|
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by Adam The Collector on Feb 1, 2019 20:36:39 GMT 1, Better would be a gallery at 10-15% commission. 8% or less for that set (eg @ Hang Up)
Better would be a gallery at 10-15% commission. 8% or less for that set (eg @ Hang Up) Agreed, figured I would post worst case scenario. |
|
|
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by Art-is-Art on Feb 17, 2019 20:07:12 GMT 1, Hey Delano - just seen the pics of your new crib.
I now understand why you were looking to sell this set
Hey Delano - just seen the pics of your new crib.
I now understand why you were looking to sell this set
|
|
delano
New Member
🗨️ 423
👍🏻 1,562
September 2006
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by delano on Feb 17, 2019 20:26:12 GMT 1, Hey Delano - just seen the pics of your new crib. I now understand why you were looking to sell this set
Hahaha. I think I put them up for sale the day the bill for my windows landed.
Hey Delano - just seen the pics of your new crib. I now understand why you were looking to sell this set Hahaha. I think I put them up for sale the day the bill for my windows landed. |
|
|
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by bentheartfan on Feb 17, 2019 20:26:43 GMT 1, Definately need more pics of that house !
You should let the buyer of this set have a tour. May help!
Definately need more pics of that house !
You should let the buyer of this set have a tour. May help!
|
|
|
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by Not 4 The Thril on Feb 17, 2019 20:31:07 GMT 1, those are fantastic! what was the original cost of the prints at his show when these were first sold?
those are fantastic! what was the original cost of the prints at his show when these were first sold?
|
|
jp
New Member
🗨️ 431
👍🏻 504
September 2006
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by jp on Feb 17, 2019 22:16:57 GMT 1, those are fantastic! what was the original cost of the prints at his show when these were first sold?
They were $500.00 each. Some people bought full sets and tried flipping them on ebay right away for 5-6k.
those are fantastic! what was the original cost of the prints at his show when these were first sold? They were $500.00 each. Some people bought full sets and tried flipping them on ebay right away for 5-6k. |
|
|
|
|
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by Young Squire on Feb 18, 2019 14:22:38 GMT 1, those are fantastic! what was the original cost of the prints at his show when these were first sold? They were $500.00 each. Some people bought full sets and tried flipping them on ebay right away for 5-6k. Not sure where this guy is based but CGT alone would tempt me to drip feed the sale of these.
EDIT: Just seen this guys house. Doubt CGT applies and if it does that he gives a f! Giveaway...! 
those are fantastic! what was the original cost of the prints at his show when these were first sold? They were $500.00 each. Some people bought full sets and tried flipping them on ebay right away for 5-6k. Not sure where this guy is based but CGT alone would tempt me to drip feed the sale of these.
EDIT: Just seen this guys house. Doubt CGT applies and if it does that he gives a f! Giveaway...!
|
|
|
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by Not 4 The Thril on Feb 19, 2019 19:04:13 GMT 1,
cool video about the printing of these
cool video about the printing of these
|
|
Foolsgold
New Member
🗨️ 871
👍🏻 794
February 2014
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by Foolsgold on Feb 19, 2019 21:19:46 GMT 1, Hey Delano - just seen the pics of your new crib. I now understand why you were looking to sell this set Hahaha. I think I put them up for sale the day the bill for my windows landed.
Random one....is your new gaff in the UK?
Hey Delano - just seen the pics of your new crib. I now understand why you were looking to sell this set Hahaha. I think I put them up for sale the day the bill for my windows landed. Random one....is your new gaff in the UK? |
|
Ruggs
Full Member
🗨️ 8,963
👍🏻 4,581
January 2008
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by Ruggs on Feb 19, 2019 21:23:23 GMT 1, Delano’s gaff is brutal.
Delano’s gaff is brutal.
|
|
delano
New Member
🗨️ 423
👍🏻 1,562
September 2006
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by delano on Feb 19, 2019 22:05:21 GMT 1, Hahaha. I think I put them up for sale the day the bill for my windows landed. Random one....is your new gaff in the UK?
Yes mate
Hahaha. I think I put them up for sale the day the bill for my windows landed. Random one....is your new gaff in the UK? Yes mate |
|
|
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by Poppy Sunshine on Feb 25, 2019 10:58:45 GMT 1, cool video about the printing of these
I noticed the part towards the end where they say there were only 6 signed proof sets embossed with modern multiples logo.
Conclusive proof that mine must be the only unsigned set in the world with the logo on them.
Nice to know but would anyone pay more for that do you think?
cool video about the printing of these Never seen this film before. Really interesting. I noticed the part towards the end where they say there were only 6 signed proof sets embossed with modern multiples logo. Conclusive proof that mine must be the only unsigned set in the world with the logo on them. Nice to know but would anyone pay more for that do you think? |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by Deleted on Feb 25, 2019 11:02:57 GMT 1, cool video about the printing of these Never seen this film before. Really interesting. I noticed the part towards the end where they say there were only 6 signed proof sets embossed with modern multiples logo. Conclusive proof that mine must be the only unsigned set in the world with the logo on them. Nice to know but would anyone pay more for that do you think?
right now its proving difficult to sell a complete set let alone one at a possible premium .
cool video about the printing of these Never seen this film before. Really interesting. I noticed the part towards the end where they say there were only 6 signed proof sets embossed with modern multiples logo. Conclusive proof that mine must be the only unsigned set in the world with the logo on them. Nice to know but would anyone pay more for that do you think? right now its proving difficult to sell a complete set let alone one at a possible premium . |
|
|
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by Poppy Sunshine on Feb 25, 2019 11:15:24 GMT 1, On an individual basis if they were split?
On an individual basis if they were split?
|
|
|
|
Matt
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,358
👍🏻 3,450
September 2014
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by Matt on Feb 25, 2019 11:21:28 GMT 1, On an individual basis if they were split?
cool to have a set from source, all nice prints, but highly doubt MM stamp would add value.
It’s not a Banksy tag or something to that effect, rather another example of inconsistencies in printing from those days, like prints with / without POW stamp
A case of something being rare without being more valuable imo
On an individual basis if they were split? cool to have a set from source, all nice prints, but highly doubt MM stamp would add value. It’s not a Banksy tag or something to that effect, rather another example of inconsistencies in printing from those days, like prints with / without POW stamp A case of something being rare without being more valuable imo |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by Deleted on Feb 25, 2019 11:44:59 GMT 1, On an individual basis if they were split?
i’d think not but you never know as some folks like this sort of variation.
On an individual basis if they were split? i’d think not but you never know as some folks like this sort of variation. |
|
|
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by Poppy Sunshine on Feb 25, 2019 11:50:48 GMT 1, Thanks for the opinions.
Just for clarity it wasn't an accidental stamping but a favour to the previous owner who personally knew the owner of MM.
Thanks for the opinions.
Just for clarity it wasn't an accidental stamping but a favour to the previous owner who personally knew the owner of MM.
|
|
silvermyn
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,612
👍🏻 781
April 2008
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by silvermyn on Feb 25, 2019 15:12:18 GMT 1, Thanks for the opinions. Just for clarity it wasn't an accidental stamping but a favour to the previous owner who personally knew the owner of MM. Interesting one this.
If it was a later addition to the print, and one that the artist wasn't aware of, you could argue that it actually devalues the print? Not my view but just throwing it out there for discussion.
Thanks for the opinions. Just for clarity it wasn't an accidental stamping but a favour to the previous owner who personally knew the owner of MM. Interesting one this.
If it was a later addition to the print, and one that the artist wasn't aware of, you could argue that it actually devalues the print? Not my view but just throwing it out there for discussion.
|
|
|
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by Fast Eddie on Feb 25, 2019 15:29:09 GMT 1, Forgive two probably naive questions.
Can I ask why is the LA version of these prints typically deemed worth more? If the artist were truly happier with the MM versions, why interrupting the edition and redo through POW.
This is not eighteen century tech and the numbering on each print is essentially random. Not indicative of quality. What's the point of having a set? A taste for symmetry in the numbers?
Forgive two probably naive questions.
Can I ask why is the LA version of these prints typically deemed worth more? If the artist were truly happier with the MM versions, why interrupting the edition and redo through POW.
This is not eighteen century tech and the numbering on each print is essentially random. Not indicative of quality. What's the point of having a set? A taste for symmetry in the numbers?
|
|
avec art
Junior Member
🗨️ 3,727
👍🏻 3,061
March 2014
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by avec art on Feb 25, 2019 15:53:59 GMT 1, silk screen printing first appeared in China during the era of Song Dynasty Art (960-1279), and made its way to Europe in the 18th century
silk screen printing first appeared in China during the era of Song Dynasty Art (960-1279), and made its way to Europe in the 18th century
|
|
silvermyn
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,612
👍🏻 781
April 2008
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by silvermyn on Feb 25, 2019 16:59:33 GMT 1, Forgive two probably naive questions. Can I ask why is the LA version of these prints typically deemed worth more? If the artist were truly happier with the MM versions, why interrupting the edition and redo through POW. This is not eighteen century tech and the numbering on each print is essentially random. Not indicative of quality. What's the point of having a set? A taste for symmetry in the numbers? To answer your first question, the quality of the Modern Multiples edition is far superior to the stuff that POW were able to produce. They look better, feel better, smell better and taste better. They're just better. The reason POW would interup is purely control. For example, if somebody had a friend at MM and wanted them to put the blind stamp on a print (see posts above) then they could get away with it. If you asked POW to do the same they would tell you to go take a running jump...
In this instance, the numbering is very much indicative of quality. The first 50 signed and the first 100 of the unsigned were printed by MM. They're better to look at, feel, sniff and nibble at the edges. Given the choice, I'd rather have a set (12/150, 12/150, 12/150, 12/150, 12/150 and 12/150) than a random numbers (12/150 sat next to 22/150, 27/150, 38/150, 42/150 and 44/150). Wouldn't you? Look at this post. Aren't you just aching to have all the 12/150's....? I am! If anyone has them please give them to me!!!
Forgive two probably naive questions. Can I ask why is the LA version of these prints typically deemed worth more? If the artist were truly happier with the MM versions, why interrupting the edition and redo through POW. This is not eighteen century tech and the numbering on each print is essentially random. Not indicative of quality. What's the point of having a set? A taste for symmetry in the numbers? To answer your first question, the quality of the Modern Multiples edition is far superior to the stuff that POW were able to produce. They look better, feel better, smell better and taste better. They're just better. The reason POW would interup is purely control. For example, if somebody had a friend at MM and wanted them to put the blind stamp on a print (see posts above) then they could get away with it. If you asked POW to do the same they would tell you to go take a running jump...
In this instance, the numbering is very much indicative of quality. The first 50 signed and the first 100 of the unsigned were printed by MM. They're better to look at, feel, sniff and nibble at the edges. Given the choice, I'd rather have a set (12/150, 12/150, 12/150, 12/150, 12/150 and 12/150) than a random numbers (12/150 sat next to 22/150, 27/150, 38/150, 42/150 and 44/150). Wouldn't you? Look at this post. Aren't you just aching to have all the 12/150's....? I am! If anyone has them please give them to me!!!
|
|
19818914
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,337
👍🏻 1,029
October 2018
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by 19818914 on Feb 25, 2019 17:41:22 GMT 1, It’s an ocd thing. The right crazy person will bite.
It’s an ocd thing. The right crazy person will bite.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by Jalouse Rosemont on Feb 25, 2019 17:57:25 GMT 1, Forgive two probably naive questions. Can I ask why is the LA version of these prints typically deemed worth more? If the artist were truly happier with the MM versions, why interrupting the edition and redo through POW. This is not eighteen century tech and the numbering on each print is essentially random. Not indicative of quality. What's the point of having a set? A taste for symmetry in the numbers? To answer your first question, the quality of the Modern Multiples edition is far superior to the stuff that POW were able to produce. They look better, feel better, smell better and taste better. They're just better. The reason POW would interup is purely control. For example, if somebody had a friend at MM and wanted them to put the blind stamp on a print (see posts above) then they could get away with it. If you asked POW to do the same they would tell you to go take a running jump...
In this instance, the numbering is very much indicative of quality. The first 50 signed and the first 100 of the unsigned were printed by MM. They're better to look at, feel, sniff and nibble at the edges. Given the choice, I'd rather have a set (12/150, 12/150, 12/150, 12/150, 12/150 and 12/150) than a random numbers (12/150 sat next to 22/150, 27/150, 38/150, 42/150 and 44/150). Wouldn't you? Look at this post. Aren't you just aching to have all the 12/150's....? I am! If anyone has them please give them to me!!!
Forgive two probably naive questions. Can I ask why is the LA version of these prints typically deemed worth more? If the artist were truly happier with the MM versions, why interrupting the edition and redo through POW. This is not eighteen century tech and the numbering on each print is essentially random. Not indicative of quality. What's the point of having a set? A taste for symmetry in the numbers? To answer your first question, the quality of the Modern Multiples edition is far superior to the stuff that POW were able to produce. They look better, feel better, smell better and taste better. They're just better. The reason POW would interup is purely control. For example, if somebody had a friend at MM and wanted them to put the blind stamp on a print (see posts above) then they could get away with it. If you asked POW to do the same they would tell you to go take a running jump...
In this instance, the numbering is very much indicative of quality. The first 50 signed and the first 100 of the unsigned were printed by MM. They're better to look at, feel, sniff and nibble at the edges. Given the choice, I'd rather have a set (12/150, 12/150, 12/150, 12/150, 12/150 and 12/150) than a random numbers (12/150 sat next to 22/150, 27/150, 38/150, 42/150 and 44/150). Wouldn't you? Look at this post. Aren't you just aching to have all the 12/150's....? I am! If anyone has them please give them to me!!!
The Signed LA versions are worth more because they destroyed the originals screens. The POW signed versions are not as detailed. It might be one of many reasons Banksy and Laz decided to go their own separate ways.... |
|
silvermyn
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,612
👍🏻 781
April 2008
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by silvermyn on Feb 25, 2019 18:25:21 GMT 1, To answer your first question, the quality of the Modern Multiples edition is far superior to the stuff that POW were able to produce. They look better, feel better, smell better and taste better. They're just better. The reason POW would interup is purely control. For example, if somebody had a friend at MM and wanted them to put the blind stamp on a print (see posts above) then they could get away with it. If you asked POW to do the same they would tell you to go take a running jump...
In this instance, the numbering is very much indicative of quality. The first 50 signed and the first 100 of the unsigned were printed by MM. They're better to look at, feel, sniff and nibble at the edges. Given the choice, I'd rather have a set (12/150, 12/150, 12/150, 12/150, 12/150 and 12/150) than a random numbers (12/150 sat next to 22/150, 27/150, 38/150, 42/150 and 44/150). Wouldn't you? Look at this post. Aren't you just aching to have all the 12/150's....? I am! If anyone has them please give them to me!!!
The POW signed versions are not as detailed. It might be one of many reasons Banksy and Laz decided to go their own separate ways.... I'm sure that POW would also have destroyed their original screens after the run was completed.
Surely it's not the destruction of the screen that makes any print more valuable, as that is not generally known infromation?
To answer your first question, the quality of the Modern Multiples edition is far superior to the stuff that POW were able to produce. They look better, feel better, smell better and taste better. They're just better. The reason POW would interup is purely control. For example, if somebody had a friend at MM and wanted them to put the blind stamp on a print (see posts above) then they could get away with it. If you asked POW to do the same they would tell you to go take a running jump...
In this instance, the numbering is very much indicative of quality. The first 50 signed and the first 100 of the unsigned were printed by MM. They're better to look at, feel, sniff and nibble at the edges. Given the choice, I'd rather have a set (12/150, 12/150, 12/150, 12/150, 12/150 and 12/150) than a random numbers (12/150 sat next to 22/150, 27/150, 38/150, 42/150 and 44/150). Wouldn't you? Look at this post. Aren't you just aching to have all the 12/150's....? I am! If anyone has them please give them to me!!!
The POW signed versions are not as detailed. It might be one of many reasons Banksy and Laz decided to go their own separate ways.... I'm sure that POW would also have destroyed their original screens after the run was completed.
Surely it's not the destruction of the screen that makes any print more valuable, as that is not generally known infromation? |
|
|
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by Jalouse Rosemont on Feb 25, 2019 18:37:49 GMT 1, The Signed LA versions are worth more because they destroyed the originals screens. The POW signed versions are not as detailed. It might be one of many reasons Banksy and Laz decided to go their own separate ways.... I'm sure that POW would also have destroyed their original screens after the run was completed.
Surely it's not the destruction of the screen that makes any print more valuable, as that is not generally known infromation?  and Modern Multiples had to destroy their screens which is well documented by Mr Brainwash.
One can see the difference putting the same print from POW to Modern Multiples together to see which is more sharper and better. But hey, ho.. . A Banksy print is a Banksy print...
The Signed LA versions are worth more because they destroyed the originals screens. The POW signed versions are not as detailed. It might be one of many reasons Banksy and Laz decided to go their own separate ways.... I'm sure that POW would also have destroyed their original screens after the run was completed.
Surely it's not the destruction of the screen that makes any print more valuable, as that is not generally known infromation? Modern Multiples were assigned to do the run of the 6 LA prints, not POW in-house. "Something happened" and Modern Multiples had to destroy their screens which is well documented by Mr Brainwash. One can see the difference putting the same print from POW to Modern Multiples together to see which is more sharper and better. But hey, ho.. . A Banksy print is a Banksy print... |
|
|
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by Fast Eddie on Feb 25, 2019 18:45:21 GMT 1, I do not intend to derail the sales thread. Take it as a free bump. These are beautiful prints.
[But we are also rational buyers -maybe except silvermyn who gave a new discomforting interpretation to deckle edges]
I do not intend to derail the sales thread. Take it as a free bump. These are beautiful prints. [But we are also rational buyers -maybe except silvermyn who gave a new discomforting interpretation to deckle edges] |
|
|
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by Jalouse Rosemont on Feb 25, 2019 18:47:04 GMT 1, I do not intend to derail the sales thread. Take it as a free bump. These are beautiful prints. [But we are also rational buyers -maybe except silvermyn who gave a new discomforting interpretation to deckle edges]
I do not intend to derail the sales thread. Take it as a free bump. These are beautiful prints. [But we are also rational buyers -maybe except silvermyn who gave a new discomforting interpretation to deckle edges] They are fabulous prints. Good luck with the sale. |
|
tab1
Full Member
🗨️ 8,519
👍🏻 3,679
September 2011
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by tab1 on Feb 25, 2019 19:52:07 GMT 1, The Signed LA versions are worth more because they destroyed the originals screens. The POW signed versions are not as detailed. It might be one of many reasons Banksy and Laz decided to go their own separate ways.... I'm sure that POW would also have destroyed their original screens after the run was completed.
Surely it's not the destruction of the screen that makes any print more valuable, as that is not generally known infromation?
Handy to know as a lot of unscrupulous so called galleries : print shops re print endless amounts if deemed popular
The Signed LA versions are worth more because they destroyed the originals screens. The POW signed versions are not as detailed. It might be one of many reasons Banksy and Laz decided to go their own separate ways.... I'm sure that POW would also have destroyed their original screens after the run was completed.
Surely it's not the destruction of the screen that makes any print more valuable, as that is not generally known infromation? Handy to know as a lot of unscrupulous so called galleries : print shops re print endless amounts if deemed popular |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by Deleted on Feb 25, 2019 20:44:19 GMT 1, I'm sure that POW would also have destroyed their original screens after the run was completed.
Surely it's not the destruction of the screen that makes any print more valuable, as that is not generally known infromation? Handy to know as a lot of unscrupulous so called galleries : print shops re print endless amounts if deemed popular
you wouldn’t know any galleries who do this ?
I'm sure that POW would also have destroyed their original screens after the run was completed.
Surely it's not the destruction of the screen that makes any print more valuable, as that is not generally known infromation? Handy to know as a lot of unscrupulous so called galleries : print shops re print endless amounts if deemed popular you wouldn’t know any galleries who do this ? |
|
irl1
Full Member
🗨️ 9,274
👍🏻 9,381
December 2017
|
Banksy • Festival, Destroy Capitalism, by irl1 on Feb 25, 2019 21:16:13 GMT 1, Handy to know as a lot of unscrupulous so called galleries : print shops re print endless amounts if deemed popular you wouldn’t know any galleries who do this ?
Have a look through some of the banksy works they sell here
www.invaluable.com/catalog/8qiufmp2ul
Handy to know as a lot of unscrupulous so called galleries : print shops re print endless amounts if deemed popular you wouldn’t know any galleries who do this ? You can get a copy of any Banksy from these. They do auctions but have a buy it now Gallery as well. Have a look through some of the banksy works they sell here www.invaluable.com/catalog/8qiufmp2ul |
|
and Modern Multiples had to destroy their screens which is well documented by Mr Brainwash. 
