|
Dirty Funker Printers Proof (not the vinyl but print), by Acme Thunderer on Jul 28, 2021 10:35:22 GMT 1, Just seen this available at a local auction (it’s not mine and don’t know who owns it). I know there will be some forum members who will be VERY interested in this unusual item as it’s a double printers proof. If I hadn’t spent so much recently I would be all over this. Hopefully someone here can get it (let me know afterwards if you do).
If Laz had this, what would he sell it for?
There are also some Hirst, Lichenstein, Blake prints also available in the same auction so worth checking out.
www.the-saleroom.com/en-gb/auction-catalogues/stamford/catalogue-id-the-st10074/lot-a30637cc-9134-4e48-9f68-ad4300bfe907
Just seen this available at a local auction (it’s not mine and don’t know who owns it). I know there will be some forum members who will be VERY interested in this unusual item as it’s a double printers proof. If I hadn’t spent so much recently I would be all over this. Hopefully someone here can get it (let me know afterwards if you do). If Laz had this, what would he sell it for? There are also some Hirst, Lichenstein, Blake prints also available in the same auction so worth checking out. www.the-saleroom.com/en-gb/auction-catalogues/stamford/catalogue-id-the-st10074/lot-a30637cc-9134-4e48-9f68-ad4300bfe907
|
|
matgab
New Member
Posts • 506
Likes • 179
November 2015
|
Dirty Funker Printers Proof (not the vinyl but print), by matgab on Jul 28, 2021 10:37:07 GMT 1, WOW.
WOW.
|
|
|
Dirty Funker Printers Proof (not the vinyl but print), by DAVID HOCKNEY on Jul 28, 2021 10:42:56 GMT 1, 'screen print'
Lol
'screen print'
Lol
|
|
|
Dirty Funker Printers Proof (not the vinyl but print), by Terry Fuckwitt on Jul 28, 2021 10:43:42 GMT 1, It's a fake though. No different to buying a PP of WCP.
It's a fake though. No different to buying a PP of WCP.
|
|
|
Dirty Funker Printers Proof (not the vinyl but print), by Acme Thunderer on Jul 28, 2021 10:49:35 GMT 1, It's a fake though. No different to buying a PP of WCP. No fake - it is a printers proof of this record. I have been to enough printing presses to know exactly what this is.
www.discogs.com/Dirty-Funker-Lets-Get-Dirty-/release/10581636
|
|
|
Dirty Funker Printers Proof (not the vinyl but print), by Acme Thunderer on Jul 28, 2021 10:51:22 GMT 1, It’s actually a 4 colour litho on a gloss coated board (see the bleed and printers marks), but I didn’t write the auction description.
It’s actually a 4 colour litho on a gloss coated board (see the bleed and printers marks), but I didn’t write the auction description.
|
|
|
|
Dirty Funker Printers Proof (not the vinyl but print), by Terry Fuckwitt on Jul 28, 2021 10:58:40 GMT 1,
Yeah, a genuine PP of a fake Banksy
Yeah, a genuine PP of a fake Banksy
|
|
Gurn
New Member
Posts • 894
Likes • 904
August 2007
|
Dirty Funker Printers Proof (not the vinyl but print), by Gurn on Jul 28, 2021 11:12:43 GMT 1, Yeah, a genuine PP of a fake Banksy
This.
Yeah, a genuine PP of a fake Banksy This.
|
|
jp226
Junior Member
Posts • 1,052
Likes • 907
July 2010
|
Dirty Funker Printers Proof (not the vinyl but print), by jp226 on Jul 29, 2021 1:41:48 GMT 1, For one, 90% of the LP's are not authorized Banksy pieces. Furthermore, anyone with a printer and photoshop skills could make this 'PP'.
For one, 90% of the LP's are not authorized Banksy pieces. Furthermore, anyone with a printer and photoshop skills could make this 'PP'.
|
|
|
|
Dirty Funker Printers Proof (not the vinyl but print), by Acme Thunderer on Jul 29, 2021 4:03:59 GMT 1, This signed AP of a Lichenstein is from the same auction/estate as well. I guess this has to be another fake as it’s only a litho!
This signed AP of a Lichenstein is from the same auction/estate as well. I guess this has to be another fake as it’s only a litho!
|
|
bestdj777
New Member
Posts • 439
Likes • 335
January 2019
|
Dirty Funker Printers Proof (not the vinyl but print), by bestdj777 on Jul 29, 2021 4:16:47 GMT 1, I think you are missing the point. Regardless of whether this is from 2006, it isn’t an authorized Banksy record album. They likely stole his image and used it without his permission and without compensating him. So, whether this really is a printers proof of the album or not is irrelevant.
I think you are missing the point. Regardless of whether this is from 2006, it isn’t an authorized Banksy record album. They likely stole his image and used it without his permission and without compensating him. So, whether this really is a printers proof of the album or not is irrelevant.
|
|
|
Dirty Funker Printers Proof (not the vinyl but print), by Acme Thunderer on Jul 29, 2021 4:32:54 GMT 1, I think you are missing the point. Regardless of whether this is from 2006, it isn’t an authorized Banksy record album. They likely stole his image and used it without his permission and without compensating him. So, whether this really is a printers proof of the album or not is irrelevant. In the early 2000s, Banksy actually encouraged people to copy and reproduce his work which is a fact (although he probably regrets now). He even had high res images on his website to be downloaded as he wanted his art to be shared. But I’m sure Banksy is doing well enough to worry about some old record covers. I am justifying that this auction isn’t a 2021 knock off (as not on Tate Ward).
I think you are missing the point. Regardless of whether this is from 2006, it isn’t an authorized Banksy record album. They likely stole his image and used it without his permission and without compensating him. So, whether this really is a printers proof of the album or not is irrelevant. In the early 2000s, Banksy actually encouraged people to copy and reproduce his work which is a fact (although he probably regrets now). He even had high res images on his website to be downloaded as he wanted his art to be shared. But I’m sure Banksy is doing well enough to worry about some old record covers. I am justifying that this auction isn’t a 2021 knock off (as not on Tate Ward).
|
|
|
Dirty Funker Printers Proof (not the vinyl but print), by Acme Thunderer on Jul 29, 2021 4:38:57 GMT 1, In the early 2000s, Banksy actually encouraged people to copy and reproduce his work which is a fact. He even had high res images on his website to be downloaded as he wanted his art to be shared. But I’m sure Banksy is doing well enough to worry about some old record covers. I am justifying that this is auction isn’t a 2021 knock off (as not on Tate Ward). It sounds like you have some bad news coming your way based on the comments here... I’m simply sharing an auction of some items I found that members may be interested in. If you’re not interested then happy for you to jog on…
In the early 2000s, Banksy actually encouraged people to copy and reproduce his work which is a fact. He even had high res images on his website to be downloaded as he wanted his art to be shared. But I’m sure Banksy is doing well enough to worry about some old record covers. I am justifying that this is auction isn’t a 2021 knock off (as not on Tate Ward). It sounds like you have some bad news coming your way based on the comments here... I’m simply sharing an auction of some items I found that members may be interested in. If you’re not interested then happy for you to jog on…
|
|
|
Spenie
Junior Member
Posts • 1,255
Likes • 2,164
November 2014
|
Dirty Funker Printers Proof (not the vinyl but print), by Spenie on Jul 29, 2021 11:31:49 GMT 1, Crazy that someone will pay £700 for something with no association to Banksy apart from stealing his image.
Crazy that someone will pay £700 for something with no association to Banksy apart from stealing his image.
|
|
|
|
Dirty Funker Printers Proof (not the vinyl but print), by Terry Fuckwitt on Jul 29, 2021 12:09:29 GMT 1, This auction house should not be listing it as 'banksy' at all. They are either misleading potential buyers or naive to what it is they are selling.
This auction house should not be listing it as 'banksy' at all. They are either misleading potential buyers or naive to what it is they are selling.
|
|
john1539
New Member
Posts • 765
Likes • 121
May 2009
|
Dirty Funker Printers Proof (not the vinyl but print), by john1539 on Jul 29, 2021 13:40:31 GMT 1, Hi, I have the feeling that maybe we might know who is the consignor of some of these AP/PP pieces...
Hi, I have the feeling that maybe we might know who is the consignor of some of these AP/PP pieces...
|
|
Philpenn
New Member
Posts • 412
Likes • 163
July 2010
|
Dirty Funker Printers Proof (not the vinyl but print), by Philpenn on Jul 29, 2021 13:44:01 GMT 1, Had never seen that Tate Ward auction result. Wow.
Had never seen that Tate Ward auction result. Wow.
|
|
|
Dirty Funker Printers Proof (not the vinyl but print), by Acme Thunderer on Jul 29, 2021 13:51:47 GMT 1, Hi, I have the feeling that maybe we might know who is the consignor of some of these AP/PP pieces... Who is that then? And do not even attempt to say me.
Hi, I have the feeling that maybe we might know who is the consignor of some of these AP/PP pieces... Who is that then? And do not even attempt to say me.
|
|
eD
New Member
Posts • 280
Likes • 286
June 2021
|
Dirty Funker Printers Proof (not the vinyl but print), by eD on Jul 30, 2021 14:38:34 GMT 1, Well...consider this - 'Acme Thunderer' is an anagram of 'Ted Underpants' who just so happens to work for Old Dead People Auctioneers Business...coincidence....someone's just been Miss Marple'd!
No further questions your honor!
Well...consider this - 'Acme Thunderer' is an anagram of 'Ted Underpants' who just so happens to work for Old Dead People Auctioneers Business...coincidence....someone's just been Miss Marple'd!
No further questions your honor!
|
|
bonesy
Junior Member
Posts • 1,386
Likes • 264
July 2006
|
|
|
|
|