Tommy Tucker
New Member
Posts • 902
Likes • 527
Member is Online
November 2011
|
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun, by Tommy Tucker on Oct 16, 2020 21:08:02 GMT 1, Hey,
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun
Archival pigment print on 290 gsm 100% cotton archival paper. Straight cut, signed and numbered by the artist.
20h x 16w inches
Edition of 150
$925 USD
Hey, Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun Archival pigment print on 290 gsm 100% cotton archival paper. Straight cut, signed and numbered by the artist. 20h x 16w inches Edition of 150 $925 USD |
|
gmidd
Junior Member
Addicted2Art.com
Posts • 1,245
Likes • 797
April 2014
|
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun, by gmidd on Oct 17, 2020 3:06:39 GMT 1, Damn, looks like I sold mine for way too little, haha. It's a great print! GLWTS
Damn, looks like I sold mine for way too little, haha. It's a great print! GLWTS
|
|
londonfx
Junior Member
Posts • 1,163
Likes • 707
December 2013
|
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun, by londonfx on Oct 17, 2020 8:27:10 GMT 1,
Lovely print in the flesh!!!!
Lovely print in the flesh!!!!
|
|
Tommy Tucker
New Member
Posts • 902
Likes • 527
Member is Online
November 2011
|
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun, by Tommy Tucker on Oct 20, 2020 16:29:01 GMT 1, Price change, I've been told far too optimistic.
Price excludes shipping and fees
Price change, I've been told far too optimistic.
Price excludes shipping and fees
|
|
orchid
Junior Member
Posts • 1,446
Likes • 1,135
May 2018
|
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun, by orchid on Oct 20, 2020 17:06:45 GMT 1, Price change, I've been told far too optimistic. Price excludes shipping and fees
Triple flip on booby prize print was always too much.
Price change, I've been told far too optimistic. Price excludes shipping and fees Triple flip on booby prize print was always too much. |
|
Deleted
Posts • 0
Likes •
January 1970
|
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun, by Deleted on Oct 20, 2020 20:54:24 GMT 1, Is this the price these are fliping these days? Like it!
Is this the price these are fliping these days? Like it!
|
|
|
|
Bodega Cat
New Member
Posts • 247
Likes • 94
October 2020
|
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun, by Bodega Cat on Oct 20, 2020 21:11:43 GMT 1, Sick print. Shoulda picked it up when I had the chance. GLWTS
Sick print. Shoulda picked it up when I had the chance. GLWTS
|
|
cest
Junior Member
Posts • 1,725
Likes • 1,160
September 2018
|
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun, by cest on Oct 21, 2020 0:41:31 GMT 1, Is this really a print, are Xerox copies a print?
I understand it is an edition, but this is just spit out of a color printer
Is this really a print, are Xerox copies a print?
I understand it is an edition, but this is just spit out of a color printer
|
|
anodyne13
New Member
Posts • 432
Likes • 212
April 2008
|
|
|
state
New Member
Posts • 243
Likes • 181
June 2020
|
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun, by state on Oct 22, 2020 16:13:11 GMT 1, the quality of this print is nothing like self portrait of artist on narrow street. Still a great print overall, GLWS
the quality of this print is nothing like self portrait of artist on narrow street. Still a great print overall, GLWS
|
|
DrWhite
Junior Member
Posts • 4,107
Likes • 5,395
August 2012
|
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun, by DrWhite on Oct 22, 2020 17:01:02 GMT 1, the quality of this print is nothing like self portrait of artist on narrow street. Still a great print overall, GLWS
That should help his sale along 🤦♂️
the quality of this print is nothing like self portrait of artist on narrow street. Still a great print overall, GLWS That should help his sale along 🤦♂️ |
|
state
New Member
Posts • 243
Likes • 181
June 2020
|
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun, by state on Oct 22, 2020 17:38:31 GMT 1, the quality of this print is nothing like self portrait of artist on narrow street. Still a great print overall, GLWS That should help his sale along 🤦♂️
the quality of this print is nothing like self portrait of artist on narrow street. Still a great print overall, GLWS That should help his sale along 🤦♂️ hes flipping a print released 2 months ago. If a buyer is paying premium might as well know what to expect |
|
DrWhite
Junior Member
Posts • 4,107
Likes • 5,395
August 2012
|
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun, by DrWhite on Oct 22, 2020 17:40:35 GMT 1, That should help his sale along 🤦♂️ hes flipping a print released 2 months ago. If a buyer is paying premium might as well know what to expect
Poor form IMHO
That should help his sale along 🤦♂️ hes flipping a print released 2 months ago. If a buyer is paying premium might as well know what to expect Poor form IMHO |
|
state
New Member
Posts • 243
Likes • 181
June 2020
|
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun, by state on Oct 22, 2020 17:41:41 GMT 1, hes flipping a print released 2 months ago. If a buyer is paying premium might as well know what to expect Poor form IMHO
hes flipping a print released 2 months ago. If a buyer is paying premium might as well know what to expect Poor form IMHO fair enough.. cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun, by Sunny Garcia on Oct 22, 2020 18:07:06 GMT 1, It’s a tough one...
Poor form on the person discussing the actual quality of the print? Or poor form on the person flipping it a month later, when there may very well also be a “no-resell for one year” clause attached to it? All of their stuff coming out now seems to have this stated.
I know it’s the age old debate between flipping and not, but maybe this isn’t the best place to “advertise” flips? If someone posts an “In Search Of” and you reach out privately, that’s different. The blatant straight up flipping seems to just ruffle feathers.
Carry on, and GLWTS. His work is really great!
It’s a tough one...
Poor form on the person discussing the actual quality of the print? Or poor form on the person flipping it a month later, when there may very well also be a “no-resell for one year” clause attached to it? All of their stuff coming out now seems to have this stated.
I know it’s the age old debate between flipping and not, but maybe this isn’t the best place to “advertise” flips? If someone posts an “In Search Of” and you reach out privately, that’s different. The blatant straight up flipping seems to just ruffle feathers.
Carry on, and GLWTS. His work is really great!
|
|
iamzero
Full Member
Posts • 9,190
Likes • 8,541
May 2011
|
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun, by iamzero on Oct 22, 2020 18:18:16 GMT 1, I actually quite like the look of that print.
I actually quite like the look of that print.
|
|
wave100
New Member
Posts • 135
Likes • 69
January 2020
|
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun, by wave100 on Oct 22, 2020 18:36:40 GMT 1, I actually quite like the look of that print.
I actually quite like the look of that print. Agreed. Jammie's work has been selling for quite a bit too. I believe a canvas recently sold at auction for 55k. |
|
|
|
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun, by Eastend Boy 13 on Oct 23, 2020 9:56:09 GMT 1, Have there been any resales of the self portrait print does anyone know?
Have there been any resales of the self portrait print does anyone know?
|
|
met
Junior Member
Posts • 2,680
Likes • 6,288
June 2009
|
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun, by met on Oct 23, 2020 12:53:33 GMT 1, It’s a tough one... Poor form on the person discussing the actual quality of the print? Or poor form on the person flipping it a month later, when there may very well also be a “no-resell for one year” clause attached to it? All of their stuff coming out now seems to have this stated. I know it’s the age old debate between flipping and not, but maybe this isn’t the best place to “advertise” flips? If someone posts an “In Search Of” and you reach out privately, that’s different. The blatant straight up flipping seems to just ruffle feathers. Carry on, and GLWTS. His work is really great!
This is possibly a failure to see the wood for the trees.
Rather than focusing on flipping or quality of printing, my recommendation would be to first have a proper look at Jammie Holmes's body of work.
That work to me is embarrassing. Not merely derivative in style, but hackneyed. It's at the level of an art college portfolio-preparation course — with all of the clichés and immediately-obvious influences one would expect from that.
As with Mr. Brainwash or the Connor Brothers, I ascribe a large part of Holmes's present commercial appeal to art-historical ignorance by the market. And herd mentality, i.e. people being far-too-easily swayed (whether by fellow collectors, the artist's representation, or fawning media / social media coverage) and buying with their ears.
__________
Below are sample paintings featured in a 2019 softball interview with Holmes. If members are able to view such Basquiat-parody amateurism without discomfort, then their threshold for pain is impressively high:
voyagedallas.com/interview/check-jammie-holmess-artwork/
It’s a tough one... Poor form on the person discussing the actual quality of the print? Or poor form on the person flipping it a month later, when there may very well also be a “no-resell for one year” clause attached to it? All of their stuff coming out now seems to have this stated. I know it’s the age old debate between flipping and not, but maybe this isn’t the best place to “advertise” flips? If someone posts an “In Search Of” and you reach out privately, that’s different. The blatant straight up flipping seems to just ruffle feathers. Carry on, and GLWTS. His work is really great! This is possibly a failure to see the wood for the trees. Rather than focusing on flipping or quality of printing, my recommendation would be to first have a proper look at Jammie Holmes's body of work. That work to me is embarrassing. Not merely derivative in style, but hackneyed. It's at the level of an art college portfolio-preparation course — with all of the clichés and immediately-obvious influences one would expect from that. As with Mr. Brainwash or the Connor Brothers, I ascribe a large part of Holmes's present commercial appeal to art-historical ignorance by the market. And herd mentality, i.e. people being far-too-easily swayed (whether by fellow collectors, the artist's representation, or fawning media / social media coverage) and buying with their ears. __________ Below are sample paintings featured in a 2019 softball interview with Holmes. If members are able to view such Bas quiat-parody amateurism without discomfort, then their threshold for pain is impressively high: voyagedallas.com/interview/check-jammie-holmess-artwork/ |
|
orchid
Junior Member
Posts • 1,446
Likes • 1,135
May 2018
|
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun, by orchid on Oct 24, 2020 9:21:40 GMT 1, Price change, I've been told far too optimistic. Price excludes shipping and fees
Glwtf!
Price change, I've been told far too optimistic. Price excludes shipping and fees Glwtf! |
|
Passion Art
Junior Member
Posts • 1,027
Likes • 317
April 2007
|
Jammie Holmes - Pop Gun, by Passion Art on Oct 24, 2020 12:42:37 GMT 1, It’s a tough one... Poor form on the person discussing the actual quality of the print? Or poor form on the person flipping it a month later, when there may very well also be a “no-resell for one year” clause attached to it? All of their stuff coming out now seems to have this stated. I know it’s the age old debate between flipping and not, but maybe this isn’t the best place to “advertise” flips? If someone posts an “In Search Of” and you reach out privately, that’s different. The blatant straight up flipping seems to just ruffle feathers. Carry on, and GLWTS. His work is really great! This is possibly a failure to see the wood for the trees. Rather than focusing on flipping or quality of printing, my recommendation would be to first have a proper look at Jammie Holmes's body of work. That work to me is embarrassing. Not merely derivative in style, but hackneyed. It's at the level of an art college portfolio-preparation course — with all of the clichés and immediately-obvious influences one would expect from that. As with Mr. Brainwash or the Connor Brothers, I ascribe a large part of Holmes's present commercial appeal to art-historical ignorance by the market. And herd mentality, i.e. people being far-too-easily swayed (whether by fellow collectors, the artist's representation, or fawning media / social media coverage) and buying with their ears. __________ Below are sample paintings featured in a 2019 softball interview with Holmes. If members are able to view such Bas quiat-parody amateurism without discomfort, then their threshold for pain is impressively high: voyagedallas.com/interview/check-jammie-holmess-artwork/
Are artists not allowed to evolve? You’re not wrong about prior work but you are about his older work but that’s not a disqualifying factor. For a self taught artist to have explored while finding a style and not know that this is looked down upon by the art elite feels like it says more about the art elite then it does about jammie or any other artist finding their way
It’s a tough one... Poor form on the person discussing the actual quality of the print? Or poor form on the person flipping it a month later, when there may very well also be a “no-resell for one year” clause attached to it? All of their stuff coming out now seems to have this stated. I know it’s the age old debate between flipping and not, but maybe this isn’t the best place to “advertise” flips? If someone posts an “In Search Of” and you reach out privately, that’s different. The blatant straight up flipping seems to just ruffle feathers. Carry on, and GLWTS. His work is really great! This is possibly a failure to see the wood for the trees. Rather than focusing on flipping or quality of printing, my recommendation would be to first have a proper look at Jammie Holmes's body of work. That work to me is embarrassing. Not merely derivative in style, but hackneyed. It's at the level of an art college portfolio-preparation course — with all of the clichés and immediately-obvious influences one would expect from that. As with Mr. Brainwash or the Connor Brothers, I ascribe a large part of Holmes's present commercial appeal to art-historical ignorance by the market. And herd mentality, i.e. people being far-too-easily swayed (whether by fellow collectors, the artist's representation, or fawning media / social media coverage) and buying with their ears. __________ Below are sample paintings featured in a 2019 softball interview with Holmes. If members are able to view such Bas quiat-parody amateurism without discomfort, then their threshold for pain is impressively high: voyagedallas.com/interview/check-jammie-holmess-artwork/Are artists not allowed to evolve? You’re not wrong about prior work but you are about his older work but that’s not a disqualifying factor. For a self taught artist to have explored while finding a style and not know that this is looked down upon by the art elite feels like it says more about the art elite then it does about jammie or any other artist finding their way |
|
