|
|
Backward Numbering?, by corblimeylimey on Nov 1, 2006 18:36:39 GMT 1, I'm starting to put one and one together and make 3......
The first Grannies to get into the hands of the people selling on ebay were numbered 290 - 300, then a day or two later another seller receives his number 169. I've only just recieved mine today and I ordered it at about 10:40, it's number is under 50.
Soooooo I'm thinking they've posted all or nearly all out and in a backward fashion, therefore the next print maybe available very soon.
Has anyone else noticed or experienced this backward numbering thing in previous sales?
I'm starting to put one and one together and make 3......
The first Grannies to get into the hands of the people selling on ebay were numbered 290 - 300, then a day or two later another seller receives his number 169. I've only just recieved mine today and I ordered it at about 10:40, it's number is under 50.
Soooooo I'm thinking they've posted all or nearly all out and in a backward fashion, therefore the next print maybe available very soon.
Has anyone else noticed or experienced this backward numbering thing in previous sales?
|
|
paul1066
New Member
Posts • 93
Likes • 1
February 2006
|
Backward Numbering?, by paul1066 on Nov 1, 2006 20:21:10 GMT 1, Go mine today as well. Mine is 35 which I am very chuffed with.
I have noticed a couple of small dark marks on my print, on the left, can't tell whether its ink or someting has rubbed it to cause it. I have to say that is not as well protected as other POW prints that I have have had in the past. Its not major, just wandering what people reckon I should do, or am I just being picky!!
Go mine today as well. Mine is 35 which I am very chuffed with.
I have noticed a couple of small dark marks on my print, on the left, can't tell whether its ink or someting has rubbed it to cause it. I have to say that is not as well protected as other POW prints that I have have had in the past. Its not major, just wandering what people reckon I should do, or am I just being picky!!
|
|
|
|
Backward Numbering?, by mcnuts on Nov 1, 2006 21:31:11 GMT 1, I'm starting to put one and one together and make 3...... The first Grannies to get into the hands of the people selling on ebay were numbered 290 - 300, then a day or two later another seller receives his number 169. I've only just recieved mine today and I ordered it at about 10:40, it's number is under 50. Soooooo I'm thinking they've posted all or nearly all out and in a backward fashion, therefore the next print maybe available very soon. Has anyone else noticed or experienced this backward numbering thing in previous sales?
I ordered at around 10:30am and have a print in the 300s
I'm starting to put one and one together and make 3...... The first Grannies to get into the hands of the people selling on ebay were numbered 290 - 300, then a day or two later another seller receives his number 169. I've only just recieved mine today and I ordered it at about 10:40, it's number is under 50. Soooooo I'm thinking they've posted all or nearly all out and in a backward fashion, therefore the next print maybe available very soon. Has anyone else noticed or experienced this backward numbering thing in previous sales? I ordered at around 10:30am and have a print in the 300s |
|
RBK
Junior Member
Posts • 2,924
Likes • 104
September 2006
|
Backward Numbering?, by RBK on Nov 2, 2006 0:05:40 GMT 1, Interesting...
I always thought for the unsigned it was:
1-50 Banksy
51-150 - Barely Legal (which mine is in)
151-500 - POW
Interesting...
I always thought for the unsigned it was:
1-50 Banksy
51-150 - Barely Legal (which mine is in)
151-500 - POW
|
|
trowel
New Member
Posts • 622
Likes • 287
September 2006
|
Backward Numbering?, by trowel on Nov 2, 2006 0:27:46 GMT 1, My Barely Legal Applause is #153...
My Barely Legal Applause is #153...
|
|
|
|
Backward Numbering?, by mido on Nov 2, 2006 1:42:04 GMT 1,
the 1-50 was merely a rumour. It would surely be highly unusual for an artist (or agent etc) to keep 50 prints, especially unsigned ones.
don't believe every crackpot idea you hear. ;D
Interesting... I always thought for the unsigned it was: 1-50 Banksy 51-150 - Barely Legal (which mine is in) 151-500 - POW
the 1-50 was merely a rumour. It would surely be highly unusual for an artist (or agent etc) to keep 50 prints, especially unsigned ones. don't believe every crackpot idea you hear. ;D Interesting... I always thought for the unsigned it was: 1-50 Banksy 51-150 - Barely Legal (which mine is in) 151-500 - POW |
|
|
|
|
|
Backward Numbering?, by mido on Nov 2, 2006 1:46:00 GMT 1, there is nothing to compare this with as there has been nothing like this before (i.e. a print selling out in an hour or so, then all being sent out over the next 4 days or so)
Mine went through about 9.55m and was number 260 something, so bang goes that theory ;-)
I'm starting to put one and one together and make 3...... The first Grannies to get into the hands of the people selling on ebay were numbered 290 - 300, then a day or two later another seller receives his number 169. I've only just recieved mine today and I ordered it at about 10:40, it's number is under 50. Soooooo I'm thinking they've posted all or nearly all out and in a backward fashion, therefore the next print maybe available very soon. Has anyone else noticed or experienced this backward numbering thing in previous sales?
there is nothing to compare this with as there has been nothing like this before (i.e. a print selling out in an hour or so, then all being sent out over the next 4 days or so) Mine went through about 9.55m and was number 260 something, so bang goes that theory ;-) I'm starting to put one and one together and make 3...... The first Grannies to get into the hands of the people selling on ebay were numbered 290 - 300, then a day or two later another seller receives his number 169. I've only just recieved mine today and I ordered it at about 10:40, it's number is under 50. Soooooo I'm thinking they've posted all or nearly all out and in a backward fashion, therefore the next print maybe available very soon. Has anyone else noticed or experienced this backward numbering thing in previous sales? |
|
paul1066
New Member
Posts • 93
Likes • 1
February 2006
|
Backward Numbering?, by paul1066 on Nov 2, 2006 10:41:48 GMT 1, My order confirmation came through at 10.08, so its all looking rather random, how odd!!
My order confirmation came through at 10.08, so its all looking rather random, how odd!!
|
|
smashedhat
New Member
Posts • 141
Likes • 0
October 2006
|
Backward Numbering?, by smashedhat on Nov 2, 2006 12:18:32 GMT 1, POW probably read this forum and change their posting strategy just ot keep us on our feet.
POW probably read this forum and change their posting strategy just ot keep us on our feet.
|
|
paul1066
New Member
Posts • 93
Likes • 1
February 2006
|
Backward Numbering?, by paul1066 on Nov 2, 2006 12:38:51 GMT 1, It would suprise me if they have time to be reading the forums, far to many tubes to be sent out!!
It would suprise me if they have time to be reading the forums, far to many tubes to be sent out!!
|
|
|
|
Backward Numbering?, by Daniel Silk on Nov 2, 2006 13:18:49 GMT 1, It would suprise me if they have time to be reading the forums, far to many tubes to be sent out!!
ahhhhh  they do! POW, Lazinc, and many of the artists some under anonymous names 
It would suprise me if they have time to be reading the forums, far to many tubes to be sent out!! ahhhhh they do! POW, Lazinc, and many of the artists some under anonymous names |
|
paul1066
New Member
Posts • 93
Likes • 1
February 2006
|
Backward Numbering?, by paul1066 on Nov 2, 2006 13:28:55 GMT 1, Interesting, gathering the views of us mere mortals!!
Interesting, gathering the views of us mere mortals!!
|
|
smashedhat
New Member
Posts • 141
Likes • 0
October 2006
|
Backward Numbering?, by smashedhat on Nov 2, 2006 13:31:07 GMT 1, ahhhhh they do! POW, Lazinc, and many of the artists some under anonymous names
<eyes everyone up suspiciously>
ahhhhh they do! POW, Lazinc, and many of the artists some under anonymous names <eyes everyone up suspiciously> |
|
|
|
Backward Numbering?, by hankpank on Nov 2, 2006 17:09:50 GMT 1, ...some under anonymous names
Now what do you know that I don't? PM me if it's not official. ;D 
...some under anonymous names Now what do you know that I don't? PM me if it's not official. ;D |
|
|
|
|
|
Backward Numbering?, by Daniel Silk on Nov 2, 2006 17:16:12 GMT 1, ...some under anonymous names Now what do you know that I don't? PM me if it's not official. ;D
I think there's a lot that I know that you don't ;D
OK, What film is that line from? ;D
...some under anonymous names Now what do you know that I don't? PM me if it's not official. ;D I think there's a lot that I know that you don't ;D OK, What film is that line from? ;D |
|
notitle
New Member
Posts • 427
Likes • 0
October 2006
|
Backward Numbering?, by notitle on Nov 2, 2006 18:19:03 GMT 1, Mine went through about 9.55m and was number 260 something, so bang goes that theory ;-)
mine went through at 9:59 and is 259 
Mine went through about 9.55m and was number 260 something, so bang goes that theory ;-) mine went through at 9:59 and is 259 |
|
Ågentßacardi
Junior Member
Posts • 2,037
Likes • 16
September 2006
|
Backward Numbering?, by Ågentßacardi on Nov 2, 2006 18:28:39 GMT 1, the 1-50 was merely a rumour. It would surely be highly unusual for an artist (or agent etc) to keep 50 prints, especially unsigned ones.
Actually, a few of us at the LA show heard it from the horse's mouth (so to speak). We were asking the Lazinc lady behind the desk about numbering (she was the one in charge of assigning print numbers on her little Apple Powerbook), and she told us that our prints would start at 51, because the first 50 goes to Banksy.
She was a real nice lady too. The first day that the show opened to the public, she thought that all the show promo cards had been given out to them VIP tools, but she had one in her hand. When I asked her if she had any more, she asked me to step quickly into the office, and snuck her card into my bag, telling me "Shhhh!" 
the 1-50 was merely a rumour. It would surely be highly unusual for an artist (or agent etc) to keep 50 prints, especially unsigned ones. Actually, a few of us at the LA show heard it from the horse's mouth (so to speak). We were asking the Lazinc lady behind the desk about numbering (she was the one in charge of assigning print numbers on her little Apple Powerbook), and she told us that our prints would start at 51, because the first 50 goes to Banksy. She was a real nice lady too. The first day that the show opened to the public, she thought that all the show promo cards had been given out to them VIP tools, but she had one in her hand. When I asked her if she had any more, she asked me to step quickly into the office, and snuck her card into my bag, telling me "Shhhh!" |
|
smashedhat
New Member
Posts • 141
Likes • 0
October 2006
|
Backward Numbering?, by smashedhat on Nov 2, 2006 18:29:53 GMT 1, I think there are blindfolds and/or darts involved in the selection process
I think there are blindfolds and/or darts involved in the selection process
|
|
gm
New Member
Posts • 950
Likes • 15
February 2006
|
Backward Numbering?, by gm on Nov 2, 2006 20:18:16 GMT 1, Perhaps they're sending them out in alphabetical order of buyers' names.
Perhaps they're sending them out in alphabetical order of buyers' names.
|
|
|
|
Backward Numbering?, by hankpank on Nov 2, 2006 23:20:40 GMT 1, I think there's a lot that I know that you don't ;D OK, What film is that line from? ;D
• I know, but I would like to know.
• I don't know
I think there's a lot that I know that you don't ;D OK, What film is that line from? ;D • I know, but I would like to know. • I don't know |
|
they do! POW, Lazinc, and many of the artists 
