EHC
New Member
π¨οΈ 366
ππ» 13
October 2006
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by EHC on Feb 28, 2008 18:15:52 GMT 1, Whats the deal with whether or not its been screened vs. stenciled? Does it make that big a difference?
Whats the deal with whether or not its been screened vs. stenciled? Does it make that big a difference?
|
|
|
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by graffoto on Feb 28, 2008 18:28:31 GMT 1, For those who missed the Banksy pieces - here is a list of all sotheby's Banksy sales to date: a good read 
tinyurl.com/354kgn
For those who missed the Banksy pieces - here is a list of all sotheby's Banksy sales to date: a good read tinyurl.com/354kgn |
|
afroken
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,018
ππ» 29
February 2009
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by afroken on Feb 28, 2008 19:04:01 GMT 1, Whats the deal with whether or not its been screened vs. stenciled? Does it make that big a difference?
Not really. Just interested in the technique. Is that a problem?
Whats the deal with whether or not its been screened vs. stenciled? Does it make that big a difference? Not really. Just interested in the technique. Is that a problem? |
|
EHC
New Member
π¨οΈ 366
ππ» 13
October 2006
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by EHC on Feb 28, 2008 19:08:53 GMT 1, i just didn't know if it mattered. thats all
i just didn't know if it mattered. thats all
|
|
afroken
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,018
ππ» 29
February 2009
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by afroken on Feb 28, 2008 19:11:06 GMT 1, Mattered to what? Its value? I don't think it makes any difference at all.
Mattered to what? Its value? I don't think it makes any difference at all.
|
|
|
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by dave313perry on Feb 28, 2008 19:22:29 GMT 1, if its screened it could have been pulled by anyone, if its hand sprayed then thats usually by the artist - so IMO it can and does make a massive difference to its value
if its screened it could have been pulled by anyone, if its hand sprayed then thats usually by the artist - so IMO it can and does make a massive difference to its value
|
|
|
|
afroken
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,018
ππ» 29
February 2009
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by afroken on Feb 28, 2008 19:28:52 GMT 1, Doesn't seem to have harmed Warhol's prices!
Much like Warhol, screen printing is central to Faile's work (it's what they do), so whilst I agree with you in most instances, I don't think it's the case here.
Doesn't seem to have harmed Warhol's prices!
Much like Warhol, screen printing is central to Faile's work (it's what they do), so whilst I agree with you in most instances, I don't think it's the case here.
|
|
rkitek
New Member
π¨οΈ 867
ππ» 143
December 2006
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by rkitek on Feb 28, 2008 20:05:04 GMT 1, My understanding is that Faile has stenciled alot fewer pieces than screen printed. If that's the case, the stenciled work should be more valuable.
My understanding is that Faile has stenciled alot fewer pieces than screen printed. If that's the case, the stenciled work should be more valuable.
|
|
|
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by ricosg11 on Feb 28, 2008 20:14:21 GMT 1, well, for new original work the screened/painted canvas' are a bit more money than anything thats stenciled. fwiw
well, for new original work the screened/painted canvas' are a bit more money than anything thats stenciled. fwiw
|
|
EHC
New Member
π¨οΈ 366
ππ» 13
October 2006
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by EHC on Feb 28, 2008 20:54:07 GMT 1, Mattered to what? Its value? I don't think it makes any difference at all.
Anything really. Just wondering what all the hubub was about.
Never really paid too much attention to it but I guess I do prefer the stenciled look.
Do you think its possible that the box was listed as 2 pieces because they consider it 2 pieces with an image on the front and back? Seems strange to me that they wouldn't show the other side of the boxes otherwise.
Mattered to what? Its value? I don't think it makes any difference at all. Anything really. Just wondering what all the hubub was about. Never really paid too much attention to it but I guess I do prefer the stenciled look. Do you think its possible that the box was listed as 2 pieces because they consider it 2 pieces with an image on the front and back? Seems strange to me that they wouldn't show the other side of the boxes otherwise. |
|
solar77
New Member
π¨οΈ 365
ππ» 9
May 2007
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by solar77 on Feb 28, 2008 21:06:59 GMT 1, No, I watched it live. It was 2 boxes. They didn't turn them around either, so I have no idea what was on the reverse.
No, I watched it live. It was 2 boxes. They didn't turn them around either, so I have no idea what was on the reverse.
|
|
motor
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,839
ππ» 411
December 2006
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by motor on Feb 28, 2008 22:09:25 GMT 1, No, I watched it live. It was 2 boxes. They didn't turn them around either, so I have no idea what was on the reverse.
Yes two boxes from NYC exhibition.
NYC 87: THE SAVAGE WORLD and NOTHING LASTS FOREVER
NYC 80: CAPTIVATING STORIES OF LOVE and half of BUTTERFLY GIRL
And it was acrylic and silkscreen on wood
No, I watched it live. It was 2 boxes. They didn't turn them around either, so I have no idea what was on the reverse. Yes two boxes from NYC exhibition. NYC 87: THE SAVAGE WORLD and NOTHING LASTS FOREVER NYC 80: CAPTIVATING STORIES OF LOVE and half of BUTTERFLY GIRL And it was acrylic and silkscreen on wood |
|
rkitek
New Member
π¨οΈ 867
ππ» 143
December 2006
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by rkitek on Feb 28, 2008 22:14:23 GMT 1, Makes me really wish I hadn't let this one go:
Makes me really wish I hadn't let this one go: |
|
Michael Jacob
Artist
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 2,049
ππ» 29
October 2006
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by Michael Jacob on Feb 28, 2008 22:17:23 GMT 1, UGH, I had two boxes. I decided against them and gave them to a forum member for cost.
UGH, I had two boxes. I decided against them and gave them to a forum member for cost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by bobbymeachamjr on Feb 28, 2008 22:58:25 GMT 1, I like the black/white ones. Very bold. The single color stroke ones are just flat. Same for their prints...
I like the black/white ones. Very bold. The single color stroke ones are just flat. Same for their prints...
|
|
|
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by Guest on Feb 28, 2008 23:01:15 GMT 1, you lost a lot of cash
you lost a lot of cash
|
|
rkitek
New Member
π¨οΈ 867
ππ» 143
December 2006
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by rkitek on Feb 28, 2008 23:01:26 GMT 1, My only consolation is that it was let go to help fund a Parla.
My only consolation is that it was let go to help fund a Parla.
|
|
afroken
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,018
ππ» 29
February 2009
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by afroken on Feb 28, 2008 23:30:16 GMT 1, My understanding is that Faile has stenciled alot fewer pieces than screen printed. If that's the case, the stenciled work should be more valuable.
Warhol did a lot less water colour work. Doesn't make it more valuable.
They are screen printers. It's what they do best and it's the work they'll be remembered for, if at all. That's just my opinion of course. I'm not really wild about their stencil work. so guess I'm biased 
My understanding is that Faile has stenciled alot fewer pieces than screen printed. If that's the case, the stenciled work should be more valuable. Warhol did a lot less water colour work. Doesn't make it more valuable. They are screen printers. It's what they do best and it's the work they'll be remembered for, if at all. That's just my opinion of course. I'm not really wild about their stencil work. so guess I'm biased |
|
|
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by ricosg11 on Feb 28, 2008 23:32:55 GMT 1, agreed
My understanding is that Faile has stenciled alot fewer pieces than screen printed. If that's the case, the stenciled work should be more valuable. Warhol did a lot less water colour work. Doesn't make it more valuable. They are screen printers. It's what they do best and it's the work they'll be remembered for, if at all. That's just my opinion of course. I'm not really wild about their stencil work. so guess I'm biased
agreed My understanding is that Faile has stenciled alot fewer pieces than screen printed. If that's the case, the stenciled work should be more valuable. Warhol did a lot less water colour work. Doesn't make it more valuable. They are screen printers. It's what they do best and it's the work they'll be remembered for, if at all. That's just my opinion of course. I'm not really wild about their stencil work. so guess I'm biased |
|
rkitek
New Member
π¨οΈ 867
ππ» 143
December 2006
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by rkitek on Feb 28, 2008 23:35:29 GMT 1, I completely understand. Of course, I'm probably biased as I have an original stencil from them that's on paper dating from 2005. Mind you, it's also on top of an older screenprint and is painted too.
I completely understand. Of course, I'm probably biased as I have an original stencil from them that's on paper dating from 2005. Mind you, it's also on top of an older screenprint and is painted too.
|
|
afroken
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,018
ππ» 29
February 2009
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by afroken on Feb 28, 2008 23:50:11 GMT 1, I completely understand. Of course, I'm probably biased as I have an original stencil from them that's on paper dating from 2005. Mind you, it's also on top of an older screenprint and is painted too.
You selling? ;D
I completely understand. Of course, I'm probably biased as I have an original stencil from them that's on paper dating from 2005. Mind you, it's also on top of an older screenprint and is painted too. You selling? ;D |
|
EHC
New Member
π¨οΈ 366
ππ» 13
October 2006
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by EHC on Feb 28, 2008 23:52:41 GMT 1, Black boxes are dope. I think I probably dig them most. I'd imagine that they have a lot of presence
Black boxes are dope. I think I probably dig them most. I'd imagine that they have a lot of presence
|
|
|
|
rkitek
New Member
π¨οΈ 867
ππ» 143
December 2006
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by rkitek on Feb 28, 2008 23:54:48 GMT 1, I completely understand. Of course, I'm probably biased as I have an original stencil from them that's on paper dating from 2005. Mind you, it's also on top of an older screenprint and is painted too. You selling? ;D
That one I'm holding onto
I completely understand. Of course, I'm probably biased as I have an original stencil from them that's on paper dating from 2005. Mind you, it's also on top of an older screenprint and is painted too. You selling? ;D That one I'm holding onto |
|
|
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by Martin Whatson on Feb 29, 2008 5:27:48 GMT 1, Those two banksy's on board are beautiful!
Anarchy police and a Mona with gunsight in her forhead right?
xxx
Those two banksy's on board are beautiful!
Anarchy police and a Mona with gunsight in her forhead right?
xxx
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by silverfox on Feb 22, 2008 14:51:58 GMT 1, Smackable head, especially the way he introduces the first artists name, piece and year. Apart from that very informative.
Smackable head, especially the way he introduces the first artists name, piece and year. Apart from that very informative.
|
|
pezlow
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 5,388
ππ» 254
January 2007
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by pezlow on Feb 22, 2008 15:53:06 GMT 1, Just come back from a lunchtime viewing trip. I was there for an hour and a half but could have been there all day. I would highly recommend a trip. Apart from the banksys and failes there is loads and loads to see. The three andy warhol self portrait canvasses are simply amazing.
Just come back from a lunchtime viewing trip. I was there for an hour and a half but could have been there all day. I would highly recommend a trip. Apart from the banksys and failes there is loads and loads to see. The three andy warhol self portrait canvasses are simply amazing.
|
|
|
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by Guest on Feb 22, 2008 16:01:02 GMT 1, thanks for the post silky, really interesting
thanks for the post silky, really interesting
|
|
|
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by ejvaze on Feb 22, 2008 18:04:07 GMT 1, Thanks for the reminder I'll be over to view this weekend.
Thanks for the reminder I'll be over to view this weekend.
|
|
Heavyconsumer
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 4,974
ππ» 5
February 2008
|
Sotheby's Art Auctions β’ LONDON π¬π§, by Heavyconsumer on Feb 23, 2008 2:54:38 GMT 1, interesting stuff
interesting stuff
|
|
