[vei]

Why would you want to hold on your cart? Just buy it.

[Hubble Bubble]

^^ And before you all reply… I know, it's me!

[mrchristopherrobinso]

I am a little disappointed that the girl being 'unveiled' doesnt have nicer boobies. His other models were much better proportioned. Also, the level of detail on this image seems to be not quite as sharp as his dead meat series?

[Bansky]

Sept 15, 2014 18:34:40 GMT 1 vei said:

Why would you want to hold on your cart? Just buy it.

Just wondering if I need to practise my touch typing 

[Dibbs 45]

Sept 15, 2014 18:34:38 GMT 1 Hubble Bubble said:

Is it me or is it all a bit… Athena ?

I have to say yes I thought that. Along the lines of Salvador Dali posters in the eighties. However part of my brain would not accept it when I looked at it more. I think its the photo. Still a great image and price.

[sky8888]

On a side note, I think the dude on the left is Gaius Baltar

[Icesay]

But what is the meaning of the picture? There seems to be a lot of elements to it or references perhaps....i like to know what is going on, that's what makes it clever or thought provoking...can anyone shed some light?

[Rsyok]

Sept 15, 2014 19:54:37 GMT 1 Icesay said:

But what is the meaning of the picture? There seems to be a lot of elements to it or references perhaps....i like to know what is going on, that's what makes it clever or thought provoking...can anyone shed some light?

Try reading the title ( hint it's a naked bird under a sheet).

[alittle]

I wish this was the print release:

[Deleted]

I wish it was smaller, framing will cost more than the print!

[vei]

Sept 15, 2014 20:10:05 GMT 1 alittle said:

I wish this was the print release:

Yeah that's nice.

[anbesivam1]

Sept 15, 2014 19:54:37 GMT 1 Icesay said:

But what is the meaning of the picture? There seems to be a lot of elements to it or references perhaps....i like to know what is going on, that's what makes it clever or thought provoking...can anyone shed some light?

Great question. I don't have the answer, but only my interpretation.

I think, like any good art, there is room for the viewer to interpret this piece from his/her own perspective.

Having said this, an understanding of the context of Conor's previous bodies of work is important in order to appreciate the symbolism and messages Conor portrays in this piece.

His recent shows "Dead Meat" & "A whole lot of trouble for a little bit of win" gave us an insight in to the themes of empire and the cycles of power important to Conor.

Conor is particularly interested in the transition of the centre of power from the West to the East. Despite his paintings referencing the Baroque period they are very much concerned with our contemporary world. Paintings titled, "Who's World is this?", "When we were kings" and "For Want of a Kingdom, the Battle Was Lost" all reference Europe's economic and political decline in light of the rise of China.

In "The Unveiling", we can see familiar motifs of power the UN flag, a globe, a renaissance bust resting on the floor, the trophy dead pheasant and a table of cornucopia (with the nude female) being unveiled (offered) to the 'emperor' (seated).

Why are the symbols of empire placed on the floor? And symbols of excess / plenty commanding the attention of the protagonist? Is it a reference as to the moral state of our society in the west, that has allowed us to lose our grip on empire? Has decadence led to the fall of the West? 

The flag is vague and the globe is also indistinct, which further lends to my interpretation that the artist feels power is fading in plain sight, whilst the protagonist pays more attention to the 'offering'. 

I would be interested to see the complete body of work for the show, which I am sure would add clarity to interpreting this piece.

What do others think?  



  


 

[Feral Things]

That's really interesting, anbesivam1. I hadn't spotted a lot of the details you mentioned. I do like Conor's inclusion of busts from antiquity to draw parallels with events that befell past empires. In 'Watch Your Palace Fall' the bust of Julius Caesar references historic assassinations and in this piece I would assume from the furrowed brow that the bust depicts Nero who was the ineffectual Roman emperor that 'fiddled while Rome burned.'

[dueuomo]

I really like this and ambesivam1 interpretation!

[jusdeep]

Not so sure about this image. Looks too sharp, precise in places and almost looks like the image has been forced or digitally altered to make it rawer in form. For me it just doesn't seem 'in this image' to have the grittiness of Conor's work or capture the moment or feeling of the subjects. Plus I find the colours used quite unsettling. I'm sure most will disagree but I feel a little disappointed if this is it, even for the reasonable price.

[Coach]

Sept 15, 2014 20:44:56 GMT 1 anbesivam1 said:

Sept 15, 2014 19:54:37 GMT 1 Icesay said:

But what is the meaning of the picture? There seems to be a lot of elements to it or references perhaps....i like to know what is going on, that's what makes it clever or thought provoking...can anyone shed some light?

Great question. I don't have the answer, but only my interpretation.

I think, like any good art, there is room for the viewer to interpret this piece from his/her own perspective.

Having said this, an understanding of the context of Conor's previous bodies of work is important in order to appreciate the symbolism and messages Conor portrays in this piece.

His recent shows "Dead Meat" & "A whole lot of trouble for a little bit of win" gave us an insight in to the themes of empire and the cycles of power important to Conor.

Conor is particularly interested in the transition of the centre of power from the West to the East. Despite his paintings referencing the Baroque period they are very much concerned with our contemporary world. Paintings titled, "Who's World is this?", "When we were kings" and "For Want of a Kingdom, the Battle Was Lost" all reference Europe's economic and political decline in light of the rise of China.

In "The Unveiling", we can see familiar motifs of power the UN flag, a globe, a renaissance bust resting on the floor, the trophy dead pheasant and a table of cornucopia (with the nude female) being unveiled (offered) to the 'emperor' (seated).

Why are the symbols of empire placed on the floor? And symbols of excess / plenty commanding the attention of the protagonist? Is it a reference as to the moral state of our society in the west, that has allowed us to lose our grip on empire? Has decadence led to the fall of the West? 

The flag is vague and the globe is also indistinct, which further lends to my interpretation that the artist feels power is fading in plain sight, whilst the protagonist pays more attention to the 'offering'. 

I would be interested to see the complete body of work for the show, which I am sure would add clarity to interpreting this piece.

What do others think?  



  


 

Refreshing post. Thanks. I've only seen a tiny pic on my mobile. I'm waiting to have a look on a big screen. I'll be especially interested to do so after reading this.

[sgolby]

Very well articulated, and analyzed...

[Deleted]

Sept 15, 2014 20:44:56 GMT 1 anbesivam1 said:

Sept 15, 2014 19:54:37 GMT 1 Icesay said:

But what is the meaning of the picture? There seems to be a lot of elements to it or references perhaps....i like to know what is going on, that's what makes it clever or thought provoking...can anyone shed some light?

Great question. I don't have the answer, but only my interpretation.

I think, like any good art, there is room for the viewer to interpret this piece from his/her own perspective.

Having said this, an understanding of the context of Conor's previous bodies of work is important in order to appreciate the symbolism and messages Conor portrays in this piece.

His recent shows "Dead Meat" & "A whole lot of trouble for a little bit of win" gave us an insight in to the themes of empire and the cycles of power important to Conor.

Conor is particularly interested in the transition of the centre of power from the West to the East. Despite his paintings referencing the Baroque period they are very much concerned with our contemporary world. Paintings titled, "Who's World is this?", "When we were kings" and "For Want of a Kingdom, the Battle Was Lost" all reference Europe's economic and political decline in light of the rise of China.

In "The Unveiling", we can see familiar motifs of power the UN flag, a globe, a renaissance bust resting on the floor, the trophy dead pheasant and a table of cornucopia (with the nude female) being unveiled (offered) to the 'emperor' (seated).

Why are the symbols of empire placed on the floor? And symbols of excess / plenty commanding the attention of the protagonist? Is it a reference as to the moral state of our society in the west, that has allowed us to lose our grip on empire? Has decadence led to the fall of the West? 

The flag is vague and the globe is also indistinct, which further lends to my interpretation that the artist feels power is fading in plain sight, whilst the protagonist pays more attention to the 'offering'. 

I would be interested to see the complete body of work for the show, which I am sure would add clarity to interpreting this piece.

What do others think?  



  


 

Very refreshing to hear a thoughtful interpretation of art on here. Much better than the usually talk of money. Well done

[vytis33]

Sept 15, 2014 20:10:05 GMT 1 alittle said:

I wish this was the print release:

Absolutely...that's a fantastic piece right there.  Not crazy about the latest release to be honest. 

[thisisanton]

I might have to pass on this one. Was not approved by the wife. Why get it if it won't make the wall? (Unless you plan to flip it.) I was hoping for this as a print.

[Limited Prints]

SWEEET, going to be a lot easier to get one of these. nice and large. SWEEEEEET.

[joker3000]

And glossy. Don't forget glossy.

Looking forward to any pics of this when folks receive them.

[Jeezuz Jones Snr]

Sept 16, 2014 0:17:37 GMT 1 thisisanton said:

I might have to pass on this one. Was not approved by the wife. Why get it if it won't make the wall? (Unless you plan to flip it.) I was hoping for this as a print.

love this one Anton, would make a great release and would look great in my man cave. I wont be going for the release, been looking at it for a while but it doesn't jump out at me. Although I got loads of bills to pay this could be the first ever print i buy to flip will I make double the cost back?

[Deleted]

Sept 15, 2014 14:54:27 GMT 1 @federationofideas said:

Sept 15, 2014 14:47:48 GMT 1 alittle said:

To make it glossy? Applied by silkscreen?

I got that - but why does it need to be applied by silkscreen?  genuinely curious.   silkscreens are usually used to print using positive/negative space.

Normally to get a gloss finish on a digital print, youd print it on a gloss stock. Archival stocks for the most part are matte, and the silkscreen adds a nice finish on the image itself, leaving the outside edge and sig areas untouched to be signed and numbered by pencil. Thats my guess

[jayTown]

Sept 15, 2014 20:44:56 GMT 1 anbesivam1 said:

Sept 15, 2014 19:54:37 GMT 1 Icesay said:

But what is the meaning of the picture? There seems to be a lot of elements to it or references perhaps....i like to know what is going on, that's what makes it clever or thought provoking...can anyone shed some light?

Great question. I don't have the answer, but only my interpretation.

I think, like any good art, there is room for the viewer to interpret this piece from his/her own perspective.

Having said this, an understanding of the context of Conor's previous bodies of work is important in order to appreciate the symbolism and messages Conor portrays in this piece.

His recent shows "Dead Meat" & "A whole lot of trouble for a little bit of win" gave us an insight in to the themes of empire and the cycles of power important to Conor.

Conor is particularly interested in the transition of the centre of power from the West to the East. Despite his paintings referencing the Baroque period they are very much concerned with our contemporary world. Paintings titled, "Who's World is this?", "When we were kings" and "For Want of a Kingdom, the Battle Was Lost" all reference Europe's economic and political decline in light of the rise of China.

In "The Unveiling", we can see familiar motifs of power the UN flag, a globe, a renaissance bust resting on the floor, the trophy dead pheasant and a table of cornucopia (with the nude female) being unveiled (offered) to the 'emperor' (seated).

Why are the symbols of empire placed on the floor? And symbols of excess / plenty commanding the attention of the protagonist? Is it a reference as to the moral state of our society in the west, that has allowed us to lose our grip on empire? Has decadence led to the fall of the West? 

The flag is vague and the globe is also indistinct, which further lends to my interpretation that the artist feels power is fading in plain sight, whilst the protagonist pays more attention to the 'offering'. 

I would be interested to see the complete body of work for the show, which I am sure would add clarity to interpreting this piece.

What do others think?  



  


 

Really interesting post! I keep trying to work out what countries are left on the globe. Looks more like part of Africa?

[mutatis]

Sept 15, 2014 20:44:56 GMT 1 anbesivam1 said:

Sept 15, 2014 19:54:37 GMT 1 Icesay said:

But what is the meaning of the picture? There seems to be a lot of elements to it or references perhaps....i like to know what is going on, that's what makes it clever or thought provoking...can anyone shed some light?

Great question. I don't have the answer, but only my interpretation.

I think, like any good art, there is room for the viewer to interpret this piece from his/her own perspective.

Having said this, an understanding of the context of Conor's previous bodies of work is important in order to appreciate the symbolism and messages Conor portrays in this piece.

His recent shows "Dead Meat" & "A whole lot of trouble for a little bit of win" gave us an insight in to the themes of empire and the cycles of power important to Conor.

Conor is particularly interested in the transition of the centre of power from the West to the East. Despite his paintings referencing the Baroque period they are very much concerned with our contemporary world. Paintings titled, "Who's World is this?", "When we were kings" and "For Want of a Kingdom, the Battle Was Lost" all reference Europe's economic and political decline in light of the rise of China.

In "The Unveiling", we can see familiar motifs of power the UN flag, a globe, a renaissance bust resting on the floor, the trophy dead pheasant and a table of cornucopia (with the nude female) being unveiled (offered) to the 'emperor' (seated).

Why are the symbols of empire placed on the floor? And symbols of excess / plenty commanding the attention of the protagonist? Is it a reference as to the moral state of our society in the west, that has allowed us to lose our grip on empire? Has decadence led to the fall of the West? 

The flag is vague and the globe is also indistinct, which further lends to my interpretation that the artist feels power is fading in plain sight, whilst the protagonist pays more attention to the 'offering'. 

I would be interested to see the complete body of work for the show, which I am sure would add clarity to interpreting this piece.

What do others think?  



  


 

Very interesting observations anbesivam1 and thank you for sharing – indeed these themes have indeed been consistently employed by Conor in the last couple of years. I’d only add that my guess is that in keeping with Conor’s previous work where naked flesh is literally "served up" and adds to the cornucopia and the idea of excess and abundance, that this is a comment on a sex (porn perhaps?) obsessed society and as a result of that I think the bust on the floor here could equally be Caligula as well as Nero (see the film below at 55.00 where Conor references Nero in Dead Meat).

For those of you that have not seen it – and I have only just come across it - here is a film of Conor from around the time of the Dead Meat show explaining his work up to that point. It’s all relevant and really revealing, but for those that are looking for clues for the meaning behind “The Unveiling” watch from around the 52.12 mark.

[winston]

Hmm love his stuff but I'm a little disappointed with this? Expected some hand finishing...

Wanted to be blown away but I'm not

[aibohphobia]

Any idea what shipping to the US will be? Last time I tried to order a "large" print it was like 75 bucks.

[mrkyuss]

Weak print compared to his last few.

[alittle]

Sept 16, 2014 9:52:01 GMT 1 aibohphobia said:

Any idea what shipping to the US will be? Last time I tried to order a "large" print it was like 75 bucks.

I would expect the same.