19818914
Member
Posts: 1,337
Member Since: October 2018
|
Harland Miller "In Shadows I Boogie" Signing tonight!, by 19818914 on Jul 24, 2019 17:28:49 GMT 1, I’m loving these smaller prints like Vote and the Miller. They slot in anywhere.
Made for the walls not the drawers. And easy to move around the home when things get boring.
I’m loving these smaller prints like Vote and the Miller. They slot in anywhere. Made for the walls not the drawers. And easy to move around the home when things get boring. |
|
hubblebubble
Member
Posts: 3,770
Member Since: December 2010
|
Harland Miller "In Shadows I Boogie" Signing tonight!, by hubblebubble on Jul 24, 2019 17:56:24 GMT 1, My smallest Banksy is my most valuable. My smallest Hockney is my most valuable. My smallest Invader is my most valuable. Size and price point are variables. For me, quality, potential longevity and image relevance to the artist's oeuvre are the key drivers when assessing the cost of a work. I don't buy art by the square meter. (Disclosure - I bought a HM 'Boogie')
My smallest Banksy is my most valuable. My smallest Hockney is my most valuable. My smallest Invader is my most valuable. Size and price point are variables. For me, quality, potential longevity and image relevance to the artist's oeuvre are the key drivers when assessing the cost of a work. I don't buy art by the square meter. (Disclosure - I bought a HM 'Boogie')
|
|
lv90210
Member
Posts: 1,303 
Member is Online
Member Since: January 2018
|
Harland Miller "In Shadows I Boogie" Signing tonight!, by lv90210 on Jul 24, 2019 17:59:25 GMT 1, My smallest Banksy is my most valuable. My smallest Hockney is my most valuable. My smallest Invader is my most valuable. Size and price point are variables. For me, quality, potential longevity and image relevance to the artist's oeuvre are the key drivers when assessing the cost of a work. I don't buy art by the square meter. (Disclosure - I bought a HM 'Boogie')
Your small weener as well I would imagine .....
My smallest Banksy is my most valuable. My smallest Hockney is my most valuable. My smallest Invader is my most valuable. Size and price point are variables. For me, quality, potential longevity and image relevance to the artist's oeuvre are the key drivers when assessing the cost of a work. I don't buy art by the square meter. (Disclosure - I bought a HM 'Boogie') Your small weener as well I would imagine ..... |
|
hubblebubble
Member
Posts: 3,770
Member Since: December 2010
|
Harland Miller "In Shadows I Boogie" Signing tonight!, by hubblebubble on Jul 24, 2019 18:09:32 GMT 1, My smallest Banksy is my most valuable. My smallest Hockney is my most valuable. My smallest Invader is my most valuable. Size and price point are variables. For me, quality, potential longevity and image relevance to the artist's oeuvre are the key drivers when assessing the cost of a work. I don't buy art by the square meter. (Disclosure - I bought a HM 'Boogie') Your small weener as well I would imagine .....
My smallest Banksy is my most valuable. My smallest Hockney is my most valuable. My smallest Invader is my most valuable. Size and price point are variables. For me, quality, potential longevity and image relevance to the artist's oeuvre are the key drivers when assessing the cost of a work. I don't buy art by the square meter. (Disclosure - I bought a HM 'Boogie') Your small weener as well I would imagine ..... Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water... |
|
expresspost
Member
Posts: 3,218
Member Since: January 2008
|
Harland Miller "In Shadows I Boogie" Signing tonight!, by expresspost on Jul 24, 2019 18:24:18 GMT 1, We don't know which images you got, so it is hard to quantify.
It is possible to own a di-faced tenner and a soup cans poster and your statement about banksy would still be true, but misleading about smaller being most valuable.
My smallest Banksy is my most valuable. My smallest Hockney is my most valuable. My smallest Invader is my most valuable. Size and price point are variables. For me, quality, potential longevity and image relevance to the artist's oeuvre are the key drivers when assessing the cost of a work. I don't buy art by the square meter. (Disclosure - I bought a HM 'Boogie')
We don't know which images you got, so it is hard to quantify. It is possible to own a di-faced tenner and a soup cans poster and your statement about banksy would still be true, but misleading about smaller being most valuable. My smallest Banksy is my most valuable. My smallest Hockney is my most valuable. My smallest Invader is my most valuable. Size and price point are variables. For me, quality, potential longevity and image relevance to the artist's oeuvre are the key drivers when assessing the cost of a work. I don't buy art by the square meter. (Disclosure - I bought a HM 'Boogie') |
|
hubblebubble
Member
Posts: 3,770
Member Since: December 2010
|
Harland Miller "In Shadows I Boogie" Signing tonight!, by hubblebubble on Jul 24, 2019 18:33:34 GMT 1, We don't know which images you got, so it is hard to quantify. It is possible to own a di-faced tenner and a soup cans poster and your statement about banksy would still be true, but misleading about smaller being most valuable. My smallest Banksy is my most valuable. My smallest Hockney is my most valuable. My smallest Invader is my most valuable. Size and price point are variables. For me, quality, potential longevity and image relevance to the artist's oeuvre are the key drivers when assessing the cost of a work. I don't buy art by the square meter. (Disclosure - I bought a HM 'Boogie')
I didn't say 'smaller is most valuable'. Apologies if it came across that way. I was simply trying to demonstrate, by highlighting pieces from within my own collection, that to say something should be priced less than something else simply because it covers a smaller surface area isn't necessarily the best metric when assessing whether to purchase.
We don't know which images you got, so it is hard to quantify. It is possible to own a di-faced tenner and a soup cans poster and your statement about banksy would still be true, but misleading about smaller being most valuable. My smallest Banksy is my most valuable. My smallest Hockney is my most valuable. My smallest Invader is my most valuable. Size and price point are variables. For me, quality, potential longevity and image relevance to the artist's oeuvre are the key drivers when assessing the cost of a work. I don't buy art by the square meter. (Disclosure - I bought a HM 'Boogie') That's exactly my point... it's about the image, not about the size. I didn't say 'smaller is most valuable'. Apologies if it came across that way. I was simply trying to demonstrate, by highlighting pieces from within my own collection, that to say something should be priced less than something else simply because it covers a smaller surface area isn't necessarily the best metric when assessing whether to purchase. |
|
19818914
Member
Posts: 1,337
Member Since: October 2018
|
Harland Miller "In Shadows I Boogie" Signing tonight!, by 19818914 on Jul 24, 2019 21:53:52 GMT 1, I’m definitely talking about the image quality too. I understand the size discussion all too well.
It just seems we tend to inflate the value of the things we own.
I’m definitely talking about the image quality too. I understand the size discussion all too well.
It just seems we tend to inflate the value of the things we own.
|
|
