Katsu 🇺🇸 BTM Graffiti Crew • Art For Sale

[thomasmer]

I always forget how Daily Mail the Urban art forum is.

[Hairbland]

Jul 17, 2018 23:44:05 GMT 1 @blanksky said:

Jul 17, 2018 21:53:01 GMT 1 kalm said:

Trump puts comedians who make fun of him on the “No Fly List.”

Wait what in the actual fuck. Kathy Griffin didn't 'make fun' of Trump. She proudly posed with a Trump like decapitated head. Please point me to the 'fun' in that horrific scene.

She should be extremely happy the right has defended freedom of speech up until a point where you can do this and not be in jail for the rest of your life.

Unless you are in the NFL.

[Deleted]

Jul 21, 2018 3:41:17 GMT 1 amsterdam9697 said:

Jul 11, 2018 22:14:38 GMT 1 @blanksky said:

I'd be a very happy camper would I have been an American with Trump as president. Country has never been better. It's sad the left has radicalized so much. The man could singlehandedly cure cancer only for the left to blame him he didn't cure aids in the process.

You don't have a fvcking clue what you're talking about, Dutchie. Trump's a cancer and you're a clueless tourist.

Are you saying you hate foreigners?

[Deleted]

Jul 21, 2018 3:44:20 GMT 1 amsterdam9697 said:

Jul 11, 2018 22:52:16 GMT 1 @blanksky said:

If you are moderately right, far right, centre, or moderately left, you'd see the country is doing great. It's only the far left (which sadly have taken over media and education and scream the loudest) would claim the country is doing bad.

Seriously, you are fvcking clueless. How the fvck would know how things are on this side of the pond? You live in Holland. Tourist with an clueless opinion. Nothing more.

You actually sound like how a comedian would portray a typical bigoted Trump voter. 

[nex]

‘Keeping people poor by drowning them in benefits’

That’s literally the most idiotic thing I’ve read here in a while

[kalm]

Conservatives only care about themselves.

[Deleted]

Jul 21, 2018 21:44:25 GMT 1 nex said:

‘Keeping people poor by drowning them in benefits’

That’s literally the most idiotic thing I’ve read here in a while

You should look beyond the short term effects, think about it a little, and post again.

[moron]

Jul 21, 2018 21:44:25 GMT 1 nex said:

‘Keeping people poor by drowning them in benefits’

That’s literally the most idiotic thing I’ve read here in a while

 and theres me thinking "white privelidge" is the most idiotic thing posted on this forum.

[moron]

Worth watching for anyone with an attention span of more than two minutes.

[moron]

 A work of genius from Sasha Baron Cohen.

It's comedy but in some ways it could be reality and it's frightening.

[qest]

Jul 11, 2018 23:47:31 GMT 1 @blanksky said:

Jul 11, 2018 23:46:18 GMT 1 Kevin Anderson said:

You abhor fascism, but are okay with Trump? Who’s clueless?

Could you elaborate on how Trump is a fascist? 

www.nytimes.com/2018/07/23/us/politics/trump-security-clearances.html

[moron]

Jul 23, 2018 20:45:52 GMT 1 qest said:

Jul 11, 2018 23:47:31 GMT 1 @blanksky said:

Could you elaborate on how Trump is a fascist? 

www.nytimes.com/2018/07/23/us/politics/trump-security-clearances.html

 Good article and Trump is doing what he has to do. I'm sure if it was the other way round and Obama or Clinton are President they would do the same regarding people who worked for the previous president and who have criticised them. It's nothing to do with fascism though.


"WASHINGTON — President Trump is considering whether to revoke the security clearances of former national security and law enforcement officials who served in the Obama administration and have criticized Mr. Trump,"

[moron]

Jul 11, 2018 21:33:02 GMT 1 kalm said:

$175 




www.beyondthestreets.com/shop/katsu-lump-trump-print

 
 It's good to see that this image of Trump appeals to you.

Katsu makes some interesting artworks www.wired.com/story/elon-musk-posters-katsu-art/

 I'm not sure about the timing though as the poster seems to be saying Trump should be beaten up.

Isn't that all a bit Lenin 1917 regarding democracy?

[qest]

Jul 23, 2018 21:09:25 GMT 1 moron said:

Jul 23, 2018 20:45:52 GMT 1 qest said:

www.nytimes.com/2018/07/23/us/politics/trump-security-clearances.html

 Good article and Trump is doing what he has to do. I'm sure if it was the other way round and Obama or Clinton are President they would do the same regarding people who worked for the previous president and who have criticised them. It's nothing to do with fascism though.


"WASHINGTON — President Trump is considering whether to revoke the security clearances of former national security and law enforcement officials who served in the Obama administration and have criticized Mr. Trump,"

Of course - punishing people for exercising their right to free speech has "nothing to do with fascism."

[moron]

Jul 23, 2018 21:16:54 GMT 1 qest said:

Jul 23, 2018 21:09:25 GMT 1 moron said:

 Good article and Trump is doing what he has to do. I'm sure if it was the other way round and Obama or Clinton are President they would do the same regarding people who worked for the previous president and who have criticised them. It's nothing to do with fascism though.


"WASHINGTON — President Trump is considering whether to revoke the security clearances of former national security and law enforcement officials who served in the Obama administration and have criticized Mr. Trump,"

Of course - punishing people for exercising their right to free speech has "nothing to do with fascism."

For example, would you employ someone who critcised you and who also worked for a rival company, hypothetically of course.

[qest]

Jul 23, 2018 21:21:40 GMT 1 moron said:

Jul 23, 2018 21:16:54 GMT 1 qest said:

Of course - punishing people for exercising their right to free speech has "nothing to do with fascism."

For example, would you employ someone who critcised you and who also worked for a rival company, hypothetically of course.

Of course not - in your lousy analogy, Trump should be fired for his statements and actions regarding Russia.  

Back to the matter at hand, Trump is (considering) using his authority to punish private citizens who were exercising their first amendment rights.  That kind of retaliation has a chilling effect on speech.  Textbook fascism, you must be so proud.

[Deleted]

Jul 23, 2018 21:29:49 GMT 1 qest said:

Jul 23, 2018 21:21:40 GMT 1 moron said:

For example, would you employ someone who critcised you and who also worked for a rival company, hypothetically of course.

Of course not - in your lousy analogy, Trump should be fired for his statements and actions regarding Russia.  

Back to the matter at hand, Trump is (considering) using his authority to punish private citizens who were exercising their first amendment rights.  That kind of retaliation has a chilling effect on speech.  Textbook fascism, you must be so proud.

How is taking away a security clearance 'punishing private citizens' exactly? Why are they entitled to have such a security clearance when they are not working in their former jobs anymore?

[qest]

Jul 23, 2018 21:56:13 GMT 1 @blanksky said:

Jul 23, 2018 21:29:49 GMT 1 qest said:

Of course not - in your lousy analogy, Trump should be fired for his statements and actions regarding Russia.  

Back to the matter at hand, Trump is (considering) using his authority to punish private citizens who were exercising their first amendment rights.  That kind of retaliation has a chilling effect on speech.  Textbook fascism, you must be so proud.

How is taking away a security clearance 'punishing private citizens' exactly? Why are they entitled to have such a security clearance when they are not working in their former jobs anymore?

It affects their ability to work in the private sector.  Security clearances are often essential there, and are common among people who work with government contractors. 

It compromises their ability to advise the acting administration (not that this is an issue now, but this is a valuable thing that has historically used between administrations). 

Even threatening to revoke clearances discourages private speech because of the impact it may have on their sources of income.  It's clearly retaliatory, it's clearly designed to chill further dissent, it's clearly fascist.

[Deleted]

Jul 23, 2018 22:04:07 GMT 1 qest said:

Jul 23, 2018 21:56:13 GMT 1 @blanksky said:

How is taking away a security clearance 'punishing private citizens' exactly? Why are they entitled to have such a security clearance when they are not working in their former jobs anymore?

It affects their ability to work in the private sector.  Security clearances are often essential there, and are common among people who work with government contractors. 

It compromises their ability to advise the acting administration (not that this is an issue now, but this is a valuable thing that has historically used between administrations). 

Even threatening to revoke clearances discourages private speech because of the impact it may have on their sources of income.  It's clearly retaliatory, it's clearly designed to chill further dissent, it's clearly fascist.

But why should they be able to use their 'secret' government knowledge in the private sector when they don't work for the government anymore? How long do they keep their security clearance normally? Like, forever? That seems really weird to me.

[qest]

Jul 23, 2018 22:21:57 GMT 1 @blanksky said:

Jul 23, 2018 22:04:07 GMT 1 qest said:

It affects their ability to work in the private sector.  Security clearances are often essential there, and are common among people who work with government contractors. 

It compromises their ability to advise the acting administration (not that this is an issue now, but this is a valuable thing that has historically used between administrations). 

Even threatening to revoke clearances discourages private speech because of the impact it may have on their sources of income.  It's clearly retaliatory, it's clearly designed to chill further dissent, it's clearly fascist.

But why should they be able to use their 'secret' government knowledge in the private sector when they don't work for the government anymore? How long do they keep their security clearance normally? Like, forever? That seems really weird to me.

Security clearances can be obtained and maintained by non-government personnel.  There's no reason to revoke them here other than retaliation for private speech.  I would think that you and moron would have a problem with that.  If not, imagine if it were President Hillary Clinton taking the same action against people speaking against her.

[Deleted]

Jul 23, 2018 22:24:49 GMT 1 qest said:

Jul 23, 2018 22:21:57 GMT 1 @blanksky said:

But why should they be able to use their 'secret' government knowledge in the private sector when they don't work for the government anymore? How long do they keep their security clearance normally? Like, forever? That seems really weird to me.

Security clearances can be obtained and maintained by non-government personnel.  There's no reason to revoke them here other than retaliation for private speech.  I would think that you and moron would have a problem with that.  If not, imagine if it were President Hillary Clinton taking the same action against people speaking against her.

I don't think it's that black or white. What if they are actively using their presumably top secret clearance to undermine the current establishment? 

But, yes, if the current president is doing this purely out of spite, then I of course agree with you. 

[moron]

Anyways, shouldn't Democrats be lining up now, their best candidate for the 2020 Presidential election?

Who is in the running for the next Democratic presidential nominee?

[Deleted]

Jul 23, 2018 22:36:35 GMT 1 moron said:

Anyways, shouldn't Democrats be lining up now, their best candidate for the 2020 Presidential election?

Who is in the running for the next Democratic presidential nominee?

It kinda depends on which direction they are going with their politics.

If they go all out marxist/socialist, I presume it's going to be Bernie. But I doubt that given how well the economy is doing and how much of that is granted to Trump. 

If they go all out intersectional it's going to be a black woman (Oprah? lol).

Who else?

[moron]

2020 Presidential candidates.

www.politics1.com/p2020.htm

[moron]

I guess for democrats, free speech only works one way.

" Clintons turn IRS into ‘gestapo’

Few federal agencies are more feared and loathed by Americans than the Internal Revenue Service – especially when corrupt presidents abuse the power of the IRS to harass and exact revenge on political enemies. As WND has reported, during Bill Clinton’s terms in office, IRS audits were conducted against individuals and groups who caused problems for the administration. Several prominent conservative groups found themselves facing IRS audits following their criticism of the president and his policies. Among the conservative groups targeted for audits were the Heritage Foundation, the National Rifle Association, Concerned Women of America, Citizens Against Government Waste, National Review, American Spectator (which was burglarized three times), the National Center for Public Policy Research, the American Policy Center, American Cause, Citizens for Honest Government, Progress and Freedom Foundation, David Horowitz’s Center for the Study of Popular Culture and the Western Journalism Center.

Individuals singled out for audits during the administration included Clinton paramours Gennifer Flowers and Liz Ward Gracen, sexual assault accusers Paula Jones and Juanita Broaddrick, fired White House Travel Office Director Billy Dale and attorney Kent Masterson Brown. Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly, an outspoken critic of both Bill and Hillary Clinton, said he was audited three times during the Clinton presidency.

A 1996 survey by the Washington Times could not identify a single liberal public policy organization that had been audited during the entire Clinton administration."

www.wnd.com/2016/07/above-the-law-hillarys-huge-scandal-list-explodes-to-25/

[qest]

Irrelevant and garbage article by a garbage publication citing another garbage publication. In other words, par for course.

[moron]

www.1xrun.com/run/katsu-status-update&ref=pf

[kevinalba94]

I’m interested

[floubi]

I may be on the wrong thread...


KATSU Launches First Semi-Autonomous Smart Painting Drone


Widely recognized as a pioneer of drone painting, KATSU merges public art and technology to progress the development of drone technology in art and activism. After years of research and development, KATSU and Tsuru Robotics have developed the first for-sale smart painting drone, dubbed the “KATSURU BETA.”



The semi-autonomous spray painting drone is controlled manually and uses highly-advanced sensors and software to detect and cling to walls. The KATSURU BETA tracks walls hundreds of feet high, has 10 minutes of flight per battery and uses standard spray paint cans to creates works of enormous scale. “It will be upgradable in late 2020 to full autonomous painting with a vision kit,” KATSU explains, referring to the drone as “an art object and a fully functioning tool.” The limited edition collectible will arrive hand-signed by the artist himself.


katsuru.ai/

Very interesting IMO, but I can't pull the trigger as I don't know how to use a "regular drone"

[liddlejc]

Hya 
I have this print for sale that I got from beyond the streets LA
I'm really not sure on price so excepting offers thanks