Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on Oct 26, 2018 16:15:10 GMT 1, I've never really understood why Banksy gets all hot under the collar over so-called 'fake' exhibitions. What's the difference? Does he get paid for the 'real' exhibitions? Probably more concerned that people are paying high prices to see something that they think is official, and he'd rather his public shows were free or very cheap.
I've never really understood why Banksy gets all hot under the collar over so-called 'fake' exhibitions. What's the difference? Does he get paid for the 'real' exhibitions? Probably more concerned that people are paying high prices to see something that they think is official, and he'd rather his public shows were free or very cheap. That's fair enough if he wants his exhibitions to be free. But I don't see why that makes the paid ones "fake". |
|
Pysgod
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,677
👍🏻 1,347
December 2016
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Pysgod on Oct 26, 2018 16:17:37 GMT 1, Probably more concerned that people are paying high prices to see something that they think is official, and he'd rather his public shows were free or very cheap. That's fair enough if he wants his exhibitions to be free. But I don't see why that makes the paid ones "fake".
Probably more concerned that people are paying high prices to see something that they think is official, and he'd rather his public shows were free or very cheap. That's fair enough if he wants his exhibitions to be free. But I don't see why that makes the paid ones "fake". Would you like to see people making money off your back using your name ? |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on Oct 26, 2018 16:17:59 GMT 1, You can go into the hotel and peruse all of the works in public area for free but better to have a beer or two at the same time.
Probably cost you a few quid to get there but its still free to go in.
You can go into the hotel and peruse all of the works in public area for free but better to have a beer or two at the same time.
Probably cost you a few quid to get there but its still free to go in.
|
|
|
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Happy Shopper on Oct 26, 2018 16:19:12 GMT 1, Probably more concerned that people are paying high prices to see something that they think is official, and he'd rather his public shows were free or very cheap. That's fair enough if he wants his exhibitions to be free. But I don't see why that makes the paid ones "fake".
Unofficial, nothing to do with him, so fake "Banksy Shows"
Probably more concerned that people are paying high prices to see something that they think is official, and he'd rather his public shows were free or very cheap. That's fair enough if he wants his exhibitions to be free. But I don't see why that makes the paid ones "fake". Unofficial, nothing to do with him, so fake "Banksy Shows" |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on Oct 26, 2018 16:21:48 GMT 1, I've never really understood why Banksy gets all hot under the collar over so-called 'fake' exhibitions. What's the difference? Does he get paid for the 'real' exhibitions? He surely won't get paid for the fake ones. An exhibition usually has a theme. And pieces that belong within that theme. The fake are just pieces put together to be monetized. And some are organized by Laz, which I believe was not a happy break up. (Correct me if I'm wrong there)
I've never really understood why Banksy gets all hot under the collar over so-called 'fake' exhibitions. What's the difference? Does he get paid for the 'real' exhibitions? He surely won't get paid for the fake ones. An exhibition usually has a theme. And pieces that belong within that theme. The fake are just pieces put together to be monetized. And some are organized by Laz, which I believe was not a happy break up. (Correct me if I'm wrong there) Regarding the point about getting paid for exhibitions, is it usual practice for the artist to get paid when a major gallery puts on a solo show of the artist's work? They would, of course, get paid if artworks are for sale but most gallery exhibitions are not selling the artist's work; just displaying it. |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on Oct 26, 2018 16:25:33 GMT 1, That's fair enough if he wants his exhibitions to be free. But I don't see why that makes the paid ones "fake". Would you like to see people making money off your back using your name ?
That's fair enough if he wants his exhibitions to be free. But I don't see why that makes the paid ones "fake". Would you like to see people making money off your back using your name ? You mean the $10 entrance fee? And then there's all the overheads like lighting and heating, security, admin staff etc. etc. I bet some exhibitions only just break even. |
|
|
|
kaos
New Member
🗨️ 505
👍🏻 627
June 2015
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by kaos on Oct 26, 2018 16:27:15 GMT 1, It's called intellectual property rights or copyright.
He is a living artist and any exhibition that exhibits his work must obtain a license/consent from Banksy. But because who he is i.e. he doesn't follow up on the image rights and people know that so these unscrupulous twats are making money on his name. That would not happen with any other artist.
It's called intellectual property rights or copyright.
He is a living artist and any exhibition that exhibits his work must obtain a license/consent from Banksy. But because who he is i.e. he doesn't follow up on the image rights and people know that so these unscrupulous twats are making money on his name. That would not happen with any other artist.
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on Oct 26, 2018 16:27:27 GMT 1, That's fair enough if he wants his exhibitions to be free. But I don't see why that makes the paid ones "fake". Unofficial, nothing to do with him, so fake "Banksy Shows"
That's fair enough if he wants his exhibitions to be free. But I don't see why that makes the paid ones "fake". Unofficial, nothing to do with him, so fake "Banksy Shows" The recent Picasso show at Tate Modern had nothing to do with Pablo Picasso. Does that make it 'fake'? |
|
Pysgod
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,677
👍🏻 1,347
December 2016
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Pysgod on Oct 26, 2018 16:29:00 GMT 1, Would you like to see people making money off your back using your name ? You mean the $10 entrance fee? And then there's all the overheads like lighting and heating, security, admin staff etc. etc. I bet some exhibitions only just break even.
Would you like to see people making money off your back using your name ? You mean the $10 entrance fee? And then there's all the overheads like lighting and heating, security, admin staff etc. etc. I bet some exhibitions only just break even. I thinks its a bit more @£15-20 what about the unofficial merchandise they sell ? |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on Oct 26, 2018 16:32:14 GMT 1, You mean the $10 entrance fee? And then there's all the overheads like lighting and heating, security, admin staff etc. etc. I bet some exhibitions only just break even. I thinks its a bit more @£15-20 what about the unofficial merchandise they sell ?
You mean the $10 entrance fee? And then there's all the overheads like lighting and heating, security, admin staff etc. etc. I bet some exhibitions only just break even. I thinks its a bit more @£15-20 what about the unofficial merchandise they sell ? Selling unofficial merchandise is obviously breaking copyright laws. That's rather a different argument to that of 'fake exhibitions'. Fake exhibitions are not displaying fake Banksys. |
|
|
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Happy Shopper on Oct 26, 2018 16:32:36 GMT 1, Unofficial, nothing to do with him, so fake "Banksy Shows" The recent Picasso show at Tate Modern had nothing to do with Pablo Picasso. Does that make it 'fake'?
You don't need permission, obviously, but as Banksy is still alive he's able to voice an opinion.
But, Tate probably had permission from the estate of Picasso... as they probably sold official merchandise too.
Unofficial, nothing to do with him, so fake "Banksy Shows" The recent Picasso show at Tate Modern had nothing to do with Pablo Picasso. Does that make it 'fake'? You don't need permission, obviously, but as Banksy is still alive he's able to voice an opinion. But, Tate probably had permission from the estate of Picasso... as they probably sold official merchandise too. |
|
Pysgod
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,677
👍🏻 1,347
December 2016
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Pysgod on Oct 26, 2018 16:35:20 GMT 1, I thinks its a bit more @£15-20 what about the unofficial merchandise they sell ? Selling unofficial merchandise is obviously breaking copyright laws. That's rather a different argument to that of 'fake exhibitions'. Fake exhibitions are not displaying fake Banksys.
you got a lot to learn 
I thinks its a bit more @£15-20 what about the unofficial merchandise they sell ? Selling unofficial merchandise is obviously breaking copyright laws. That's rather a different argument to that of 'fake exhibitions'. Fake exhibitions are not displaying fake Banksys. you got a lot to learn |
|
kaos
New Member
🗨️ 505
👍🏻 627
June 2015
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by kaos on Oct 26, 2018 16:36:07 GMT 1, Unofficial, nothing to do with him, so fake "Banksy Shows" The recent Picasso show at Tate Modern had nothing to do with Pablo Picasso. Does that make it 'fake'?
Unofficial, nothing to do with him, so fake "Banksy Shows" The recent Picasso show at Tate Modern had nothing to do with Pablo Picasso. Does that make it 'fake'? I'd imagine a gallery like The Tate Modern would not put on a show without consent from Picasso's estate. If only as a courtesy/respect to the artist and his estate. |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on Oct 26, 2018 16:43:05 GMT 1, Unofficial, nothing to do with him, so fake "Banksy Shows" The recent Picasso show at Tate Modern had nothing to do with Pablo Picasso. Does that make it 'fake'?
I think you’ll find that it had a lot to do with Pablo Picasso; Tate would not put a show of this nature on without agreement of those who look after his estate.
Unofficial, nothing to do with him, so fake "Banksy Shows" The recent Picasso show at Tate Modern had nothing to do with Pablo Picasso. Does that make it 'fake'? I think you’ll find that it had a lot to do with Pablo Picasso; Tate would not put a show of this nature on without agreement of those who look after his estate. |
|
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on Oct 26, 2018 16:59:54 GMT 1, I am sure Tate Modern informed the estate of Picasso that they were putting on a show; just out of courtesy. But if they got all the paintings from art museums and galleries around the world and from private owners then why do they need permission from the estate of Picasso? Indeed, do they need permission?
I am sure Tate Modern informed the estate of Picasso that they were putting on a show; just out of courtesy. But if they got all the paintings from art museums and galleries around the world and from private owners then why do they need permission from the estate of Picasso? Indeed, do they need permission?
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on Oct 26, 2018 17:03:15 GMT 1, I am sure Tate Modern informed the estate of Picasso that they were putting on a show; just out of courtesy. But if they got all the paintings from art museums and galleries around the world and from private owners then why do they need permission from the estate of Picasso? Indeed, do they need permission?
is your other name Murkke03?
I am sure Tate Modern informed the estate of Picasso that they were putting on a show; just out of courtesy. But if they got all the paintings from art museums and galleries around the world and from private owners then why do they need permission from the estate of Picasso? Indeed, do they need permission? is your other name Murkke03? |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on Oct 26, 2018 17:50:20 GMT 1, I am sure Tate Modern informed the estate of Picasso that they were putting on a show; just out of courtesy. But if they got all the paintings from art museums and galleries around the world and from private owners then why do they need permission from the estate of Picasso? Indeed, do they need permission?
No, i don't think private collectors of any artists would need permission.
I think we have 2 things here
Exhibitions that show an artist and there is no selling involved
And exhibitions which are put on with the main aim being to sell things.
So effectively a gallery, in the case of the russian show it being organised by CAT galleries, AKA contemporary art traders, AKA Lilleys fine art Ltd
Here you have a show in Russia, check out the link
banksyexhibition.com/
have a quick read up, imagine your not an expert like we all are. Whose show does it look like? Who has set it up?
but when you look further it was from the guys above
as a side note
does anyone know how it ended with the Invaders? Was it a happy ending?
urbanartassociation.com/thread/147352/invader-prisoners-unsigned-1250?page=10
I am sure Tate Modern informed the estate of Picasso that they were putting on a show; just out of courtesy. But if they got all the paintings from art museums and galleries around the world and from private owners then why do they need permission from the estate of Picasso? Indeed, do they need permission? No, i don't think private collectors of any artists would need permission. I think we have 2 things here Exhibitions that show an artist and there is no selling involved And exhibitions which are put on with the main aim being to sell things. So effectively a gallery, in the case of the russian show it being organised by CAT galleries, AKA contemporary art traders, AKA Lilleys fine art Ltd Here you have a show in Russia, check out the link banksyexhibition.com/have a quick read up, imagine your not an expert like we all are. Whose show does it look like? Who has set it up? but when you look further it was from the guys above as a side note does anyone know how it ended with the Invaders? Was it a happy ending? urbanartassociation.com/thread/147352/invader-prisoners-unsigned-1250?page=10 |
|
|
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Lroy on Oct 26, 2018 18:09:42 GMT 1, Unofficial, nothing to do with him, so fake "Banksy Shows" The recent Picasso show at Tate Modern had nothing to do with Pablo Picasso. Does that make it 'fake'?
Yes you are right, as Van Gogh biggest exhibition in Amsterdam in the 90, as exhibition at this moment about Balthus in Bâle. They are not fake at all and were/are more expensive ( at Le Grand Palais per example ) than the « fake « Banksy ones named here ( not so much expensive too ).
Maybe Banksy Should call the real exhibition, « My « shows, and the other ones Exhibitions about me where I’m not involved.
Copyright is fir books and music no ? Or reproductions ?
It’s true that a lot of the fake exhibitions have been made with some catalogues or goodies to buy and Banksy did not earn a penny.
It seems that LazvsBanksy is not finished at all and I already thought to Laz.
Anyway, As said, the prices of tthe entrance of these « fakes « are not so high.
But the real and great shows, incomparable, are without context Banksy shows !! Top and classy ones !
For the WOH, even if you say « it’s free «
, it is not.
We have to go to Palestine, it means, to pay a plane, hôtels etc..
I cannot afford that at all.
So - for me - it is very expensive even if it’s « free « .
Don’t play with the words I think. Even if, ok, it’s free !
But...
Next show in France ?
Unofficial, nothing to do with him, so fake "Banksy Shows" The recent Picasso show at Tate Modern had nothing to do with Pablo Picasso. Does that make it 'fake'? Yes you are right, as Van Gogh biggest exhibition in Amsterdam in the 90, as exhibition at this moment about Balthus in Bâle. They are not fake at all and were/are more expensive ( at Le Grand Palais per example ) than the « fake « Banksy ones named here ( not so much expensive too ). Maybe Banksy Should call the real exhibition, « My « shows, and the other ones Exhibitions about me where I’m not involved. Copyright is fir books and music no ? Or reproductions ? It’s true that a lot of the fake exhibitions have been made with some catalogues or goodies to buy and Banksy did not earn a penny. It seems that LazvsBanksy is not finished at all and I already thought to Laz. Anyway, As said, the prices of tthe entrance of these « fakes « are not so high. But the real and great shows, incomparable, are without context Banksy shows !! Top and classy ones ! For the WOH, even if you say « it’s free « , it is not. We have to go to Palestine, it means, to pay a plane, hôtels etc.. I cannot afford that at all. So - for me - it is very expensive even if it’s « free « . Don’t play with the words I think. Even if, ok, it’s free ! But... Next show in France ? |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on Oct 26, 2018 18:28:35 GMT 1, I am sure Tate Modern informed the estate of Picasso that they were putting on a show; just out of courtesy. But if they got all the paintings from art museums and galleries around the world and from private owners then why do they need permission from the estate of Picasso? Indeed, do they need permission? is your other name Murkke03?
The reason for all my posts on this thread is simply because I find the subject quite interesting, however strange that may seem.
I don't actually care if Banksy gets pissed off with fake exhibitions or not. But I am quite interested in whether art galleries need "permission" to present a solo exhibition of an artist's work, whether that is Banksy, Picasso, Tracey Emin, or Paul Cezanne.
I am sure Tate Modern informed the estate of Picasso that they were putting on a show; just out of courtesy. But if they got all the paintings from art museums and galleries around the world and from private owners then why do they need permission from the estate of Picasso? Indeed, do they need permission? is your other name Murkke03? Never heard of him/her/it. Are they a contributor to these forums? I just had a look at the members list on here and couldn't find that particular name. The reason for all my posts on this thread is simply because I find the subject quite interesting, however strange that may seem. I don't actually care if Banksy gets pissed off with fake exhibitions or not. But I am quite interested in whether art galleries need "permission" to present a solo exhibition of an artist's work, whether that is Banksy, Picasso, Tracey Emin, or Paul Cezanne. |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on Oct 26, 2018 18:32:31 GMT 1, is your other name Murkke03? Never heard of him/her/it. Are they a contributor to these forums? I just had a look at the members list on here and couldn't find that particular name. The reason for all my posts on this thread is simply because I find the subject quite interesting, however strange that may seem. I don't actually care if Banksy gets pissed off with fake exhibitions or not. But I am quite interested in whether art galleries need "permission" to present a solo exhibition of an artist's work, whether that is Banksy, Picasso, Tracey Emin, or Paul Cezanne.
I was only pullin your puddin a tad, your line of question reminds me of RouenCathedral’s formerly known as Murrke.
is your other name Murkke03? Never heard of him/her/it. Are they a contributor to these forums? I just had a look at the members list on here and couldn't find that particular name. The reason for all my posts on this thread is simply because I find the subject quite interesting, however strange that may seem. I don't actually care if Banksy gets pissed off with fake exhibitions or not. But I am quite interested in whether art galleries need "permission" to present a solo exhibition of an artist's work, whether that is Banksy, Picasso, Tracey Emin, or Paul Cezanne. I was only pullin your puddin a tad, your line of question reminds me of RouenCathedral’s formerly known as Murrke. |
|
|
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Lroy on Oct 26, 2018 21:53:38 GMT 1, This is simply a moral choice, the artist who created the works has made his thoughts on these "fake exhibitions" crystal clear. There's no argument for the people involved having the artists interests at heart, this is self interest solely, there's no argument for it promoting the artist, he's more than capable of doing that 100 fold. The people visiting could argue they just want to see Banksys, but at what cost, if you were standing in front of the artist and he expressed he was unhappy would you still go? Like everything in life it's about choice, the artist spelt that out in his statement.
great analysis. Deep, quiet and smart. Thank you.
This is simply a moral choice, the artist who created the works has made his thoughts on these "fake exhibitions" crystal clear. There's no argument for the people involved having the artists interests at heart, this is self interest solely, there's no argument for it promoting the artist, he's more than capable of doing that 100 fold. The people visiting could argue they just want to see Banksys, but at what cost, if you were standing in front of the artist and he expressed he was unhappy would you still go? Like everything in life it's about choice, the artist spelt that out in his statement. great analysis. Deep, quiet and smart. Thank you. |
|
|
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Not 4 The Thril on Oct 26, 2018 21:58:43 GMT 1, i would say his last real art show was his 30 day NYC residency.
He showed a ton of new art for free on his own terms.
i would say his last real art show was his 30 day NYC residency.
He showed a ton of new art for free on his own terms.
|
|
|
|
iamzero
Full Member
🗨️ 9,190
👍🏻 8,545
May 2011
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by iamzero on Oct 27, 2018 8:16:23 GMT 1, I am sure Tate Modern informed the estate of Picasso that they were putting on a show; just out of courtesy. But if they got all the paintings from art museums and galleries around the world and from private owners then why do they need permission from the estate of Picasso? Indeed, do they need permission? No, i don't think private collectors of any artists would need permission. I think we have 2 things here Exhibitions that show an artist and there is no selling involved And exhibitions which are put on with the main aim being to sell things. So effectively a gallery, in the case of the russian show it being organised by CAT galleries, AKA contemporary art traders, AKA Lilleys fine art Ltd Here you have a show in Russia, check out the link banksyexhibition.com/have a quick read up, imagine your not an expert like we all are. Whose show does it look like? Who has set it up? but when you look further it was from the guys above as a side note does anyone know how it ended with the Invaders? Was it a happy ending? urbanartassociation.com/thread/147352/invader-prisoners-unsigned-1250?page=10
He bullied the person that owned all of the prints into refunding all the stuff he’d sold at a profit. Very shady.
I am sure Tate Modern informed the estate of Picasso that they were putting on a show; just out of courtesy. But if they got all the paintings from art museums and galleries around the world and from private owners then why do they need permission from the estate of Picasso? Indeed, do they need permission? No, i don't think private collectors of any artists would need permission. I think we have 2 things here Exhibitions that show an artist and there is no selling involved And exhibitions which are put on with the main aim being to sell things. So effectively a gallery, in the case of the russian show it being organised by CAT galleries, AKA contemporary art traders, AKA Lilleys fine art Ltd Here you have a show in Russia, check out the link banksyexhibition.com/have a quick read up, imagine your not an expert like we all are. Whose show does it look like? Who has set it up? but when you look further it was from the guys above as a side note does anyone know how it ended with the Invaders? Was it a happy ending? urbanartassociation.com/thread/147352/invader-prisoners-unsigned-1250?page=10He bullied the person that owned all of the prints into refunding all the stuff he’d sold at a profit. Very shady. |
|
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on Oct 27, 2018 12:25:57 GMT 1, No, i don't think private collectors of any artists would need permission. I think we have 2 things here Exhibitions that show an artist and there is no selling involved And exhibitions which are put on with the main aim being to sell things. So effectively a gallery, in the case of the russian show it being organised by CAT galleries, AKA contemporary art traders, AKA Lilleys fine art Ltd Here you have a show in Russia, check out the link banksyexhibition.com/have a quick read up, imagine your not an expert like we all are. Whose show does it look like? Who has set it up? but when you look further it was from the guys above as a side note does anyone know how it ended with the Invaders? Was it a happy ending? urbanartassociation.com/thread/147352/invader-prisoners-unsigned-1250?page=10He bullied the person that owned all of the prints into refunding all the stuff he’d sold at a profit. Very shady.
Sorry, I dont understand
No, i don't think private collectors of any artists would need permission. I think we have 2 things here Exhibitions that show an artist and there is no selling involved And exhibitions which are put on with the main aim being to sell things. So effectively a gallery, in the case of the russian show it being organised by CAT galleries, AKA contemporary art traders, AKA Lilleys fine art Ltd Here you have a show in Russia, check out the link banksyexhibition.com/have a quick read up, imagine your not an expert like we all are. Whose show does it look like? Who has set it up? but when you look further it was from the guys above as a side note does anyone know how it ended with the Invaders? Was it a happy ending? urbanartassociation.com/thread/147352/invader-prisoners-unsigned-1250?page=10He bullied the person that owned all of the prints into refunding all the stuff he’d sold at a profit. Very shady. ? Sorry, I dont understand |
|
|
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Rouen Cathedral on Oct 27, 2018 12:52:26 GMT 1, So let's get this straight.
He's okay having his work sell in the biggest auction houses in the world.
But can't take it when a museum holds a show of real banksy work and charges for it.
LOL
So let's get this straight.
He's okay having his work sell in the biggest auction houses in the world.
But can't take it when a museum holds a show of real banksy work and charges for it.
LOL
|
|
|
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Rouen Cathedral on Oct 27, 2018 12:55:57 GMT 1, Never heard of him/her/it. Are they a contributor to these forums? I just had a look at the members list on here and couldn't find that particular name. The reason for all my posts on this thread is simply because I find the subject quite interesting, however strange that may seem. I don't actually care if Banksy gets pissed off with fake exhibitions or not. But I am quite interested in whether art galleries need "permission" to present a solo exhibition of an artist's work, whether that is Banksy, Picasso, Tracey Emin, or Paul Cezanne. I was only pullin your puddin a tad, your line of question reminds me of RouenCathedral’s formerly known as Murrke.
Line of questioning aka gaining facts is a no no here!
Never heard of him/her/it. Are they a contributor to these forums? I just had a look at the members list on here and couldn't find that particular name. The reason for all my posts on this thread is simply because I find the subject quite interesting, however strange that may seem. I don't actually care if Banksy gets pissed off with fake exhibitions or not. But I am quite interested in whether art galleries need "permission" to present a solo exhibition of an artist's work, whether that is Banksy, Picasso, Tracey Emin, or Paul Cezanne. I was only pullin your puddin a tad, your line of question reminds me of RouenCathedral’s formerly known as Murrke. Line of questioning aka gaining facts is a no no here! |
|
|
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Rouen Cathedral on Oct 27, 2018 12:57:30 GMT 1, i would say his last real art show was his 30 day NYC residency. He showed a ton of new art for free on his own terms.
Best thing banksy ever did in my opinion.
i would say his last real art show was his 30 day NYC residency. He showed a ton of new art for free on his own terms. Best thing banksy ever did in my opinion. |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Deleted on Oct 27, 2018 13:10:37 GMT 1, I was only pullin your puddin a tad, your line of question reminds me of RouenCathedral’s formerly known as Murrke. Line of questioning aka gaining facts is a no no here!
One fact is that u can b a royal pain in the arse with your incessant inane questioning.
I was only pullin your puddin a tad, your line of question reminds me of RouenCathedral’s formerly known as Murrke. Line of questioning aka gaining facts is a no no here! One fact is that u can b a royal pain in the arse with your incessant inane questioning. |
|
|
|
Banksy.co.uk • Official Banksy Website , by Rouen Cathedral on Oct 27, 2018 13:12:16 GMT 1, Line of questioning aka gaining facts is a no no here! One fact is that u can b a royal pain in the arse with your incessant inane questioning.
Well I apologize if.my questions bring you pain. No intention of that.
Anyway didn't LAZ throw an unauthorizes banksy exhibit? Is that on the list?
Line of questioning aka gaining facts is a no no here! One fact is that u can b a royal pain in the arse with your incessant inane questioning. Well I apologize if.my questions bring you pain. No intention of that. Anyway didn't LAZ throw an unauthorizes banksy exhibit? Is that on the list? |
|
