like a bit of pointless shit stirring to me. Totally separate to this situation, Printers in the past have done sketchy things, Banksy being the VERY obvious example, artists give authenticity, printers make prints. The artist, is the only person whos opinion matters here. im just saying its clearly not fake if the artist printed and signed them! Maybe calling them un-authorised for release is a better statement. Clearly not fake though and you suggesting the printer faked them is libellous. Stik, like the book prints has decided he does not like them which is dangerous to anything hes put out. Lol, ok no worries. Its up to the printer to decide whats authorised / sold, not the artist, noted and thanks for the info. Only prints ive ever seen in auctions are the numbered edition the AP and PP versions, so buy outside of that and you get no authentication, so split hairs if you will, but they are worthless weather they were commissioned as tests or not. Artist authentication is the ONLY thing that matters. as far as libel goes, id say im safe. Unless the piece both artists have discredited is suddenly declared legit. Dont really see a court nailing me on the printers word when the artists both say not legit lol. |
|
FЯ
Full Member
🗨️ 8,264
👍🏻 9,252
May 2013
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by FЯ on Dec 7, 2023 11:29:00 GMT 1, Well it definitely is no fun if for some reason tomorrow, stik decides that a whole edition is suddenly not liked anymore. What does everyone do in that scenario.
I am not suggesting the printer is authenticating either btw. I am saying they are clearly not 'fakes'. Why are you getting hung up on that. Im talking about stik deciding what is good and what is not as he feels, even on things that are clearly editions or intended to be editions that he calls fakes!
Well it definitely is no fun if for some reason tomorrow, stik decides that a whole edition is suddenly not liked anymore. What does everyone do in that scenario.
I am not suggesting the printer is authenticating either btw. I am saying they are clearly not 'fakes'. Why are you getting hung up on that. Im talking about stik deciding what is good and what is not as he feels, even on things that are clearly editions or intended to be editions that he calls fakes!
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Pete the Post on Dec 7, 2023 11:42:14 GMT 1, Well it definitely is no fun if for some reason tomorrow, stik decides that a whole edition is suddenly not liked anymore. What does everyone do in that scenario. I am not suggesting the printer is authenticating either btw. I am saying they are clearly not 'fakes'. Why are you getting hung up on that. Im talking about stik deciding what is good and what is not as he feels, even on things that are clearly editions or intended to be editions that he calls fakes!
Also why are you seemingly suggesting he will decide the edition of lovers no longer exists? The book prints were never sold, its not the same thing at all. Its a lot of shit stirring by the sound of it mate. Your not making realistic comparisons.
Well it definitely is no fun if for some reason tomorrow, stik decides that a whole edition is suddenly not liked anymore. What does everyone do in that scenario. I am not suggesting the printer is authenticating either btw. I am saying they are clearly not 'fakes'. Why are you getting hung up on that. Im talking about stik deciding what is good and what is not as he feels, even on things that are clearly editions or intended to be editions that he calls fakes! What makes you so sure they are not fake? again, its for STIK to decide that, and he has declared them not real. Also why are you seemingly suggesting he will decide the edition of lovers no longer exists? The book prints were never sold, its not the same thing at all. Its a lot of shit stirring by the sound of it mate. Your not making realistic comparisons. |
|
|
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by trickledown on Dec 7, 2023 11:47:17 GMT 1, Just because some guy in Shenzhen China stamps the word "Rolex" on to watches he produces himself, doesn't mean their fake. Just means they are not "official" that's all.
Just because some guy in Shenzhen China stamps the word "Rolex" on to watches he produces himself, doesn't mean their fake. Just means they are not "official" that's all.
|
|
Sundowner
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,227
👍🏻 2,429
September 2008
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Sundowner on Dec 7, 2023 12:19:05 GMT 1, I'm not familiar with the background on the Stik/Squarity divorce - any links anyone has to this previously?
I'm not familiar with the background on the Stik/Squarity divorce - any links anyone has to this previously?
|
|
FЯ
Full Member
🗨️ 8,264
👍🏻 9,252
May 2013
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by FЯ on Dec 7, 2023 12:45:30 GMT 1, Well it definitely is no fun if for some reason tomorrow, stik decides that a whole edition is suddenly not liked anymore. What does everyone do in that scenario. I am not suggesting the printer is authenticating either btw. I am saying they are clearly not 'fakes'. Why are you getting hung up on that. Im talking about stik deciding what is good and what is not as he feels, even on things that are clearly editions or intended to be editions that he calls fakes! What makes you so sure they are not fake? again, its for STIK to decide that, and he has declared them not real. Also why are you seemingly suggesting he will decide the edition of lovers no longer exists? The book prints were never sold, its not the same thing at all. Its a lot of shit stirring by the sound of it mate. Your not making realistic comparisons.
There is a difference between fake / not real / not made by the artist and made by the artist but pretending they dont exist.
In this scenario its the second.
I never mentioned lovers? what are you talking about?
Well it definitely is no fun if for some reason tomorrow, stik decides that a whole edition is suddenly not liked anymore. What does everyone do in that scenario. I am not suggesting the printer is authenticating either btw. I am saying they are clearly not 'fakes'. Why are you getting hung up on that. Im talking about stik deciding what is good and what is not as he feels, even on things that are clearly editions or intended to be editions that he calls fakes! What makes you so sure they are not fake? again, its for STIK to decide that, and he has declared them not real. Also why are you seemingly suggesting he will decide the edition of lovers no longer exists? The book prints were never sold, its not the same thing at all. Its a lot of shit stirring by the sound of it mate. Your not making realistic comparisons. There is a difference between fake / not real / not made by the artist and made by the artist but pretending they dont exist. In this scenario its the second. I never mentioned lovers? what are you talking about? |
|
|
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Elvis to Pete on Dec 7, 2023 13:04:22 GMT 1, You have said fakery.. is it fake? Where is it on the secondary? Are you sure Stik and LA2 had nothing to do with it? Another image is circulating to counter you gossip it seems. lol i know its not getting any authentication and neither of them recognises it as their work, split hairs all you like, my gossip is from a phone call with a mate, his name is STIK in case you think you know better. Ill leave youi to explain why you know better again now.
I have nothing to explain.. just holding you words to account.
You have said fakery.. is it fake? Where is it on the secondary? Are you sure Stik and LA2 had nothing to do with it? Another image is circulating to counter you gossip it seems. lol i know its not getting any authentication and neither of them recognises it as their work, split hairs all you like, my gossip is from a phone call with a mate, his name is STIK in case you think you know better. Ill leave youi to explain why you know better again now. You seem to be bit of a crap self serving friend if this is how you behave. Anyone can call Stik up, blow smoke up his backside in the hope for a few crumbs form the bread table. I have nothing to explain.. just holding you words to account. |
|
|
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Pete the Post on Dec 7, 2023 13:08:40 GMT 1, What makes you so sure they are not fake? again, its for STIK to decide that, and he has declared them not real. Also why are you seemingly suggesting he will decide the edition of lovers no longer exists? The book prints were never sold, its not the same thing at all. Its a lot of shit stirring by the sound of it mate. Your not making realistic comparisons. There is a difference between fake / not real / not made by the artist and made by the artist but pretending they dont exist. In this scenario its the second. I never mentioned lovers? what are you talking about?
You said this, as if an edition that had been sold would be deemed unofficial all of a sudden, thats why i mentioned lovers, which should really have been pretty obvious.
Im just going to chuck out a guess here, youve got a few non AP/PP/edition prints havnt you.
What makes you so sure they are not fake? again, its for STIK to decide that, and he has declared them not real. Also why are you seemingly suggesting he will decide the edition of lovers no longer exists? The book prints were never sold, its not the same thing at all. Its a lot of shit stirring by the sound of it mate. Your not making realistic comparisons. There is a difference between fake / not real / not made by the artist and made by the artist but pretending they dont exist. In this scenario its the second. I never mentioned lovers? what are you talking about? "if for some reason tomorrow, stik decides that a whole edition is suddenly not liked anymore. What does everyone do in that scenario." You said this, as if an edition that had been sold would be deemed unofficial all of a sudden, thats why i mentioned lovers, which should really have been pretty obvious. Im just going to chuck out a guess here, youve got a few non AP/PP/edition prints havnt you. |
|
|
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by Pete the Post on Dec 7, 2023 13:12:05 GMT 1, lol i know its not getting any authentication and neither of them recognises it as their work, split hairs all you like, my gossip is from a phone call with a mate, his name is STIK in case you think you know better. Ill leave youi to explain why you know better again now. You seem to be bit of a crap self serving friend if this is how you behave. Anyone can call Stik up, blow smoke up his backside in the hope for a few crumbs form the bread table. I have nothing to explain.. just holding you words to account.
lol i know its not getting any authentication and neither of them recognises it as their work, split hairs all you like, my gossip is from a phone call with a mate, his name is STIK in case you think you know better. Ill leave youi to explain why you know better again now. You seem to be bit of a crap self serving friend if this is how you behave. Anyone can call Stik up, blow smoke up his backside in the hope for a few crumbs form the bread table. I have nothing to explain.. just holding you words to account. Lol and anyone can talk shit eh elvis. You know nothing bud. |
|
FЯ
Full Member
🗨️ 8,264
👍🏻 9,252
May 2013
|
FAKE STIK LA2 been pushed around, stay well clear , by FЯ on Dec 7, 2023 13:25:36 GMT 1, There is a difference between fake / not real / not made by the artist and made by the artist but pretending they dont exist. In this scenario its the second. I never mentioned lovers? what are you talking about? "if for some reason tomorrow, stik decides that a whole edition is suddenly not liked anymore. What does everyone do in that scenario." You said this, as if an edition that had been sold would be deemed unofficial all of a sudden, thats why i mentioned lovers, which should really have been pretty obvious. Im just going to chuck out a guess here, youve got a few non AP/PP/edition prints havnt you.
You seem very attacky to people.
Im just making a point that an artist cannot just decide what they do and do not like anymore when they already printed, signed and they know people have them in their collections. You mentioned lovers but yes i guess he could suddenly decide then that that is no longer any good.
You say he would not do that but what stops him based on whats been demonstrated with LA2 one which looks to have been a potential edition that did not happen.
You cant just call them fake though, thats wrong wording. No one has faked these stik prints, despite the simple nature of stik and having seen actual fake attempts, they stand out like a sore thumb as being real.
There is a difference between fake / not real / not made by the artist and made by the artist but pretending they dont exist. In this scenario its the second. I never mentioned lovers? what are you talking about? "if for some reason tomorrow, stik decides that a whole edition is suddenly not liked anymore. What does everyone do in that scenario." You said this, as if an edition that had been sold would be deemed unofficial all of a sudden, thats why i mentioned lovers, which should really have been pretty obvious. Im just going to chuck out a guess here, youve got a few non AP/PP/edition prints havnt you. You seem very attacky to people. Im just making a point that an artist cannot just decide what they do and do not like anymore when they already printed, signed and they know people have them in their collections. You mentioned lovers but yes i guess he could suddenly decide then that that is no longer any good. You say he would not do that but what stops him based on whats been demonstrated with LA2 one which looks to have been a potential edition that did not happen. You cant just call them fake though, thats wrong wording. No one has faked these stik prints, despite the simple nature of stik and having seen actual fake attempts, they stand out like a sore thumb as being real. |
|
