Art Fan 2011
Junior Member
Posts • 4,671
Likes • 1,952
February 2012
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by Art Fan 2011 on Jul 18, 2018 15:29:32 GMT 1, ^^ yep, felt like a change - no great deviation from on theme though 
^^ yep, felt like a change - no great deviation from on theme though |
|
gd79
Junior Member
Posts • 1,129
Likes • 1,220
September 2015
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by gd79 on Jul 18, 2018 15:31:54 GMT 1, ^^ yep, felt like a change - no great deviation from on theme though
Sorry, downgrade for me!
^^ yep, felt like a change - no great deviation from on theme though Sorry, downgrade for me! |
|
damenaz
New Member
Posts • 83
Likes • 87
March 2018
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by damenaz on Jul 18, 2018 15:38:22 GMT 1, what is strange is that the entire preview night was made of forum members. Parisians didnt have a clue who pejac was so even those visiting for the rest of the week probably came from the forum. I must know more than 100 people that visited that show and bought a lottery ticket. Multiple lottery tickets. Yet i dont know anyone that actually won!!! Has anyone actually got a drawing??? Ok let me ask; has anyone actually got a drawing / print / other original work, that isnt able to influence (con) others into thinking they need to buy no matter what the price. It seems to me that Max has again ensured prints and drawings have gone to the suck - as**es. Its a dangerous game when only a select few are able to buy his work yet ffor everyone else its impossible to get work from an artist that hasnt actually achieved very much Its no exageration to say he is unknown outside of this forum, the only ones propping up his market are the elite few still throwing money at him because they believe they have the monopoly on his secondary market. im not a framer, im not a plum with more money than sense. I was a genuine fan and made the effort to see the 'non - selling' show in Venice (no free sherbet dabs for guessing who bought those). i made the effort to see the Paris show and bought 5 lottery ticketsand suprisngly still have nothing. If i am happy to pay £5k i can buy a print from any one of the franchishee's. Why should i line the pockets of someone else just because they are up Max's a@@rse. Ironically the same game that managed Dran in the early days when the select few banked as much Dran as they could. Step outside the forum and ask if anyone and ask if anyone has heard of Pejac. The Paris show, the print, the lottery, the Venice show, it stink of market manipulation. And now everyone is hyping Crypta Djan just to suck up to Max, seriously take a step back and open your eyes. F@@@k Pejac and F@@k Suben Art Managmenti wont waste another £20 trying to get an artist that has no CV , let alone lining the pockets of the elite (read: ar@@se kissers) granted access to his work for the sole intention of doubling or trippling their money and creating false hype
And if someone like or not like what MAX makes, I believe that he does everything very and very correctly if we talk about it. First of all the manager should tack the interests of the artist and the artist only. Max my respect for you and what you do
what is strange is that the entire preview night was made of forum members. Parisians didnt have a clue who pejac was so even those visiting for the rest of the week probably came from the forum. I must know more than 100 people that visited that show and bought a lottery ticket. Multiple lottery tickets. Yet i dont know anyone that actually won!!! Has anyone actually got a drawing??? Ok let me ask; has anyone actually got a drawing / print / other original work, that isnt able to influence (con) others into thinking they need to buy no matter what the price. It seems to me that Max has again ensured prints and drawings have gone to the suck - as**es. Its a dangerous game when only a select few are able to buy his work yet ffor everyone else its impossible to get work from an artist that hasnt actually achieved very much Its no exageration to say he is unknown outside of this forum, the only ones propping up his market are the elite few still throwing money at him because they believe they have the monopoly on his secondary market. im not a framer, im not a plum with more money than sense. I was a genuine fan and made the effort to see the 'non - selling' show in Venice (no free sherbet dabs for guessing who bought those). i made the effort to see the Paris show and bought 5 lottery ticketsand suprisngly still have nothing. If i am happy to pay £5k i can buy a print from any one of the franchishee's. Why should i line the pockets of someone else just because they are up Max's a@@rse. Ironically the same game that managed Dran in the early days when the select few banked as much Dran as they could. Step outside the forum and ask if anyone and ask if anyone has heard of Pejac. The Paris show, the print, the lottery, the Venice show, it stink of market manipulation. And now everyone is hyping Crypta Djan just to suck up to Max, seriously take a step back and open your eyes. F@@@k Pejac and F@@k Suben Art Managmenti wont waste another £20 trying to get an artist that has no CV , let alone lining the pockets of the elite (read: ar@@se kissers) granted access to his work for the sole intention of doubling or trippling their money and creating false hype It is interesting to read and surprised how primitive people are. Any conversation even negative speaks only about that Pejac is very popular and in demand. And if someone like or not like what MAX makes, I believe that he does everything very and very correctly if we talk about it. First of all the manager should tack the interests of the artist and the artist only. Max my respect for you and what you do |
|
Deleted
Posts • 0
Likes •
January 1970
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by Deleted on Jul 18, 2018 15:45:54 GMT 1, Sorry to break in your thread for this off-topic question, but would anybody have contact details of Pejac? I don't get response on the e-mail available on his website and need to contact him. Please don't post them here but PM me to protect his privacy. Again, my apologies for the off-topic question.
(and hi everybody, it's been a while, hope you are doing well)
Sorry to break in your thread for this off-topic question, but would anybody have contact details of Pejac? I don't get response on the e-mail available on his website and need to contact him. Please don't post them here but PM me to protect his privacy. Again, my apologies for the off-topic question.
(and hi everybody, it's been a while, hope you are doing well)
|
|
fm1975
Junior Member
Posts • 1,164
Likes • 327
Location: Good dealings with: turntored, pndk, Catman 74, damenaz, Average Joe, Patrick 01... References available from: Sotheby’s, Christie’s, Phillips, Bonhmas, New Art Editions, Jeallous Gallery, Artnet Auctions, Piasa, Subastas Segre,
February 2018
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by fm1975 on Jul 18, 2018 16:07:07 GMT 1, what is strange is that the entire preview night was made of forum members. Parisians didnt have a clue who pejac was so even those visiting for the rest of the week probably came from the forum. I must know more than 100 people that visited that show and bought a lottery ticket. Multiple lottery tickets. Yet i dont know anyone that actually won!!! Has anyone actually got a drawing??? Ok let me ask; has anyone actually got a drawing / print / other original work, that isnt able to influence (con) others into thinking they need to buy no matter what the price. It seems to me that Max has again ensured prints and drawings have gone to the suck - as**es. Its a dangerous game when only a select few are able to buy his work yet ffor everyone else its impossible to get work from an artist that hasnt actually achieved very much Its no exageration to say he is unknown outside of this forum, the only ones propping up his market are the elite few still throwing money at him because they believe they have the monopoly on his secondary market. im not a framer, im not a plum with more money than sense. I was a genuine fan and made the effort to see the 'non - selling' show in Venice (no free sherbet dabs for guessing who bought those). i made the effort to see the Paris show and bought 5 lottery ticketsand suprisngly still have nothing. If i am happy to pay £5k i can buy a print from any one of the franchishee's. Why should i line the pockets of someone else just because they are up Max's a@@rse. Ironically the same game that managed Dran in the early days when the select few banked as much Dran as they could. Step outside the forum and ask if anyone and ask if anyone has heard of Pejac. The Paris show, the print, the lottery, the Venice show, it stink of market manipulation. And now everyone is hyping Crypta Djan just to suck up to Max, seriously take a step back and open your eyes. F@@@k Pejac and F@@k Suben Art Managmenti wont waste another £20 trying to get an artist that has no CV , let alone lining the pockets of the elite (read: ar@@se kissers) granted access to his work for the sole intention of doubling or trippling their money and creating false hype It is interesting to read and surprised how primitive people are. Any conversation even negative speaks only about that Pejac is very popular and in demand. And if someone like or not like what MAX makes, I believe that he does everything very and very correctly if we talk about it. First of all the manager should tack the interests of the artist and the artist only. Max my respect for you and what you do
100% Agree with you.
what is strange is that the entire preview night was made of forum members. Parisians didnt have a clue who pejac was so even those visiting for the rest of the week probably came from the forum. I must know more than 100 people that visited that show and bought a lottery ticket. Multiple lottery tickets. Yet i dont know anyone that actually won!!! Has anyone actually got a drawing??? Ok let me ask; has anyone actually got a drawing / print / other original work, that isnt able to influence (con) others into thinking they need to buy no matter what the price. It seems to me that Max has again ensured prints and drawings have gone to the suck - as**es. Its a dangerous game when only a select few are able to buy his work yet ffor everyone else its impossible to get work from an artist that hasnt actually achieved very much Its no exageration to say he is unknown outside of this forum, the only ones propping up his market are the elite few still throwing money at him because they believe they have the monopoly on his secondary market. im not a framer, im not a plum with more money than sense. I was a genuine fan and made the effort to see the 'non - selling' show in Venice (no free sherbet dabs for guessing who bought those). i made the effort to see the Paris show and bought 5 lottery ticketsand suprisngly still have nothing. If i am happy to pay £5k i can buy a print from any one of the franchishee's. Why should i line the pockets of someone else just because they are up Max's a@@rse. Ironically the same game that managed Dran in the early days when the select few banked as much Dran as they could. Step outside the forum and ask if anyone and ask if anyone has heard of Pejac. The Paris show, the print, the lottery, the Venice show, it stink of market manipulation. And now everyone is hyping Crypta Djan just to suck up to Max, seriously take a step back and open your eyes. F@@@k Pejac and F@@k Suben Art Managmenti wont waste another £20 trying to get an artist that has no CV , let alone lining the pockets of the elite (read: ar@@se kissers) granted access to his work for the sole intention of doubling or trippling their money and creating false hype It is interesting to read and surprised how primitive people are. Any conversation even negative speaks only about that Pejac is very popular and in demand. And if someone like or not like what MAX makes, I believe that he does everything very and very correctly if we talk about it. First of all the manager should tack the interests of the artist and the artist only. Max my respect for you and what you do 100% Agree with you. |
|
Poster Bob
Junior Member
Posts • 5,800
Likes • 5,417
September 2013
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by Poster Bob on Jul 18, 2018 16:26:09 GMT 1, 
Sorry to break in your thread for this off-topic question, but would anybody have contact details of Pejac? I don't get response on the e-mail available on his website and need to contact him. Please don't post them here but PM me to protect his privacy. Again, my apologies for the off-topic question. (and hi everybody, it's been a while, hope you are doing well)
Sorry to break in your thread for this off-topic question, but would anybody have contact details of Pejac? I don't get response on the e-mail available on his website and need to contact him. Please don't post them here but PM me to protect his privacy. Again, my apologies for the off-topic question. (and hi everybody, it's been a while, hope you are doing well) |
|
|
|
Deleted
Posts • 0
Likes •
January 1970
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by Deleted on Jul 18, 2018 16:28:04 GMT 1, I love this post. This is becoming the best thread. Up there with the unsigned invader scandal. I see the point too. But that's the game. I don't think many artists made it big on talent alone. And this thread is just stoking up the heat, playing directly into the buzz. I'm not sure there is another example of quite such a big fish in a small pond though. What auction results? If a pejac went to auction it would be by someone on here, sold to someone on here. And not to a proper house either. I suspect no proper house would bother. My rule is if Phillips don't sell it it isn't safe to invest in. Pejac is not sold there.
So the man or woman at Phillips is the art oracle
we should pay them to come here as our art advisers
They could do a monthly blog or get involved in the why and why not of artists
Invite them, they'll love it here, honest.
If i had time i'd find out who it is and send an invite, but i am going out on a bike ride pub crawl, so can you do it please
ta xx
I love this post. This is becoming the best thread. Up there with the unsigned invader scandal. I see the point too. But that's the game. I don't think many artists made it big on talent alone. And this thread is just stoking up the heat, playing directly into the buzz. I'm not sure there is another example of quite such a big fish in a small pond though. What auction results? If a pejac went to auction it would be by someone on here, sold to someone on here. And not to a proper house either. I suspect no proper house would bother. My rule is if Phillips don't sell it it isn't safe to invest in. Pejac is not sold there. So the man or woman at Phillips is the art oracle we should pay them to come here as our art advisers They could do a monthly blog or get involved in the why and why not of artists Invite them, they'll love it here, honest. If i had time i'd find out who it is and send an invite, but i am going out on a bike ride pub crawl, so can you do it please ta xx |
|
gd79
Junior Member
Posts • 1,129
Likes • 1,220
September 2015
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by gd79 on Jul 18, 2018 16:32:59 GMT 1, My rule is if Phillips don't sell it it isn't safe to invest in. Pejac is not sold there. So the man or woman at Phillips is the art oracle we should pay them to come here as our art advisers They could do a monthly blog or get involved in the why and why not of artists Invite them, they'll love it here, honest. If i had time i'd find out who it is and send an invite, but i am going out on a bike ride pub crawl, so can you do it please ta xx
Some things look good on a wall. Some things sell well and appreciate. I'm sure we all value both, but the auction houses have a near monopoly on what qualifies as the latter.
My rule is if Phillips don't sell it it isn't safe to invest in. Pejac is not sold there. So the man or woman at Phillips is the art oracle we should pay them to come here as our art advisers They could do a monthly blog or get involved in the why and why not of artists Invite them, they'll love it here, honest. If i had time i'd find out who it is and send an invite, but i am going out on a bike ride pub crawl, so can you do it please ta xx Some things look good on a wall. Some things sell well and appreciate. I'm sure we all value both, but the auction houses have a near monopoly on what qualifies as the latter. |
|
|
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by conusmaximus on Jul 18, 2018 16:45:44 GMT 1, my post - was my straight up logical opinion on the scandal - you are entitled to your own - if yours differs - i would suggest that you are suffering from Stockholms syndrome -
how can you enter a lottery/competition- where there is no email confirmation of
1. of being in one
2. no acknowledgment/ consolation of not winning
3. no where to check to see if you won
not even a thank you for taking part - im still trying to figure out whether it was audacity, laziness or the belief that we were all that stupid . - im not - the fix was in - it is illegal crimainal - FRAUD - a sham - a con - trading standards would agree -
my post - was my straight up logical opinion on the scandal - you are entitled to your own - if yours differs - i would suggest that you are suffering from Stockholms syndrome -
how can you enter a lottery/competition- where there is no email confirmation of
1. of being in one
2. no acknowledgment/ consolation of not winning
3. no where to check to see if you won
not even a thank you for taking part - im still trying to figure out whether it was audacity, laziness or the belief that we were all that stupid . - im not - the fix was in - it is illegal crimainal - FRAUD - a sham - a con - trading standards would agree -
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
Posts • 4,844
Likes • 6,763
February 2016
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by nobokov on Jul 18, 2018 16:51:14 GMT 1, my post - was my straight up logical opinion on the scandal - you are entitled to your own - if yours differs - i would suggest that you are suffering from Stockholms syndrome - how can you enter a lottery/competition- where there is no email confirmation of 1. of being in one 2. no acknowledgment/ consolation of not winning 3. no where to check to see if you won not even a thank you for taking part - im still trying to figure out whether it was audacity, laziness or the belief that we were all that stupid . - im not - the fix was in - it is illegal crimainal - FRAUD - a sham - a con - trading standards would agree -
my post - was my straight up logical opinion on the scandal - you are entitled to your own - if yours differs - i would suggest that you are suffering from Stockholms syndrome - how can you enter a lottery/competition- where there is no email confirmation of 1. of being in one 2. no acknowledgment/ consolation of not winning 3. no where to check to see if you won not even a thank you for taking part - im still trying to figure out whether it was audacity, laziness or the belief that we were all that stupid . - im not - the fix was in - it is illegal crimainal - FRAUD - a sham - a con - trading standards would agree - Seems like that would be an arduous task to send it out to all the losers. It would've been nice to have a recorded drawing of the numbers to see whether it was randomized winners. It's a bit paranoid to assume that it's a scam when there were clear winners who posted here. |
|
Dive Jedi
Junior Member
Posts • 6,159
Likes • 9,384
October 2015
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by Dive Jedi on Jul 18, 2018 16:51:31 GMT 1, my post - was my straight up logical opinion on the scandal - you are entitled to your own - if yours differs - i would suggest that you are suffering from Stockholms syndrome - how can you enter a lottery/competition- where there is no email confirmation of 1. of being in one 2. no acknowledgment/ consolation of not winning 3. no where to check to see if you won not even a thank you for taking part - im still trying to figure out whether it was audacity, laziness or the belief that we were all that stupid . - im not - the fix was in - it is illegal crimainal - FRAUD - a sham - a con - trading standards would agree -
basicly with every lottery ticket you buy you
1. Don't get an email confirmation
2. Don't get confirmation of not winning
3. You will get a notification if you do win, so why need a place to check that.
Are you upset you didn't get a Thank you for Participating email ? ?
Maybe lotteries is just not for you…….
my post - was my straight up logical opinion on the scandal - you are entitled to your own - if yours differs - i would suggest that you are suffering from Stockholms syndrome - how can you enter a lottery/competition- where there is no email confirmation of 1. of being in one 2. no acknowledgment/ consolation of not winning 3. no where to check to see if you won not even a thank you for taking part - im still trying to figure out whether it was audacity, laziness or the belief that we were all that stupid . - im not - the fix was in - it is illegal crimainal - FRAUD - a sham - a con - trading standards would agree - Well, basicly with every lottery ticket you buy you 1. Don't get an email confirmation 2. Don't get confirmation of not winning 3. You will get a notification if you do win, so why need a place to check that. Are you upset you didn't get a Thank you for Participating email ? ? Maybe lotteries is just not for you……. |
|
cnrdvln
Junior Member
Posts • 1,401
Likes • 1,487
February 2017
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by cnrdvln on Jul 18, 2018 16:52:20 GMT 1, Honestly conusmaximus tell us how you really feel 
Honestly conusmaximus tell us how you really feel |
|
Flashback
Junior Member
Posts • 1,240
Likes • 1,149
April 2016
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by Flashback on Jul 18, 2018 16:54:28 GMT 1, my post - was my straight up logical opinion on the scandal - you are entitled to your own - if yours differs - i would suggest that you are suffering from Stockholms syndrome - how can you enter a lottery/competition- where there is no email confirmation of 1. of being in one 2. no acknowledgment/ consolation of not winning 3. no where to check to see if you won not even a thank you for taking part - im still trying to figure out whether it was audacity, laziness or the belief that we were all that stupid . - im not - the fix was in - it is illegal crimainal - FRAUD - a sham - a con - trading standards would agree -
my post - was my straight up logical opinion on the scandal - you are entitled to your own - if yours differs - i would suggest that you are suffering from Stockholms syndrome - how can you enter a lottery/competition- where there is no email confirmation of 1. of being in one 2. no acknowledgment/ consolation of not winning 3. no where to check to see if you won not even a thank you for taking part - im still trying to figure out whether it was audacity, laziness or the belief that we were all that stupid . - im not - the fix was in - it is illegal crimainal - FRAUD - a sham - a con - trading standards would agree - logical opinion...of your alt account? |
|
irl1
Full Member
Posts • 9,274
Likes • 9,380
December 2017
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by irl1 on Jul 18, 2018 16:57:30 GMT 1, Simple to sort. Everyone got a number. There were 80 winners. Just post the 80 winning numbers, same as the winning numbers on T.V when you do the lottery. Then you check your number to see if you won.
SIMPLE AS THAT 
Simple to sort. Everyone got a number. There were 80 winners. Just post the 80 winning numbers, same as the winning numbers on T.V when you do the lottery. Then you check your number to see if you won. SIMPLE AS THAT |
|
|
|
|
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by conusmaximus on Jul 18, 2018 17:02:40 GMT 1, Simple to sort. Everyone got a number. There were 80 winners. Just post the 80 winning numbers, same as the winning numbers on T.V when you do the lottery. Then you check your number to see if you won. SIMPLE AS THAT
Simple to sort. Everyone got a number. There were 80 winners. Just post the 80 winning numbers, same as the winning numbers on T.V when you do the lottery. Then you check your number to see if you won. SIMPLE AS THAT second that |
|
alinoe
New Member
Posts • 102
Likes • 194
January 2015
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by alinoe on Jul 18, 2018 17:03:04 GMT 1, I won at the lottery. I'm a nobody. Not in the art world, not rich, wasn't at the show. Was only able to enter the raffle through a kindly forum member. I don't know how many prints were legitimately lotteried off... but it was at least one.
I won at the lottery. I'm a nobody. Not in the art world, not rich, wasn't at the show. Was only able to enter the raffle through a kindly forum member. I don't know how many prints were legitimately lotteried off... but it was at least one.
|
|
|
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by Coach on Jul 18, 2018 17:03:12 GMT 1, Sorry to break in your thread for this off-topic question, but would anybody have contact details of Pejac? I don't get response on the e-mail available on his website and need to contact him. Please don't post them here but PM me to protect his privacy. Again, my apologies for the off-topic question. (and hi everybody, it's been a while, hope you are doing well)
Nice to see a name of old. Hope you are well.
Sorry to break in your thread for this off-topic question, but would anybody have contact details of Pejac? I don't get response on the e-mail available on his website and need to contact him. Please don't post them here but PM me to protect his privacy. Again, my apologies for the off-topic question. (and hi everybody, it's been a while, hope you are doing well) Nice to see a name of old. Hope you are well. |
|
k2
New Member
Posts • 528
Likes • 972
November 2016
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by k2 on Jul 18, 2018 17:06:30 GMT 1, Simple to sort. Everyone got a number. There were 80 winners. Just post the 80 winning numbers, same as the winning numbers on T.V when you do the lottery. Then you check your number to see if you won. SIMPLE AS THAT
Simple to sort. Everyone got a number. There were 80 winners. Just post the 80 winning numbers, same as the winning numbers on T.V when you do the lottery. Then you check your number to see if you won. SIMPLE AS THAT This kind of transparency would be very refreshing. |
|
|
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by Plate Spinner on Jul 18, 2018 17:11:10 GMT 1, A game of walk the plank on the barge would have been fun. Last 80 standing* would get one.
*would have ruled me and many others out 😂
A game of walk the plank on the barge would have been fun. Last 80 standing* would get one.
*would have ruled me and many others out 😂
|
|
|
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by conusmaximus on Jul 18, 2018 17:13:30 GMT 1, I won at the lottery. I'm a nobody. Not in the art world, not rich, wasn't at the show. Was only able to enter the raffle through a kindly forum member. I don't know how many prints were legitimately lotteried off... but it was at least one.
a picture is worth a thousand words - hold it up next to - todays newspaper -
I won at the lottery. I'm a nobody. Not in the art world, not rich, wasn't at the show. Was only able to enter the raffle through a kindly forum member. I don't know how many prints were legitimately lotteried off... but it was at least one. did you receive it - show us - a picture is worth a thousand words - hold it up next to - todays newspaper - |
|
alinoe
New Member
Posts • 102
Likes • 194
January 2015
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by alinoe on Jul 18, 2018 17:14:57 GMT 1, Jesus Christ dude. They sent out emails on the 28th of June saying it'd take four weeks. Being this preoccupied with it, I'd assume you'd know that. I'll glad post once I have it framed.
Jesus Christ dude. They sent out emails on the 28th of June saying it'd take four weeks. Being this preoccupied with it, I'd assume you'd know that. I'll glad post once I have it framed.
|
|
sircoxson
New Member
Posts • 746
Likes • 866
December 2010
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by sircoxson on Jul 18, 2018 17:18:11 GMT 1, I won at the lottery. I'm a nobody. Not in the art world, not rich, wasn't at the show. Was only able to enter the raffle through a kindly forum member. I don't know how many prints were legitimately lotteried off... but it was at least one. did you receive it - show us - a picture is worth a thousand words - hold it up next to - todays newspaper -
I try and solve: conusmaximus, guess you are WILLYBKLN!
I won at the lottery. I'm a nobody. Not in the art world, not rich, wasn't at the show. Was only able to enter the raffle through a kindly forum member. I don't know how many prints were legitimately lotteried off... but it was at least one. did you receive it - show us - a picture is worth a thousand words - hold it up next to - todays newspaper - I try and solve: conusmaximus, guess you are WILLYBKLN! |
|
|
|
juni0209
New Member
Posts • 772
Likes • 536
February 2018
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by juni0209 on Jul 18, 2018 17:27:34 GMT 1, I won at the lottery. I'm a nobody. Not in the art world, not rich, wasn't at the show. Was only able to enter the raffle through a kindly forum member. I don't know how many prints were legitimately lotteried off... but it was at least one.
At least two 😉
I won at the lottery. I'm a nobody. Not in the art world, not rich, wasn't at the show. Was only able to enter the raffle through a kindly forum member. I don't know how many prints were legitimately lotteried off... but it was at least one. At least two 😉 |
|
|
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by conusmaximus on Jul 18, 2018 17:43:36 GMT 1, my post - was my straight up logical opinion on the scandal - you are entitled to your own - if yours differs - i would suggest that you are suffering from Stockholms syndrome - how can you enter a lottery/competition- where there is no email confirmation of 1. of being in one 2. no acknowledgment/ consolation of not winning 3. no where to check to see if you won not even a thank you for taking part - im still trying to figure out whether it was audacity, laziness or the belief that we were all that stupid . - im not - the fix was in - it is illegal crimainal - FRAUD - a sham - a con - trading standards would agree - logical opinion...of your alt account?
do you really think - hand on heart lottery was fair or just a coincidence that you and all the usual suspects got one - keep promoting his pants artists in Birmingham while your at it - JOCK
Read more: urbanartassociation.com/thread/152579/pejac-forest#ixzz5LcolHQKQ
my post - was my straight up logical opinion on the scandal - you are entitled to your own - if yours differs - i would suggest that you are suffering from Stockholms syndrome - how can you enter a lottery/competition- where there is no email confirmation of 1. of being in one 2. no acknowledgment/ consolation of not winning 3. no where to check to see if you won not even a thank you for taking part - im still trying to figure out whether it was audacity, laziness or the belief that we were all that stupid . - im not - the fix was in - it is illegal crimainal - FRAUD - a sham - a con - trading standards would agree - logical opinion...of your alt account? your so far up MAX back passage suprised you aint got his teeth as well - thats how you got yours - do you really think - hand on heart lottery was fair or just a coincidence that you and all the usual suspects got one - keep promoting his pants artists in Birmingham while your at it - JOCK Read more: urbanartassociation.com/thread/152579/pejac-forest#ixzz5LcolHQKQ |
|
Flashback
Junior Member
Posts • 1,240
Likes • 1,149
April 2016
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by Flashback on Jul 18, 2018 17:48:19 GMT 1, Straight up logical opinion...of your alt account? your so far up MAX back passage suprised you aint got his teeth as well - thats how you got yours - do you really think - hand on heart lottery was fair or just a coincidence that you and all the usual suspects got one - keep promoting his pants artists in Birmingham while your at it - JOCK Read more: urbanartassociation.com/thread/152579/pejac-forest#ixzz5LcolHQKQ
You know full well you'll be going for the next Pejac when there is one so your pussy comments are just laughable  - COWARD
Straight up logical opinion...of your alt account? your so far up MAX back passage suprised you aint got his teeth as well - thats how you got yours - do you really think - hand on heart lottery was fair or just a coincidence that you and all the usual suspects got one - keep promoting his pants artists in Birmingham while your at it - JOCK Read more: urbanartassociation.com/thread/152579/pejac-forest#ixzz5LcolHQKQIf you want to have a go come out from behind your alt. You know full well you'll be going for the next Pejac when there is one so your pussy comments are just laughable - COWARD |
|
irl1
Full Member
Posts • 9,274
Likes • 9,380
December 2017
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by irl1 on Jul 18, 2018 17:50:19 GMT 1, Simple to sort. Everyone got a number. There were 80 winners. Just post the 80 winning numbers, same as the winning numbers on T.V when you do the lottery. Then you check your number to see if you won. SIMPLE AS THAT second that
Simple to sort. Everyone got a number. There were 80 winners. Just post the 80 winning numbers, same as the winning numbers on T.V when you do the lottery. Then you check your number to see if you won. SIMPLE AS THAT second that This can still be done. They can post the winning numbers (not names, just the numbers) It would also be extra provenance for the lucky (very lucky) winners. In weeks to come (sorry i mean in years to come) the ticket can be matched to the print by the winning numbers if they decide to sell on. |
|
Gunny
Junior Member
Posts • 1,573
Likes • 1,084
July 2012
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by Gunny on Jul 18, 2018 17:55:59 GMT 1, Was there any hand finished?
Was there any hand finished?
|
|
Deleted
Posts • 0
Likes •
January 1970
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by Deleted on Jul 18, 2018 18:06:12 GMT 1, Was there any hand finished?
Yes
Was there any hand finished? Yes |
|
|
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by Young Squire on Jul 18, 2018 18:06:50 GMT 1, Despite being described as one, in fact, I don't think that this would strictly be classed as a lottery and if it was there might be some legal ramifications.
This was a transaction to purchase a mini print/show card (made all the more pertinent by the need to actually attend in France) with the side benefit that you might get the chance to purchase (not win) one of the limited edition prints. You got what you paid for.
I've met Max and he seems a fair and decent guy. I don't think he should feel the need to publish a list of numbers. Even if he did, someone would just moan that he made them up anyway.
As for looking after a certain ring of clients, this is just good business and something that other artists don't get panned for. I you have a customer who has bought something from you every month for a year and someone you don't know, I know which I would be more inclined to help out.
Despite being described as one, in fact, I don't think that this would strictly be classed as a lottery and if it was there might be some legal ramifications.
This was a transaction to purchase a mini print/show card (made all the more pertinent by the need to actually attend in France) with the side benefit that you might get the chance to purchase (not win) one of the limited edition prints. You got what you paid for.
I've met Max and he seems a fair and decent guy. I don't think he should feel the need to publish a list of numbers. Even if he did, someone would just moan that he made them up anyway.
As for looking after a certain ring of clients, this is just good business and something that other artists don't get panned for. I you have a customer who has bought something from you every month for a year and someone you don't know, I know which I would be more inclined to help out.
|
|
|
|
Pejac • A Forest Print, by conusmaximus on Jul 18, 2018 18:21:58 GMT 1, Despite being described as one, in fact, I don't think that this would strictly be classed as a lottery and if it was there might be some legal ramifications.
This was a transaction to purchase a mini print/show card (made all the more pertinent by the need to actually attend in France) with the side benefit that you might get the chance to purchase (not win) one of the limited edition prints. You got what you paid for.
I've met Max and he seems a fair and decent guy. I don't think he should feel the need to publish a list of numbers. Even if he did, someone would just moan that he made them up anyway.
As for looking after a certain ring of clients, this is just good business and something that other artists don't get panned for. I you have a customer who has bought something from you every month for a year and someone you don't know, I know which I would be more inclined to help out.
Despite being described as one, in fact, I don't think that this would strictly be classed as a lottery and if it was there might be some legal ramifications.
This was a transaction to purchase a mini print/show card (made all the more pertinent by the need to actually attend in France) with the side benefit that you might get the chance to purchase (not win) one of the limited edition prints. You got what you paid for.
I've met Max and he seems a fair and decent guy. I don't think he should feel the need to publish a list of numbers. Even if he did, someone would just moan that he made them up anyway.
As for looking after a certain ring of clients, this is just good business and something that other artists don't get panned for. I you have a customer who has bought something from you every month for a year and someone you don't know, I know which I would be more inclined to help out.
|
|
- COWARD
