|
|
Poster Bob
Junior Member
🗨️ 5,900
👍🏻 5,543
September 2013
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by Poster Bob on Jun 12, 2019 13:30:18 GMT 1, Lots of duds in that auction. I am most interested in what that tiny Stik canvas will sell for.
Lots of duds in that auction. I am most interested in what that tiny Stik canvas will sell for.
|
|
kuni
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,153
👍🏻 1,818
February 2018
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by kuni on Jun 12, 2019 13:44:43 GMT 1, Some possible duds but some fairly desirable pieces as well. That invader triptych is pretty badass, and it will be interesting to see if that crosses over 200k. The fighter plane nose done by Kenny Scharf is interesting.
Some possible duds but some fairly desirable pieces as well. That invader triptych is pretty badass, and it will be interesting to see if that crosses over 200k. The fighter plane nose done by Kenny Scharf is interesting.
|
|
irl1
Full Member
🗨️ 9,274
👍🏻 9,381
December 2017
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by irl1 on Jun 12, 2019 13:45:14 GMT 1, Lots of duds in that auction. I am most interested in what that tiny Stik canvas will sell for.
Where they are going with the price of the SEEN i don't know.
There will be many on here glued to this to see what the Brooklyn Museum and MOCAD prints go for. 
Lots of duds in that auction. I am most interested in what that tiny Stik canvas will sell for. Yes there are a few duds alright but as i said "some" nice lots. Where they are going with the price of the SEEN i don't know. There will be many on here glued to this to see what the Brooklyn Museum and MOCAD prints go for. |
|
irl1
Full Member
🗨️ 9,274
👍🏻 9,381
December 2017
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by irl1 on Jun 18, 2019 18:25:45 GMT 1, Lots of duds in that auction. I am most interested in what that tiny Stik canvas will sell for.
Lots of duds in that auction. I am most interested in what that tiny Stik canvas will sell for. 14 bids now at $6,000 with 7 days to go |
|
|
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by Charlie Bronson on Jun 22, 2019 17:22:55 GMT 1, This is from the private collection of Roger Gastman...the creator of Beyond The Streets
This is from the private collection of Roger Gastman...the creator of Beyond The Streets
|
|
|
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by Deleted on Jun 25, 2019 18:04:17 GMT 1, A Brooklyn Print just hammered for $12k ex. Fees
A Brooklyn Print just hammered for $12k ex. Fees
|
|
pr.yu
New Member
🗨️ 496
👍🏻 633
June 2017
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by pr.yu on Jun 25, 2019 18:59:33 GMT 1, Stik mini canvas is smaller than my hand. And at 10K plus premium.
Stik mini canvas is smaller than my hand. And at 10K plus premium.
|
|
Swishhh
New Member
🗨️ 423
👍🏻 283
February 2019
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by Swishhh on Jun 25, 2019 19:22:55 GMT 1, A Brooklyn Print just hammered for $12k ex. Fees
A Brooklyn Print just hammered for $12k ex. Fees Wild pricing, the MOCAD print just went for $6k ex. fees |
|
Deleted
🗨️ 0
👍🏻
January 1970
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by Deleted on Jun 25, 2019 19:29:58 GMT 1, Stik mini canvas is smaller than my hand. And at 10K plus premium.
Still going
Stik mini canvas is smaller than my hand. And at 10K plus premium. Still going |
|
|
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by kindhearts on Jun 25, 2019 19:36:51 GMT 1, sold for $14,000 plus 20% buyers. So $16,800USD. wow
sold for $14,000 plus 20% buyers. So $16,800USD. wow
|
|
|
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by The Silence on Jul 2, 2019 1:27:58 GMT 1, Stik mini canvas is smaller than my hand. And at 10K plus premium.
😮😮
Stik mini canvas is smaller than my hand. And at 10K plus premium. 😮😮 |
|
|
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by The Silence on Jul 2, 2019 1:28:51 GMT 1, Any way to see the results form this?
Any way to see the results form this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by The Observer on Jul 7, 2019 17:45:53 GMT 1, It will be interesting to see the final price on this one
It will be interesting to see the final price on this one
|
|
Winter
Junior Member
🗨️ 7,157
👍🏻 4,461
March 2007
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by Winter on Jul 7, 2019 18:41:25 GMT 1, I reckon it will just make the reserve at $20k
I reckon it will just make the reserve at $20k
|
|
|
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by campfire headphase on Jul 7, 2019 20:03:32 GMT 1, I reckon it will just make the reserve at $20k
Tough to say. Many people snoozed on it and wanted one on release. I think it will go up by a bit at the last minute. Not sure why the seller chose Artnet though. They don’t have a good exposure latitude. I’d be more curious to see what this would have done at Sotheby’s or Christie’s.
I reckon it will just make the reserve at $20k Tough to say. Many people snoozed on it and wanted one on release. I think it will go up by a bit at the last minute. Not sure why the seller chose Artnet though. They don’t have a good exposure latitude. I’d be more curious to see what this would have done at Sotheby’s or Christie’s. |
|
irl1
Full Member
🗨️ 9,274
👍🏻 9,381
December 2017
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by irl1 on Jul 7, 2019 20:07:26 GMT 1, I reckon it will just make the reserve at $20k Tough to say. Many people snoozed on it and wanted one on release. I think it will go up by a bit at the last minute. Not sure why the seller chose Artnet though. They don’t have a good exposure latitude. I’d be more curious to see what this would have done at Sotheby’s or Christie’s.
I reckon it will just make the reserve at $20k Tough to say. Many people snoozed on it and wanted one on release. I think it will go up by a bit at the last minute. Not sure why the seller chose Artnet though. They don’t have a good exposure latitude. I’d be more curious to see what this would have done at Sotheby’s or Christie’s. Most use artnet because there are no seller fees for any piece over 10k |
|
irl1
Full Member
🗨️ 9,274
👍🏻 9,381
December 2017
|
|
|
Winter
Junior Member
🗨️ 7,157
👍🏻 4,461
March 2007
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by Winter on Jul 10, 2019 9:35:04 GMT 1, Interesting article, there’s no question he’s an excellent artist. When Hockney attends your shows you must be doing something right.
Looks like reserve has been met on this piece.
Interesting article, there’s no question he’s an excellent artist. When Hockney attends your shows you must be doing something right.
Looks like reserve has been met on this piece.
|
|
coller
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,385
👍🏻 2,372
April 2015
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by coller on Jul 10, 2019 23:51:08 GMT 1, so where'd it end at?
so where'd it end at?
|
|
|
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by campfire headphase on Jul 11, 2019 3:43:00 GMT 1,
About 27k usd including taxes and fees for a print that was outside the regular edition. Regular releases tend to be worth a bit more. Price is bout right on point.
About 27k usd including taxes and fees for a print that was outside the regular edition. Regular releases tend to be worth a bit more. Price is bout right on point. |
|
|
|
19818914
Junior Member
🗨️ 1,337
👍🏻 1,029
October 2018
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by 19818914 on Jul 11, 2019 4:01:06 GMT 1, Wow I’d pay a million dollars for that.
Wow I’d pay a million dollars for that.
|
|
coller
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,385
👍🏻 2,372
April 2015
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by coller on Jul 11, 2019 7:05:15 GMT 1, About 27k usd including taxes and fees for a print that was outside the regular edition. Regular releases tend to be worth a bit more. Price is bout right on point.
About 27k usd including taxes and fees for a print that was outside the regular edition. Regular releases tend to be worth a bit more. Price is bout right on point. so what was the actual hammer price before taxes and fees? 20k? |
|
Unica
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,078
👍🏻 1,234
November 2013
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by Unica on Jul 11, 2019 7:11:25 GMT 1, Fantastic print, I really like the Cirrus prints when they combine lithography and screen prints. The 2014 pots are IMO his best prints but "Shelf Life" and "Speaker Life" were made in a similar process and are very good.
Fantastic print, I really like the Cirrus prints when they combine lithography and screen prints. The 2014 pots are IMO his best prints but "Shelf Life" and "Speaker Life" were made in a similar process and are very good.
|
|
|
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by campfire headphase on Jul 11, 2019 12:11:10 GMT 1, About 27k usd including taxes and fees for a print that was outside the regular edition. Regular releases tend to be worth a bit more. Price is bout right on point. so what was the actual hammer price before taxes and fees? 20k?
Hammer price isn’t the value though as that isn’t what the winner paid. Market is set by what someone is willing to pay. Whoever won that awesome print new that with that hammer, they would end up closer to 27k. Great print. Should have gone for more. 26-27k all in isn’t bad when these were 15k 7 months ago. PP’s also don’t sell for as much as the recognized edition. Curious as to how much higher it would have gone at a more prestigious auction house like Christie’s.
About 27k usd including taxes and fees for a print that was outside the regular edition. Regular releases tend to be worth a bit more. Price is bout right on point. so what was the actual hammer price before taxes and fees? 20k? Hammer price isn’t the value though as that isn’t what the winner paid. Market is set by what someone is willing to pay. Whoever won that awesome print new that with that hammer, they would end up closer to 27k. Great print. Should have gone for more. 26-27k all in isn’t bad when these were 15k 7 months ago. PP’s also don’t sell for as much as the recognized edition. Curious as to how much higher it would have gone at a more prestigious auction house like Christie’s. |
|
|
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by campfire headphase on Jul 11, 2019 12:13:50 GMT 1, Fantastic print, I really like the Cirrus prints when they combine lithography and screen prints. The 2014 pots are IMO his best prints but "Shelf Life" and "Speaker Life" were made in a similar process and are very good.
I’ve got the 2014s and the shelf and speaker prints. They’re all really nice. The 2014 pots... there is something special about them. I think it’s the scale. It was an ambitious size.
Fantastic print, I really like the Cirrus prints when they combine lithography and screen prints. The 2014 pots are IMO his best prints but "Shelf Life" and "Speaker Life" were made in a similar process and are very good. I’ve got the 2014s and the shelf and speaker prints. They’re all really nice. The 2014 pots... there is something special about them. I think it’s the scale. It was an ambitious size. |
|
coller
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,385
👍🏻 2,372
April 2015
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by coller on Jul 11, 2019 12:36:54 GMT 1, so what was the actual hammer price before taxes and fees? 20k? Hammer price isn’t the value though as that isn’t what the winner paid. Market is set by what someone is willing to pay. Whoever won that awesome print new that with that hammer, they would end up closer to 27k. Great print. Should have gone for more. 26-27k all in isn’t bad when these were 15k 7 months ago. PP’s also don’t sell for as much as the recognized edition. Curious as to how much higher it would have gone at a more prestigious auction house like Christie’s.
and PPs pretty much always sell for more than the recognized edition, so not sure where that bit came from. also weren't these 18k from cirrus, rather than 15k?
so what was the actual hammer price before taxes and fees? 20k? Hammer price isn’t the value though as that isn’t what the winner paid. Market is set by what someone is willing to pay. Whoever won that awesome print new that with that hammer, they would end up closer to 27k. Great print. Should have gone for more. 26-27k all in isn’t bad when these were 15k 7 months ago. PP’s also don’t sell for as much as the recognized edition. Curious as to how much higher it would have gone at a more prestigious auction house like Christie’s. most people view hammer price as the value; taxes and fees don't replicate. kind of odd that you won't say what it was tbh. and PPs pretty much always sell for more than the recognized edition, so not sure where that bit came from. also weren't these 18k from cirrus, rather than 15k? |
|
|
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by campfire headphase on Jul 11, 2019 12:42:52 GMT 1, 15k release on the shelf still life. 18k was the Speaker. I didn’t mention hammer price because it was listed plainly on artnet. AP and TPs I agree are more valuable as they’re artist owned or unique. Generally, I have found that printer/employee owned don’t go for the same value as regular, artist owned or unique tps. Replicating or not, that person didn’t pay 20k, they paid 26-27k for that print. The first auction for it and a really solid number for a great print.
15k release on the shelf still life. 18k was the Speaker. I didn’t mention hammer price because it was listed plainly on artnet. AP and TPs I agree are more valuable as they’re artist owned or unique. Generally, I have found that printer/employee owned don’t go for the same value as regular, artist owned or unique tps. Replicating or not, that person didn’t pay 20k, they paid 26-27k for that print. The first auction for it and a really solid number for a great print.
|
|
Unica
Junior Member
🗨️ 2,078
👍🏻 1,234
November 2013
|
Artnet Auctions 🇺🇲, by Unica on Jul 11, 2019 12:48:28 GMT 1, I view the price as the the total price paid, the buyer didn't just pay the hammer price. The buyer paid hammer price and all the fees.
When you buy at auction I assume you also pay buyers premium, ARR and shipping etc
If i'm budgeting to buy at auction I always factor another 30% on top of hammer.
I view the price as the the total price paid, the buyer didn't just pay the hammer price. The buyer paid hammer price and all the fees.
When you buy at auction I assume you also pay buyers premium, ARR and shipping etc
If i'm budgeting to buy at auction I always factor another 30% on top of hammer.
|
|
