Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Invader Versailles Print , by Deleted on Jan 4, 2019 0:03:26 GMT 1, (Do you have one of these beautiful Invader Versailles Prints in your Art Collection? or do you possibly have one For Sale? Post here in this thread.)
Oh I hope all the invader flippers get burned.
(Do you have one of these beautiful Invader Versailles Prints in your Art Collection? or do you possibly have one For Sale? Post here in this thread.)
Oh I hope all the invader flippers get burned.
|
|
Inknart
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,490
👍🏻 3,288
April 2015
|
Invader Versailles Print , by Inknart on Jan 4, 2019 0:51:35 GMT 1, Oh I hope all the invader flippers get burned. 2000 for a nice invader print that was 1700 on release isn't exactly a flip. I'm sure a year from now when the market is dry these will look like the best deals ever.
just like everyone on here 3 weeks ago saying the new kit wouldn't fetch more than 3500, most are gone already from the initial release.
Seller also says he is accepting offers.
No idea on what Brantley pieces go for as I don't collect so cannot comment.
GLWS OP
Oh I hope all the invader flippers get burned. 2000 for a nice invader print that was 1700 on release isn't exactly a flip. I'm sure a year from now when the market is dry these will look like the best deals ever. just like everyone on here 3 weeks ago saying the new kit wouldn't fetch more than 3500, most are gone already from the initial release.
Seller also says he is accepting offers.
No idea on what Brantley pieces go for as I don't collect so cannot comment.
GLWS OP
|
|
cest
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,725
👍🏻 1,160
September 2018
|
Invader Versailles Print , by cest on Jan 4, 2019 2:56:05 GMT 1, Fair price on the invader. Glwts
Fair price on the invader. Glwts
|
|
|
Invader Versailles Print , by touchdowntodd on Jan 4, 2019 3:27:19 GMT 1, Invader really tempting..
I think I'm the only one that would love it on his wall lol
Invader really tempting..
I think I'm the only one that would love it on his wall lol
|
|
bbperez1
New Member
🗨️ 754
👍🏻 601
April 2017
|
Invader Versailles Print , by bbperez1 on Jan 4, 2019 4:05:39 GMT 1, Invader really tempting.. I think I'm the only one that would love it on his wall lol
C’mon Todd.. you can afford it. Lol
First art purchase of 2019. You deserve it. Plus considering retail was $1700 .. 2k isn’t bad.
Invader really tempting.. I think I'm the only one that would love it on his wall lol C’mon Todd.. you can afford it. Lol First art purchase of 2019. You deserve it. Plus considering retail was $1700 .. 2k isn’t bad.
|
|
Ottomatik
Junior Member
🗨️ 4,233
👍🏻 2,471
March 2009
|
Invader Versailles Print , by Ottomatik on Jan 4, 2019 4:52:46 GMT 1, Oh I hope all the invader flippers get burned. 2000 for a nice invader print that was 1700 on release isn't exactly a flip. I'm sure a year from now when the market is dry these will look like the best deals ever. just like everyone on here 3 weeks ago saying the new kit wouldn't fetch more than 3500, most are gone already from the initial release.
Seller also says he is accepting offers.
No idea on what Brantley pieces go for as I don't collect so cannot comment.
GLWS OP
People paid 1700 for this? That’s HILARIOUS.
Oh I hope all the invader flippers get burned. 2000 for a nice invader print that was 1700 on release isn't exactly a flip. I'm sure a year from now when the market is dry these will look like the best deals ever. just like everyone on here 3 weeks ago saying the new kit wouldn't fetch more than 3500, most are gone already from the initial release.
Seller also says he is accepting offers.
No idea on what Brantley pieces go for as I don't collect so cannot comment.
GLWS OP
People paid 1700 for this? That’s HILARIOUS.
|
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Invader Versailles Print , by Deleted on Jan 4, 2019 8:16:13 GMT 1, 2000 for a nice invader print that was 1700 on release isn't exactly a flip. I'm sure a year from now when the market is dry these will look like the best deals ever. just like everyone on here 3 weeks ago saying the new kit wouldn't fetch more than 3500, most are gone already from the initial release.
Seller also says he is accepting offers.
No idea on what Brantley pieces go for as I don't collect so cannot comment.
GLWS OP
People paid 1700 for this? That’s HILARIOUS.
tho i like invaders stuff i do agree 1700 for the image is just...branding of the name... A la Supreme. Though as long as there is a market. If this same image was released by,let's say munk1, no one would even consider it because there is no meat on the bone..i know plenty of collectors who buy this and jerkfaces based on hype$ and not particularly cuz of the image, tho they may like it, but if it had another name on it they wouldn't consider it. *shrugs*
2000 for a nice invader print that was 1700 on release isn't exactly a flip. I'm sure a year from now when the market is dry these will look like the best deals ever. just like everyone on here 3 weeks ago saying the new kit wouldn't fetch more than 3500, most are gone already from the initial release.
Seller also says he is accepting offers.
No idea on what Brantley pieces go for as I don't collect so cannot comment.
GLWS OP
People paid 1700 for this? That’s HILARIOUS. tho i like invaders stuff i do agree 1700 for the image is just...branding of the name... A la Supreme. Though as long as there is a market. If this same image was released by,let's say munk1, no one would even consider it because there is no meat on the bone..i know plenty of collectors who buy this and jerkfaces based on hype$ and not particularly cuz of the image, tho they may like it, but if it had another name on it they wouldn't consider it. *shrugs*
|
|
|
Invader Versailles Print , by Sweet Fanny Adams on Jan 4, 2019 11:48:20 GMT 1, People paid 1700 for this? That’s HILARIOUS. tho i like invaders stuff i do agree 1700 for the image is just...branding of the name... A la Supreme. Though as long as there is a market. If this same image was released by,let's say munk1, no one would even consider it because there is no meat on the bone..i know plenty of collectors who buy this and jerkfaces based on hype$ and not particularly cuz of the image, tho they may like it, but if it had another name on it they wouldn't consider it. *shrugs* Invader - hype - haha
People paid 1700 for this? That’s HILARIOUS. tho i like invaders stuff i do agree 1700 for the image is just...branding of the name... A la Supreme. Though as long as there is a market. If this same image was released by,let's say munk1, no one would even consider it because there is no meat on the bone..i know plenty of collectors who buy this and jerkfaces based on hype$ and not particularly cuz of the image, tho they may like it, but if it had another name on it they wouldn't consider it. *shrugs* Invader - hype - haha
|
|
|
Invader Versailles Print , by Forbidden Love on Jan 4, 2019 12:47:22 GMT 1, tho i like invaders stuff i do agree 1700 for the image is just...branding of the name... A la Supreme. Though as long as there is a market. If this same image was released by,let's say munk1, no one would even consider it because there is no meat on the bone..i know plenty of collectors who buy this and jerkfaces based on hype$ and not particularly cuz of the image, tho they may like it, but if it had another name on it they wouldn't consider it. *shrugs* Invader - hype - haha
agree, no hype for Invader I'm afraid, it has been earned.
tho i like invaders stuff i do agree 1700 for the image is just...branding of the name... A la Supreme. Though as long as there is a market. If this same image was released by,let's say munk1, no one would even consider it because there is no meat on the bone..i know plenty of collectors who buy this and jerkfaces based on hype$ and not particularly cuz of the image, tho they may like it, but if it had another name on it they wouldn't consider it. *shrugs* Invader - hype - haha
agree, no hype for Invader I'm afraid, it has been earned.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Invader Versailles Print , by Deleted on Jan 4, 2019 16:20:20 GMT 1, tho i like invaders stuff i do agree 1700 for the image is just...branding of the name... A la Supreme. Though as long as there is a market. If this same image was released by,let's say munk1, no one would even consider it because there is no meat on the bone..i know plenty of collectors who buy this and jerkfaces based on hype$ and not particularly cuz of the image, tho they may like it, but if it had another name on it they wouldn't consider it. *shrugs* Invader - hype - haha
i agree as well, but not 1700 agree..for this image. There's a line that needs to be drawn by the consumers. To each it's own tho'.
tho i like invaders stuff i do agree 1700 for the image is just...branding of the name... A la Supreme. Though as long as there is a market. If this same image was released by,let's say munk1, no one would even consider it because there is no meat on the bone..i know plenty of collectors who buy this and jerkfaces based on hype$ and not particularly cuz of the image, tho they may like it, but if it had another name on it they wouldn't consider it. *shrugs* Invader - hype - haha
i agree as well, but not 1700 agree..for this image. There's a line that needs to be drawn by the consumers. To each it's own tho'.
|
|
|
Invader Versailles Print , by touchdowntodd on Jan 4, 2019 16:38:28 GMT 1, Retail was 1.5... California crazy taxes are to blame for the rest
Same price he's been at for a couple years
Like the image or not, that's the truth...
And I realize most hate. But I for one enjoy the Zelda, 8 bit video game feel along with the hidden invader, and the decent size and embossing...
Retail was 1.5... California crazy taxes are to blame for the rest
Same price he's been at for a couple years
Like the image or not, that's the truth...
And I realize most hate. But I for one enjoy the Zelda, 8 bit video game feel along with the hidden invader, and the decent size and embossing...
|
|
jay4077
New Member
🗨️ 231
👍🏻 218
May 2017
|
Invader Versailles Print , by jay4077 on Jan 4, 2019 17:04:14 GMT 1, [...] But I for one enjoy the Zelda, 8 bit video game feel along with the hidden invader, and the decent size and embossing... I agree, but still the image isn't strong enough to put on the wall.
And the face on the art police if I ever suggested to hang such an image ... priceless!
[...] But I for one enjoy the Zelda, 8 bit video game feel along with the hidden invader, and the decent size and embossing... I agree, but still the image isn't strong enough to put on the wall.
And the face on the art police if I ever suggested to hang such an image ... priceless!
|
|
Inknart
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,490
👍🏻 3,288
April 2015
|
Invader Versailles Print , by Inknart on Jan 4, 2019 17:05:36 GMT 1, [...] But I for one enjoy the Zelda, 8 bit video game feel along with the hidden invader, and the decent size and embossing... I agree, but still the image isn't strong enough to put on the wall.
And the face on the art police if I ever suggested to hang such an image ... priceless! I guess i'm one of the people who disagrees and really like this image, it has even grown on me more since picking it up. Looking forward to getting creative with framing at some point this year. I may try to find a nice old mirror and gut it to make a frame for this print if i can find one that compliments well enough and do a circular glass frame and matte.
[...] But I for one enjoy the Zelda, 8 bit video game feel along with the hidden invader, and the decent size and embossing... I agree, but still the image isn't strong enough to put on the wall.
And the face on the art police if I ever suggested to hang such an image ... priceless! I guess i'm one of the people who disagrees and really like this image, it has even grown on me more since picking it up. Looking forward to getting creative with framing at some point this year. I may try to find a nice old mirror and gut it to make a frame for this print if i can find one that compliments well enough and do a circular glass frame and matte.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Invader Versailles Print , by Deleted on Jan 4, 2019 19:44:50 GMT 1, I agree, but still the image isn't strong enough to put on the wall.
And the face on the art police if I ever suggested to hang such an image ... priceless! I guess i'm one of the people who disagrees and really like this image, it has even grown on me more since picking it up. Looking forward to getting creative with framing at some point this year. I may try to find a nice old mirror and gut it to make a frame for this print if i can find one that compliments well enough and do a circular glass frame and matte.
"it has even grown on me more since picking it up" the longer you listen, the sweeter the pitch..saying can be adapted to visual stimuli. Before I buy I ask myself "if xyz was the artist, would you still buy?" One of the many fail safe questions I ask myself to prevent impulse buying
I agree, but still the image isn't strong enough to put on the wall.
And the face on the art police if I ever suggested to hang such an image ... priceless! I guess i'm one of the people who disagrees and really like this image, it has even grown on me more since picking it up. Looking forward to getting creative with framing at some point this year. I may try to find a nice old mirror and gut it to make a frame for this print if i can find one that compliments well enough and do a circular glass frame and matte. "it has even grown on me more since picking it up" the longer you listen, the sweeter the pitch..saying can be adapted to visual stimuli. Before I buy I ask myself "if xyz was the artist, would you still buy?" One of the many fail safe questions I ask myself to prevent impulse buying
|
|
|
19818914
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,337
👍🏻 1,029
October 2018
|
Invader Versailles Print , by 19818914 on Jan 4, 2019 20:01:38 GMT 1, I guess i'm one of the people who disagrees and really like this image, it has even grown on me more since picking it up. Looking forward to getting creative with framing at some point this year. I may try to find a nice old mirror and gut it to make a frame for this print if i can find one that compliments well enough and do a circular glass frame and matte. "it has even grown on me more since picking it up" the longer you listen, the sweeter the pitch..saying can be adapted to visual stimuli. Before I buy I ask myself "if xyz was the artist, would you still buy?" One of the many fail safe questions I ask myself to prevent impulse buying
I’m so impressed!!!! People will buy what they want for whatever reason they want. You don’t like it. He does. Who gives a shit?
I guess i'm one of the people who disagrees and really like this image, it has even grown on me more since picking it up. Looking forward to getting creative with framing at some point this year. I may try to find a nice old mirror and gut it to make a frame for this print if i can find one that compliments well enough and do a circular glass frame and matte. "it has even grown on me more since picking it up" the longer you listen, the sweeter the pitch..saying can be adapted to visual stimuli. Before I buy I ask myself "if xyz was the artist, would you still buy?" One of the many fail safe questions I ask myself to prevent impulse buying I’m so impressed!!!! People will buy what they want for whatever reason they want. You don’t like it. He does. Who gives a shit?
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Invader Versailles Print , by Deleted on Jan 4, 2019 20:16:20 GMT 1, "it has even grown on me more since picking it up" the longer you listen, the sweeter the pitch..saying can be adapted to visual stimuli. Before I buy I ask myself "if xyz was the artist, would you still buy?" One of the many fail safe questions I ask myself to prevent impulse buying I’m so impressed!!!! People will buy what they want for whatever reason they want. You don’t like it. He does. Who gives as**t?
sorry didnt mean to come off as a weiner, just that some1 has to start doing something about this bubble, few ppl know it is there but no1 wants to speak up in preventing it...like i said i'm glad he/she/the human(itsliberal2019) likes it, but would it feel the same if it was not invader. ? .
"it has even grown on me more since picking it up" the longer you listen, the sweeter the pitch..saying can be adapted to visual stimuli. Before I buy I ask myself "if xyz was the artist, would you still buy?" One of the many fail safe questions I ask myself to prevent impulse buying I’m so impressed!!!! People will buy what they want for whatever reason they want. You don’t like it. He does. Who gives as**t? sorry didnt mean to come off as a weiner, just that some1 has to start doing something about this bubble, few ppl know it is there but no1 wants to speak up in preventing it...like i said i'm glad he/she/the human(itsliberal2019) likes it, but would it feel the same if it was not invader. ? .
|
|
|
19818914
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,337
👍🏻 1,029
October 2018
|
Invader Versailles Print , by 19818914 on Jan 4, 2019 20:46:05 GMT 1, I’m so impressed!!!! People will buy what they want for whatever reason they want. You don’t like it. He does. Who gives as**t? sorry didnt mean to come off as a weiner, just that some1 has to start doing something about this bubble, few ppl know it is there but no1 wants to speak up in preventing it...like i said i'm glad he/she/the human(itsliberal2019) likes it, but would it feel the same if it was not invader. ? .
Ok. I can see how things written online can be read differently than intended.
Sure. This very well could be a bubble but we are all adults here. We accept the consequences of our actions and purchases.
Invader is an incredibly popular artist. His followers are obsessive, widespread, and dedicated. His prints may not speak to everyone but I can see there being more than 300 people in the world who would want that mirror print. We shall see.
I’m so impressed!!!! People will buy what they want for whatever reason they want. You don’t like it. He does. Who gives as**t? sorry didnt mean to come off as a weiner, just that some1 has to start doing something about this bubble, few ppl know it is there but no1 wants to speak up in preventing it...like i said i'm glad he/she/the human(itsliberal2019) likes it, but would it feel the same if it was not invader. ? . Ok. I can see how things written online can be read differently than intended. Sure. This very well could be a bubble but we are all adults here. We accept the consequences of our actions and purchases. Invader is an incredibly popular artist. His followers are obsessive, widespread, and dedicated. His prints may not speak to everyone but I can see there being more than 300 people in the world who would want that mirror print. We shall see.
|
|
|
Invader Versailles Print , by wetworks on Jan 6, 2019 1:49:53 GMT 1, Invader is an incredibly popular artist. His followers are obsessive, widespread, and dedicated. His prints may not speak to everyone but I can see there being more than 300 people in the world who would want that mirror print. We shall see. Who are these collectors you're referring to? Majority of the people that bought his recent releases were flippers, am I right? If there were 300 real collectors trying to add these to their collection prices won't be trending down. Enjoy making that $500 2-3 years down the road. Definitely killed it lol
Invader is an incredibly popular artist. His followers are obsessive, widespread, and dedicated. His prints may not speak to everyone but I can see there being more than 300 people in the world who would want that mirror print. We shall see. Who are these collectors you're referring to? Majority of the people that bought his recent releases were flippers, am I right? If there were 300 real collectors trying to add these to their collection prices won't be trending down. Enjoy making that $500 2-3 years down the road. Definitely killed it lol
|
|
19818914
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,337
👍🏻 1,029
October 2018
|
Invader Versailles Print , by 19818914 on Jan 6, 2019 2:16:30 GMT 1, Invader is an incredibly popular artist. His followers are obsessive, widespread, and dedicated. His prints may not speak to everyone but I can see there being more than 300 people in the world who would want that mirror print. We shall see. Who are these collectors you're referring to? Majority of the people that bought his recent releases were flippers, am I right? If there were 300 real collectors trying to add these to their collection prices won't be trending down. Enjoy making that $500 2-3 years down the road. Definitely killed it lol
You have me mistaken; I am a genuine collector. Invader's show in Los Angeles gave me an opportunity to purchase his prints at cost. I waited hours for his first release and I agree: most of the people in line were flippers. During the course of his show, Invader released 7 prints and 1 kit. Most of his collectors are not in a financial position to immediately purchase 7 of his prints and a kit, even at retail cost. You may be absolutely right that these prints only fetch $500 over retail 3 years from now- or even less. Invader may continue to release more prints in 2019. I think his collectors are not only recovering from their recent purchases but also exercising restraint in case he's decided to rival Shepard Fairey's print release schedule. We shall see.
Invader is an incredibly popular artist. His followers are obsessive, widespread, and dedicated. His prints may not speak to everyone but I can see there being more than 300 people in the world who would want that mirror print. We shall see. Who are these collectors you're referring to? Majority of the people that bought his recent releases were flippers, am I right? If there were 300 real collectors trying to add these to their collection prices won't be trending down. Enjoy making that $500 2-3 years down the road. Definitely killed it lol You have me mistaken; I am a genuine collector. Invader's show in Los Angeles gave me an opportunity to purchase his prints at cost. I waited hours for his first release and I agree: most of the people in line were flippers. During the course of his show, Invader released 7 prints and 1 kit. Most of his collectors are not in a financial position to immediately purchase 7 of his prints and a kit, even at retail cost. You may be absolutely right that these prints only fetch $500 over retail 3 years from now- or even less. Invader may continue to release more prints in 2019. I think his collectors are not only recovering from their recent purchases but also exercising restraint in case he's decided to rival Shepard Fairey's print release schedule. We shall see.
|
|
|
Invader Versailles Print , by Fast Eddie on Jan 6, 2019 4:40:07 GMT 1, The 8bit pixellation really shows wonderfully in the gold embossing of the print. The Sunset Gold also carries that, with a stronger image, in my opinion. To a certain extent gold is really not a color for the street and Street Art tends to use it systematically to denigrate museum art (think of Banksy's frames). That could have been part of the decision of going for these specific images in these releases.
The 8bit pixellation really shows wonderfully in the gold embossing of the print. The Sunset Gold also carries that, with a stronger image, in my opinion. To a certain extent gold is really not a color for the street and Street Art tends to use it systematically to denigrate museum art (think of Banksy's frames). That could have been part of the decision of going for these specific images in these releases.
|
|
pada1
New Member
🗨️ 628
👍🏻 427
August 2012
|
Invader Versailles Print , by pada1 on Jan 6, 2019 4:57:08 GMT 1, Who are these collectors you're referring to? Majority of the people that bought his recent releases were flippers, am I right? If there were 300 real collectors trying to add these to their collection prices won't be trending down. Enjoy making that $500 2-3 years down the road. Definitely killed it lol You have me mistaken; I am a genuine collector. Invader's show in Los Angeles gave me an opportunity to purchase his prints at cost. I waited hours for his first release and I agree: most of the people in line were flippers. During the course of his show, Invader released 7 prints and 1 kit. Most of his collectors are not in a financial position to immediately purchase 7 of his prints and a kit, even at retail cost. You may be absolutely right that these prints only fetch $500 over retail 3 years from now- or even less. Invader may continue to release more prints in 2019. I think his collectors are not only recovering from their recent purchases but also exercising restraint in case he's decided to rival Shepard Fairey's print release schedule. We shall see. Everyone collect in a different way, for a different purpose. Stepping back on this 7-prints+1-kit period, I think one of the source of frustration is not the number of prints released but that some collectors like to own everything from a given popular artist. In such case, the releases made nearly impossible for someone to get them all at cost. I see the 7 prints as 3 actually, with their variants. 3 prints released as part of "US tour" is not that shocking. If I remember well, he released 3 prints as well in HK (kungfu, explosion, scooter). So it's probably not to be seen as an acceleration of release but more the way OTI and Invader handles his exhibition.
Who are these collectors you're referring to? Majority of the people that bought his recent releases were flippers, am I right? If there were 300 real collectors trying to add these to their collection prices won't be trending down. Enjoy making that $500 2-3 years down the road. Definitely killed it lol You have me mistaken; I am a genuine collector. Invader's show in Los Angeles gave me an opportunity to purchase his prints at cost. I waited hours for his first release and I agree: most of the people in line were flippers. During the course of his show, Invader released 7 prints and 1 kit. Most of his collectors are not in a financial position to immediately purchase 7 of his prints and a kit, even at retail cost. You may be absolutely right that these prints only fetch $500 over retail 3 years from now- or even less. Invader may continue to release more prints in 2019. I think his collectors are not only recovering from their recent purchases but also exercising restraint in case he's decided to rival Shepard Fairey's print release schedule. We shall see. Everyone collect in a different way, for a different purpose. Stepping back on this 7-prints+1-kit period, I think one of the source of frustration is not the number of prints released but that some collectors like to own everything from a given popular artist. In such case, the releases made nearly impossible for someone to get them all at cost. I see the 7 prints as 3 actually, with their variants. 3 prints released as part of "US tour" is not that shocking. If I remember well, he released 3 prints as well in HK (kungfu, explosion, scooter). So it's probably not to be seen as an acceleration of release but more the way OTI and Invader handles his exhibition.
|
|
|
pada1
New Member
🗨️ 628
👍🏻 427
August 2012
|
Invader Versailles Print , by pada1 on Jan 6, 2019 5:11:46 GMT 1, But more importantly, we should probably not debate here and pollute aibohphobia 's sale post!
But more importantly, we should probably not debate here and pollute aibohphobia 's sale post!
|
|
19818914
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,337
👍🏻 1,029
October 2018
|
Invader Versailles Print , by 19818914 on Jan 6, 2019 5:17:43 GMT 1, You have me mistaken; I am a genuine collector. Invader's show in Los Angeles gave me an opportunity to purchase his prints at cost. I waited hours for his first release and I agree: most of the people in line were flippers. During the course of his show, Invader released 7 prints and 1 kit. Most of his collectors are not in a financial position to immediately purchase 7 of his prints and a kit, even at retail cost. You may be absolutely right that these prints only fetch $500 over retail 3 years from now- or even less. Invader may continue to release more prints in 2019. I think his collectors are not only recovering from their recent purchases but also exercising restraint in case he's decided to rival Shepard Fairey's print release schedule. We shall see. Everyone collect in a different way, for a different purpose. Stepping back on this 7-prints+1-kit period, I think one of the source of frustration is not the number of prints released but that some collectors like to own everything from a given popular artist. In such case, the releases made nearly impossible for someone to get them all at cost. I see the 7 prints as 3 actually, with their variants. 3 prints released as part of "US tour" is not that shocking. If I remember well, he released 3 prints as well in HK (kungfu, explosion, scooter). So it's probably not to be seen as an acceleration of release but more the way OTI and Invader handles his exhibition.
To be clear. I’m not against what Invader and OTI did- with exception to how the complex con release went down. I was responding to his point that if there were collectors that wanted the new prints, then prices would be going up and not down. A bunch of prints-variants were released- and then the essential kit came along. People are depleted of funds and some of the resellers are desperate for their money back. Prices go down because of this but it’s only temporarily unless the releases keep coming.
You have me mistaken; I am a genuine collector. Invader's show in Los Angeles gave me an opportunity to purchase his prints at cost. I waited hours for his first release and I agree: most of the people in line were flippers. During the course of his show, Invader released 7 prints and 1 kit. Most of his collectors are not in a financial position to immediately purchase 7 of his prints and a kit, even at retail cost. You may be absolutely right that these prints only fetch $500 over retail 3 years from now- or even less. Invader may continue to release more prints in 2019. I think his collectors are not only recovering from their recent purchases but also exercising restraint in case he's decided to rival Shepard Fairey's print release schedule. We shall see. Everyone collect in a different way, for a different purpose. Stepping back on this 7-prints+1-kit period, I think one of the source of frustration is not the number of prints released but that some collectors like to own everything from a given popular artist. In such case, the releases made nearly impossible for someone to get them all at cost. I see the 7 prints as 3 actually, with their variants. 3 prints released as part of "US tour" is not that shocking. If I remember well, he released 3 prints as well in HK (kungfu, explosion, scooter). So it's probably not to be seen as an acceleration of release but more the way OTI and Invader handles his exhibition. To be clear. I’m not against what Invader and OTI did- with exception to how the complex con release went down. I was responding to his point that if there were collectors that wanted the new prints, then prices would be going up and not down. A bunch of prints-variants were released- and then the essential kit came along. People are depleted of funds and some of the resellers are desperate for their money back. Prices go down because of this but it’s only temporarily unless the releases keep coming.
|
|
Inknart
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,490
👍🏻 3,288
April 2015
|
Invader Versailles Print , by Inknart on Apr 17, 2019 16:49:13 GMT 1, Invader Invasion Kit 18 - $3899 (I paid $4,219 and can provide transaction receipt)
Invader - Black Versailles - Cost - SOLD
Invader - Blue Versailles - Blue - $2250 - What I paid with Receipt.
Invader Invasion Kit 18 - $3899 (I paid $4,219 and can provide transaction receipt) Invader - Black Versailles - Cost - SOLD Invader - Blue Versailles - Blue - $2250 - What I paid with Receipt.
|
|
lv90210
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,030
👍🏻 1,926
January 2018
|
Invader Versailles Print , by lv90210 on Apr 17, 2019 16:58:03 GMT 1, these are $3.4/$3.5k now.
these are $3.4/$3.5k now.
|
|
Inknart
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,490
👍🏻 3,288
April 2015
|
Invader Versailles Print , by Inknart on Apr 17, 2019 17:10:01 GMT 1, these are $3.4/$3.5k now. Where? I don't see any for that price, anywhere. And see them selling for more than what i've put this up for.
And just checked sold listing on ebay with 0 under 4k.
these are $3.4/$3.5k now. Where? I don't see any for that price, anywhere. And see them selling for more than what i've put this up for. And just checked sold listing on ebay with 0 under 4k.
|
|
|
Invader Versailles Print , by touchdowntodd on Apr 17, 2019 17:13:27 GMT 1, these are $3.4/$3.5k now. Where? I don't see any for that price, anywhere. And see them selling for more than what i've put this up for. And just checked sold listing on ebay with 0 under 4k.
Perhaps he means Euro or pounds?
these are $3.4/$3.5k now. Where? I don't see any for that price, anywhere. And see them selling for more than what i've put this up for. And just checked sold listing on ebay with 0 under 4k. Perhaps he means Euro or pounds?
|
|
chevyav53
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,356
👍🏻 1,134
August 2017
|
Invader Versailles Print , by chevyav53 on Apr 17, 2019 17:43:57 GMT 1, Not sure how something a 4 year old can remake in a sitting is worth 4k?
Not sure how something a 4 year old can remake in a sitting is worth 4k?
|
|
Inknart
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,490
👍🏻 3,288
April 2015
|
Invader Versailles Print , by Inknart on Apr 17, 2019 17:48:20 GMT 1, Not sure how something a 4 year old can remake in a sitting is worth 4k? I'm not sure why you need to s**t on peoples sales threads? It's rude and uncalled for.
Seriously, it's getting ridiculous how many people on here feel the need to try and berate everything.
It's not your place to add your opinion within my Sales Thread. If you want to add your opinion on a piece or artist go to there sub category and start a discussion.
$3999 USD is the price i'm asking. I paid $4219 with receipt. Price is firm and fair as far as i'm concerned.
Not sure how something a 4 year old can remake in a sitting is worth 4k? I'm not sure why you need to s**t on peoples sales threads? It's rude and uncalled for. Seriously, it's getting ridiculous how many people on here feel the need to try and berate everything. It's not your place to add your opinion within my Sales Thread. If you want to add your opinion on a piece or artist go to there sub category and start a discussion. $3999 USD is the price i'm asking. I paid $4219 with receipt. Price is firm and fair as far as i'm concerned.
|
|