Deleted
Posts โข 0
Likes โข
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on May 26, 2019 17:45:25 GMT 1, I'm Dutch, I can't vote for Trump. #missedthememo? but you support him? different context but the same gig. I have stated time and time again that if I'd be living in the US, I probably wouldn't even vote based on the two party system where you have to choose between insane lefties and religious gun nuts.
I'm Dutch, I can't vote for Trump. #missedthememo? but you support him? different context but the same gig. I have stated time and time again that if I'd be living in the US, I probably wouldn't even vote based on the two party system where you have to choose between insane lefties and religious gun nuts.
|
|
Deleted
Posts โข 0
Likes โข
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on May 26, 2019 17:46:17 GMT 1, I'm Dutch, I can't vote for Trump. #missedthememo? So I guess you vote for the Party of the Animals thenโฆ.. I do support the Party Animals, does that count?
I'm Dutch, I can't vote for Trump. #missedthememo? So I guess you vote for the Party of the Animals thenโฆ.. I do support the Party Animals, does that count?
|
|
.dappy
Full Member
Posts โข 9,835
Likes โข 9,443
December 2010
|
Donald Trump, by .dappy on May 29, 2019 21:48:32 GMT 1,
|
|
Jaylove
Junior Member
Posts โข 1,596
Likes โข 1,073
November 2016
|
Donald Trump, by Jaylove on May 30, 2019 0:48:00 GMT 1, Trump supporters still running in the streets screaming his innocence.
Trump supporters still running in the streets screaming his innocence.
|
|
Deleted
Posts โข 0
Likes โข
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on May 30, 2019 10:19:33 GMT 1, I'm slightly confused here. He says that a sitting president can't be indicted. So, if I am reading this correctly, no one can touch Trump regardless of how much evidence may pile up against him. In other words, what's the point, even if he is guilty as hell?
I'm slightly confused here. He says that a sitting president can't be indicted. So, if I am reading this correctly, no one can touch Trump regardless of how much evidence may pile up against him. In other words, what's the point, even if he is guilty as hell?
|
|
|
Donald Trump, by Coach on May 30, 2019 10:36:45 GMT 1, I'm slightly confused here. ย He says that a sitting president can't be indicted. ย So, if I am reading this correctly, no one can touch Trump regardless of how much evidence may pile up against him. ย In other words, what's the point, even if he is guilty as hell?
I donโt profess to know much about the workings of US politics. But isnโt it the case that, in principle, he could be impeached rather than indicted?
I'm slightly confused here. ย He says that a sitting president can't be indicted. ย So, if I am reading this correctly, no one can touch Trump regardless of how much evidence may pile up against him. ย In other words, what's the point, even if he is guilty as hell? I donโt profess to know much about the workings of US politics. But isnโt it the case that, in principle, he could be impeached rather than indicted?
|
|
|
Deleted
Posts โข 0
Likes โข
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on May 30, 2019 10:52:21 GMT 1, I'm slightly confused here. He says that a sitting president can't be indicted. So, if I am reading this correctly, no one can touch Trump regardless of how much evidence may pile up against him. In other words, what's the point, even if he is guilty as hell? I donโt profess to know much about the workings of US politics. But isnโt it the case that, in principle, he could be impeached rather than indicted? I'm also somewhat ignorant on the workings of US policies but impeachment, as far as I know, does not remove a president from office or send him to jail. It simply means it goes to a vote amongst the House of Representatives and with a Republican majority I think we all know what the outcome of that will be.
I'm slightly confused here. He says that a sitting president can't be indicted. So, if I am reading this correctly, no one can touch Trump regardless of how much evidence may pile up against him. In other words, what's the point, even if he is guilty as hell? I donโt profess to know much about the workings of US politics. But isnโt it the case that, in principle, he could be impeached rather than indicted? I'm also somewhat ignorant on the workings of US policies but impeachment, as far as I know, does not remove a president from office or send him to jail. It simply means it goes to a vote amongst the House of Representatives and with a Republican majority I think we all know what the outcome of that will be.
|
|
Bill Hicks
New Member
Posts โข 932
Likes โข 1,133
May 2008
|
Donald Trump, by Bill Hicks on May 30, 2019 11:07:29 GMT 1, I donโt profess to know much about the workings of US politics. But isnโt it the case that, in principle, he could be impeached rather than indicted? I'm also somewhat ignorant on the workings of US policies but impeachment, as far as I know, does not remove a president from office or send him to jail. It simply means it goes to a vote amongst the House of Representatives and with a Republican majority I think we all know what the outcome of that will be. The term โimpeachmentโ itself dates back centuries in England, where it was โa device for prosecuting great lords and high officials who were beyond the reach of the law courts,โ But in the US context, the framers of the Constitution set up the impeachment process to be a way Congress can remove the president from power. First, the House of Representatives has the power to impeach the president. A simple majority is necessary for an article of impeachment to be approved (each article lays out a charge against the president). Then the process moves to the Senate, where a trial will be held, with the chief justice of the Supreme Court presiding. Finally, and crucially, it takes a two-thirds vote from the Senate to actually convict a president on any count. Conviction on any count would then remove the president from office and put the vice president in power.
I donโt profess to know much about the workings of US politics. But isnโt it the case that, in principle, he could be impeached rather than indicted? I'm also somewhat ignorant on the workings of US policies but impeachment, as far as I know, does not remove a president from office or send him to jail. It simply means it goes to a vote amongst the House of Representatives and with a Republican majority I think we all know what the outcome of that will be. The term โimpeachmentโ itself dates back centuries in England, where it was โa device for prosecuting great lords and high officials who were beyond the reach of the law courts,โ But in the US context, the framers of the Constitution set up the impeachment process to be a way Congress can remove the president from power. First, the House of Representatives has the power to impeach the president. A simple majority is necessary for an article of impeachment to be approved (each article lays out a charge against the president). Then the process moves to the Senate, where a trial will be held, with the chief justice of the Supreme Court presiding. Finally, and crucially, it takes a two-thirds vote from the Senate to actually convict a president on any count. Conviction on any count would then remove the president from office and put the vice president in power.
|
|
Bill Hicks
New Member
Posts โข 932
Likes โข 1,133
May 2008
|
Donald Trump, by Bill Hicks on May 30, 2019 11:09:34 GMT 1, England. Impeachment is when a peer or commoner is accused of โhigh crimes and misdemeanours, beyond the reach of the law or which no other authority in the state will prosecute.โ It is a procedure that is โdirected in particular against Ministers of the Crownโ. The first recorded impeachment was in 1376 and the last in 1806. This procedure is considered obsolete.
England. Impeachment is when a peer or commoner is accused of โhigh crimes and misdemeanours, beyond the reach of the law or which no other authority in the state will prosecute.โ It is a procedure that is โdirected in particular against Ministers of the Crownโ. The first recorded impeachment was in 1376 and the last in 1806. This procedure is considered obsolete.
|
|
Deleted
Posts โข 0
Likes โข
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on May 30, 2019 11:19:44 GMT 1, I'm also somewhat ignorant on the workings of US policies but impeachment, as far as I know, does not remove a president from office or send him to jail. It simply means it goes to a vote amongst the House of Representatives and with a Republican majority I think we all know what the outcome of that will be. The term โimpeachmentโ itself dates back centuries in England, where it was โa device for prosecuting great lords and high officials who were beyond the reach of the law courts,โ But in the US context, the framers of the Constitution set up the impeachment process to be a way Congress can remove the president from power. First, the House of Representatives has the power to impeach the president. A simple majority is necessary for an article of impeachment to be approved (each article lays out a charge against the president). Then the process moves to the Senate, where a trial will be held, with the chief justice of the Supreme Court presiding. Finally, and crucially, it takes a two-thirds vote from the Senate to actually convict a president on any count. Conviction on any count would then remove the president from office and put the vice president in power. Thanks for that. That's interesting. But my point still stands, doesn't it? The House of Representatives is majority Republican, isn't it? Therefore, impeachment will never happen (unless a large number of Republicans go rogue, of course).
I'm also somewhat ignorant on the workings of US policies but impeachment, as far as I know, does not remove a president from office or send him to jail. It simply means it goes to a vote amongst the House of Representatives and with a Republican majority I think we all know what the outcome of that will be. The term โimpeachmentโ itself dates back centuries in England, where it was โa device for prosecuting great lords and high officials who were beyond the reach of the law courts,โ But in the US context, the framers of the Constitution set up the impeachment process to be a way Congress can remove the president from power. First, the House of Representatives has the power to impeach the president. A simple majority is necessary for an article of impeachment to be approved (each article lays out a charge against the president). Then the process moves to the Senate, where a trial will be held, with the chief justice of the Supreme Court presiding. Finally, and crucially, it takes a two-thirds vote from the Senate to actually convict a president on any count. Conviction on any count would then remove the president from office and put the vice president in power. Thanks for that. That's interesting. But my point still stands, doesn't it? The House of Representatives is majority Republican, isn't it? Therefore, impeachment will never happen (unless a large number of Republicans go rogue, of course).
|
|
|
Donald Trump, by ๐ ๐ ๐ on May 30, 2019 12:04:00 GMT 1, The term โimpeachmentโ itself dates back centuries in England, where it was โa device for prosecuting great lords and high officials who were beyond the reach of the law courts,โ But in the US context, the framers of the Constitution set up the impeachment process to be a way Congress can remove the president from power. First, the House of Representatives has the power to impeach the president. A simple majority is necessary for an article of impeachment to be approved (each article lays out a charge against the president). Then the process moves to the Senate, where a trial will be held, with the chief justice of the Supreme Court presiding. Finally, and crucially, it takes a two-thirds vote from the Senate to actually convict a president on any count. Conviction on any count would then remove the president from office and put the vice president in power. Thanks for that. ย That's interesting. ย But my point still stands, doesn't it? ย The House of Representatives is majority Republican, isn't it? ย Therefore, impeachment will never happen (unless a large number of Republicans go rogue, of course). ย The Democrats have the majority in the house, but not the Senate.
The term โimpeachmentโ itself dates back centuries in England, where it was โa device for prosecuting great lords and high officials who were beyond the reach of the law courts,โ But in the US context, the framers of the Constitution set up the impeachment process to be a way Congress can remove the president from power. First, the House of Representatives has the power to impeach the president. A simple majority is necessary for an article of impeachment to be approved (each article lays out a charge against the president). Then the process moves to the Senate, where a trial will be held, with the chief justice of the Supreme Court presiding. Finally, and crucially, it takes a two-thirds vote from the Senate to actually convict a president on any count. Conviction on any count would then remove the president from office and put the vice president in power. Thanks for that. ย That's interesting. ย But my point still stands, doesn't it? ย The House of Representatives is majority Republican, isn't it? ย Therefore, impeachment will never happen (unless a large number of Republicans go rogue, of course). ย The Democrats have the majority in the house, but not the Senate.
|
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
Posts โข 1,766
Likes โข 1,852
March 2017
|
Donald Trump, by Chris JL on May 30, 2019 12:29:52 GMT 1, I think this is a spot on summary:
... and thatโs the same conclusion that any intellectually honest person alphabetised enough to read the report had already reached weeks ago...
I think this is a spot on summary:
... and thatโs the same conclusion that any intellectually honest person alphabetised enough to read the report had already reached weeks ago...
|
|
|
Donald Trump, by Coach on May 30, 2019 12:38:11 GMT 1, I think this is a spot on summary: ... and thatโs the same conclusion that any intellectually honest person alphabetised enough to read the report had already reached weeks ago...
Who is Elizabeth Warren?
I think this is a spot on summary: ... and thatโs the same conclusion that any intellectually honest person alphabetised enough to read the report had already reached weeks ago... Who is Elizabeth Warren?
|
|
Hairbland
Junior Member
Posts โข 2,943
Likes โข 2,731
November 2010
|
Donald Trump, by Hairbland on May 30, 2019 12:39:51 GMT 1, I donโt profess to know much about the workings of US politics. But isnโt it the case that, in principle, he could be impeached rather than indicted? I'm also somewhat ignorant on the workings of US policies but impeachment, as far as I know, does not remove a president from office or send him to jail. ย It simply means it goes to a vote amongst the House of Representatives and with a Republican majority I think we all know what the outcome of that will be. The commentary seems to be that this is why he began running for re-election from day one of his presidency. He can be indicted on these charges after he is not president but there is a 5 year statute of limitations - which would run out if he was re-elected. So we will see him run like no one has ever run before, turning the bile up to 11, higher if possible. It is also why they want to hold the Senate, for example him and his son telling Moore to not run in Alabama. He needs to maintain the Senate and get re-elected, pretty much a matter of life of death, a free or jail situation.
I donโt profess to know much about the workings of US politics. But isnโt it the case that, in principle, he could be impeached rather than indicted? I'm also somewhat ignorant on the workings of US policies but impeachment, as far as I know, does not remove a president from office or send him to jail. ย It simply means it goes to a vote amongst the House of Representatives and with a Republican majority I think we all know what the outcome of that will be. The commentary seems to be that this is why he began running for re-election from day one of his presidency. He can be indicted on these charges after he is not president but there is a 5 year statute of limitations - which would run out if he was re-elected. So we will see him run like no one has ever run before, turning the bile up to 11, higher if possible. It is also why they want to hold the Senate, for example him and his son telling Moore to not run in Alabama. He needs to maintain the Senate and get re-elected, pretty much a matter of life of death, a free or jail situation.
|
|
|
Hairbland
Junior Member
Posts โข 2,943
Likes โข 2,731
November 2010
|
Donald Trump, by Hairbland on May 30, 2019 12:41:00 GMT 1, I think this is a spot on summary: ... and thatโs the same conclusion that any intellectually honest person alphabetised enough to read the report had already reached weeks ago... Who is Elizabeth Warren? Smart woman running for Pres, progressive. Currently ranking 3rd behind Biden and Bernie.
I think this is a spot on summary: ... and thatโs the same conclusion that any intellectually honest person alphabetised enough to read the report had already reached weeks ago... Who is Elizabeth Warren? Smart woman running for Pres, progressive. Currently ranking 3rd behind Biden and Bernie.
|
|
Dive Jedi
Junior Member
Posts โข 6,160
Likes โข 9,391
October 2015
|
Donald Trump, by Dive Jedi on May 30, 2019 12:41:42 GMT 1, I think this is a spot on summary: ... and thatโs the same conclusion that any intellectually honest person alphabetised enough to read the report had already reached weeks ago... Who is Elizabeth Warren? bfy.tw/4sBq
I think this is a spot on summary: ... and thatโs the same conclusion that any intellectually honest person alphabetised enough to read the report had already reached weeks ago... Who is Elizabeth Warren? bfy.tw/4sBq
|
|
Chris JL
Junior Member
Posts โข 1,766
Likes โข 1,852
March 2017
|
Donald Trump, by Chris JL on May 30, 2019 13:40:06 GMT 1, I think this is a spot on summary: ... and thatโs the same conclusion that any intellectually honest person alphabetised enough to read the report had already reached weeks ago... Who is Elizabeth Warren?
A serious and respected scholar and author (a bankruptcy law and consumer finance expert). Formerly full law professor at U Michigan, U Texas, Harvard etc. The intellectual force that brought about the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (that the current White House has been dismantling) and several parts of the Dodd-Frank act. US senator from Massachusetts. And currently the presidential candidate with the most articulate policy platform (and with budgets that do add up!): elizabethwarren.com/issues/
... but Trumpistas will call her a lefty radical... lying of course as usual, since she is actually a centrist policy wise, and was a registered republican until 1996...
I think this is a spot on summary: ... and thatโs the same conclusion that any intellectually honest person alphabetised enough to read the report had already reached weeks ago... Who is Elizabeth Warren? A serious and respected scholar and author (a bankruptcy law and consumer finance expert). Formerly full law professor at U Michigan, U Texas, Harvard etc. The intellectual force that brought about the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (that the current White House has been dismantling) and several parts of the Dodd-Frank act. US senator from Massachusetts. And currently the presidential candidate with the most articulate policy platform (and with budgets that do add up!): elizabethwarren.com/issues/... but Trumpistas will call her a lefty radical... lying of course as usual, since she is actually a centrist policy wise, and was a registered republican until 1996...
|
|
Deleted
Posts โข 0
Likes โข
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on May 31, 2019 11:14:56 GMT 1, The latest insane idea from Donald Trump.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-48469408
The guy's a blithering idiot. How do tariffs stop illegal migration??? In fact, it will probably *increase* illegal migration. Mexicans try to enter the US for a better life. You make Mexican life harder, then more not less people will try to enter the US illegally.
The latest insane idea from Donald Trump. www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-48469408The guy's a blithering idiot. How do tariffs stop illegal migration??? In fact, it will probably *increase* illegal migration. Mexicans try to enter the US for a better life. You make Mexican life harder, then more not less people will try to enter the US illegally.
|
|
stelio
New Member
Posts โข 391
Likes โข 555
May 2014
|
Donald Trump, by stelio on May 31, 2019 12:21:06 GMT 1, .... In fact, it will probably *increase* illegal migration. Mexicans try to enter the US for a better life. You make Mexican life harder, then more not less people will try to enter the US illegally.
This administration is probably hoping for that. Gotta give his fan based something to be fired up about come election cycle. Sprinkle in a little War with the Iran and he will probably coast to reelection, unfortunately. Although the sad part is he doesnโt have to do any of it to get 4 more years. The DNC will once again stack the deck in favor of the candidate it likes the most, Biden, like they did for HRC last election cycle. It will once again be one of the main reasons Trump will win in 2020.
.... In fact, it will probably *increase* illegal migration. Mexicans try to enter the US for a better life. You make Mexican life harder, then more not less people will try to enter the US illegally. This administration is probably hoping for that. Gotta give his fan based something to be fired up about come election cycle. Sprinkle in a little War with the Iran and he will probably coast to reelection, unfortunately. Although the sad part is he doesnโt have to do any of it to get 4 more years. The DNC will once again stack the deck in favor of the candidate it likes the most, Biden, like they did for HRC last election cycle. It will once again be one of the main reasons Trump will win in 2020.
|
|
Prive
New Member
Posts โข 173
Likes โข 97
May 2018
|
Donald Trump, by Prive on May 31, 2019 15:10:48 GMT 1, .... In fact, it will probably *increase* illegal migration. Mexicans try to enter the US for a better life. You make Mexican life harder, then more not less people will try to enter the US illegally. This administration is probably hoping for that. Gotta give his fan based something to be fired up about come election cycle. Sprinkle in a little War with the Iran and he will probably coast to reelection, unfortunately. Although the sad part is he doesnโt have to do any of it to get 4 more years. The DNC will once again stack the deck in favor of the candidate it likes the most, Biden, like they did for HRC last election cycle. It will once again be one of the main reasons Trump will win in 2020. I don't see any evidence of the DNC stacking the deck this time like there was for Hillary. I think they've been incredibly open regarding potential candidates. What are we at, almost 20 Dem candidates having met the thresholds to be included in the first debate? Last year there were only Clinton, Sanders, and OMalley. And they've also doubled the number debates as well, from 6 to 12. Still a long way to go and the DNC could still F it up, but they're doing the right stuff so far.
While I'm here, I'll point out that with the recent stock market swoon, Donald now ranks 4th out of the last 5 presidents in stock market (DJIA) performance through 28 months of presidency. Obama: +57.1% Clinton: +34.9% GHWBush: +29.3% Trump: +26.7 GWBush: -18.7%.
.... In fact, it will probably *increase* illegal migration. Mexicans try to enter the US for a better life. You make Mexican life harder, then more not less people will try to enter the US illegally. This administration is probably hoping for that. Gotta give his fan based something to be fired up about come election cycle. Sprinkle in a little War with the Iran and he will probably coast to reelection, unfortunately. Although the sad part is he doesnโt have to do any of it to get 4 more years. The DNC will once again stack the deck in favor of the candidate it likes the most, Biden, like they did for HRC last election cycle. It will once again be one of the main reasons Trump will win in 2020. I don't see any evidence of the DNC stacking the deck this time like there was for Hillary. I think they've been incredibly open regarding potential candidates. What are we at, almost 20 Dem candidates having met the thresholds to be included in the first debate? Last year there were only Clinton, Sanders, and OMalley. And they've also doubled the number debates as well, from 6 to 12. Still a long way to go and the DNC could still F it up, but they're doing the right stuff so far. While I'm here, I'll point out that with the recent stock market swoon, Donald now ranks 4th out of the last 5 presidents in stock market (DJIA) performance through 28 months of presidency. Obama: +57.1% Clinton: +34.9% GHWBush: +29.3% Trump: +26.7 GWBush: -18.7%.
|
|
Deleted
Posts โข 0
Likes โข
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on May 31, 2019 19:33:41 GMT 1, The latest insane idea from Donald Trump. www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-48469408The guy's a blithering idiot. How do tariffs stop illegal migration??? In fact, it will probably *increase* illegal migration. Mexicans try to enter the US for a better life. You make Mexican life harder, then more not less people will try to enter the US illegally. Well perhaps it makes the Mexican government a little more inspired to not roll out a red carpet for all the illegal migrants and drugs wanting to enter the US but actually guard their border?
The latest insane idea from Donald Trump. www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-48469408The guy's a blithering idiot. How do tariffs stop illegal migration??? In fact, it will probably *increase* illegal migration. Mexicans try to enter the US for a better life. You make Mexican life harder, then more not less people will try to enter the US illegally. Well perhaps it makes the Mexican government a little more inspired to not roll out a red carpet for all the illegal migrants and drugs wanting to enter the US but actually guard their border?
|
|
Deleted
Posts โข 0
Likes โข
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on May 31, 2019 19:36:28 GMT 1, I think this is a spot on summary: ... and thatโs the same conclusion that any intellectually honest person alphabetised enough to read the report had already reached weeks ago... Who is Elizabeth Warren? A crazy leftwing radical running for president, who has been claiming to be a native American and actually took a DNA test to show proof, which showed she was about as native American as I am a bisexual Polish nun.
I think this is a spot on summary: ... and thatโs the same conclusion that any intellectually honest person alphabetised enough to read the report had already reached weeks ago... Who is Elizabeth Warren? A crazy leftwing radical running for president, who has been claiming to be a native American and actually took a DNA test to show proof, which showed she was about as native American as I am a bisexual Polish nun.
|
|
|
|
Donald Trump, by Coach on May 31, 2019 20:15:22 GMT 1, A crazy leftwing radical running for president, who has been claiming to be a native American and actually took a DNA test to show proof, which showed she was about as native American as I am a bisexual Polish nun.
๐คฆโโ๏ธ
A crazy leftwing radical running for president, who has been claiming to be a native American and actually took a DNA test to show proof, which showed she was about as native American as I am a bisexual Polish nun. ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
|
|
blerd
Junior Member
Posts โข 1,345
Likes โข 1,195
November 2016
|
Donald Trump, by blerd on May 31, 2019 20:23:37 GMT 1, A crazy leftwing radical running for president, who has been claiming to be a native American and actually took a DNA test to show proof, which showed she was about as native American as I am a bisexual Polish nun. ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
๐
A crazy leftwing radical running for president, who has been claiming to be a native American and actually took a DNA test to show proof, which showed she was about as native American as I am a bisexual Polish nun. ๐คฆโโ๏ธ ๐
|
|
South Bound
Junior Member
Posts โข 1,483
Likes โข 1,125
May 2014
|
Donald Trump, by South Bound on May 31, 2019 20:32:13 GMT 1, I would be interested to know where those posting on this thread are from? I live in the heart of Trump country and I find some comments to be quite interesting.
I would be interested to know where those posting on this thread are from? I live in the heart of Trump country and I find some comments to be quite interesting.
|
|
Deleted
Posts โข 0
Likes โข
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on May 31, 2019 23:47:48 GMT 1, I would be interested to know where those posting on this thread are from? I live in the heart of Trump country and I find some comments to be quite interesting. The Netherlands represent.
I would be interested to know where those posting on this thread are from? I live in the heart of Trump country and I find some comments to be quite interesting. The Netherlands represent.
|
|
South Bound
Junior Member
Posts โข 1,483
Likes โข 1,125
May 2014
|
Donald Trump, by South Bound on May 31, 2019 23:53:34 GMT 1, I would be interested to know where those posting on this thread are from? I live in the heart of Trump country and I find some comments to be quite interesting. The Netherlands represent. thanks Blanksky,
To everyone else, donโt worry, I have no intention of criticizing or promoting your POV, I just feel it might give a little context to various thoughts / opinions.
I would be interested to know where those posting on this thread are from? I live in the heart of Trump country and I find some comments to be quite interesting. The Netherlands represent. thanks Blanksky, To everyone else, donโt worry, I have no intention of criticizing or promoting your POV, I just feel it might give a little context to various thoughts / opinions.
|
|
Deleted
Posts โข 0
Likes โข
January 1970
|
Donald Trump, by Deleted on May 31, 2019 23:56:30 GMT 1, The Netherlands represent. thanks Blanksky, To everyone else, donโt worry, I have no intention of criticizing or promoting your POV, I just feel it might give a little context to various thoughts / opinions. Curious, why might you think so?
The Netherlands represent. thanks Blanksky, To everyone else, donโt worry, I have no intention of criticizing or promoting your POV, I just feel it might give a little context to various thoughts / opinions. Curious, why might you think so?
|
|
|
Donald Trump, by Coach on Jun 1, 2019 0:14:03 GMT 1, The Netherlands represent. thanks Blanksky, To everyone else, donโt worry, I have no intention of criticizing or promoting your POV, I just feel it might give a little context to various thoughts / opinions.
I know a few people from the Netherlands. They would not like to think that blanksky represents them!
The Netherlands represent. thanks Blanksky, To everyone else, donโt worry, I have no intention of criticizing or promoting your POV, I just feel it might give a little context to various thoughts / opinions. I know a few people from the Netherlands. They would not like to think that blanksky represents them!
|
|
South Bound
Junior Member
Posts โข 1,483
Likes โข 1,125
May 2014
|
Donald Trump, by South Bound on Jun 1, 2019 0:56:24 GMT 1, thanks Blanksky, To everyone else, donโt worry, I have no intention of criticizing or promoting your POV, I just feel it might give a little context to various thoughts / opinions. Curious, why might you think so?ย I think it is always important to understand the lens through which people view events / life when engaged in (or observing) a debate.
In regards to Politics, your location is a โlensโ that can provide a lot of insight.
thanks Blanksky, To everyone else, donโt worry, I have no intention of criticizing or promoting your POV, I just feel it might give a little context to various thoughts / opinions. Curious, why might you think so?ย I think it is always important to understand the lens through which people view events / life when engaged in (or observing) a debate. In regards to Politics, your location is a โlensโ that can provide a lot of insight.
|
|