Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by Deleted on Jul 22, 2017 23:30:40 GMT 1, It's a shame we are only talking about living artists, otherwise I'd throw Leonora Carrington in to the mix, for the surrealist fans. One time better half to Max Ernst, she was a major contributor to the surrealist movement. For those that want to see more, check out Leonora Carrington Surrealism, Alchemy and Art, published by Lund Humphries. Going surrealist, no one, not even the boys, gets me like Kay Sage. Her works stops me dead in my tracks and terrifies me.
It's a shame we are only talking about living artists, otherwise I'd throw Leonora Carrington in to the mix, for the surrealist fans. One time better half to Max Ernst, she was a major contributor to the surrealist movement. For those that want to see more, check out Leonora Carrington Surrealism, Alchemy and Art, published by Lund Humphries. Going surrealist, no one, not even the boys, gets me like Kay Sage. Her works stops me dead in my tracks and terrifies me. Oh, good call mose! |
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by Deleted on Jul 22, 2017 23:51:13 GMT 1, I forgot Ruth Claxton! Her postcards are genius: www.ruthclaxton.info/work/postcards/
|
|
|
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by Coach on Jul 22, 2017 23:54:18 GMT 1, Thank you. I need to research what I'm looking at there. I need to understand it. Well coach, I had to buy it, I just stood there and was like, wow, it really resonated to me. On reflection I wonder if she is subconsciously referencing Kasimir Malevich's Black Square painting (?) (although this is an oblong) and so this is the 'Stolen Thunder' perhaps. I know a year or so ago she did a similar print, obviously numbered 799 and therefore I'm assuming thats what the '(once removed)' in the title refers to. But also has the thunder been stolen because its an edition, reproduced and sold over and over again? It almost becomes a strange sort of interactive, participation piece, not complete until the buyers purchase and add their red dots as the edition is sold. Is it a reference to modern multiples? Those were/are my thoughts about the piece. But then again I'm a thick Yorkshire oik and here is what Parker's gallery, Firth Street Gallery said about her 2013 piece: 'For this work, Cornelia Parker visited the 2012 Royal Academy Summer Exhibition and took a clandestine photo of one of the most successful prints in the show. It was (as is traditional at the RA) plastered in red dots to mark the sales. A rush of covetousness came over her. Not able to make a representational image that might accrue such sales, Parker resorted to abstraction. Digitally erasing the image that she had stolen, Parker exhibited the photograph of the print as her own work in the 2013 RA Summer show, retaining the red spots as part of the piece in the hope of accruing some of her own sales by a Pavlovian response from the audience.' So I was kinda talking b**locks :-) but it sounded good and I had a go. I'll definitely be adding the red dots to my framed piece.
It's fascinating. But I still haven't worked out the various parts of the artwork; I will do my own research as I'm intrigued. I love conceptual art like this. Thank you for sharing it.
Thank you. I need to research what I'm looking at there. I need to understand it. Well coach, I had to buy it, I just stood there and was like, wow, it really resonated to me. On reflection I wonder if she is subconsciously referencing Kasimir Malevich's Black Square painting (?) (although this is an oblong) and so this is the 'Stolen Thunder' perhaps. I know a year or so ago she did a similar print, obviously numbered 799 and therefore I'm assuming thats what the '(once removed)' in the title refers to. But also has the thunder been stolen because its an edition, reproduced and sold over and over again? It almost becomes a strange sort of interactive, participation piece, not complete until the buyers purchase and add their red dots as the edition is sold. Is it a reference to modern multiples? Those were/are my thoughts about the piece. But then again I'm a thick Yorkshire oik and here is what Parker's gallery, Firth Street Gallery said about her 2013 piece: 'For this work, Cornelia Parker visited the 2012 Royal Academy Summer Exhibition and took a clandestine photo of one of the most successful prints in the show. It was (as is traditional at the RA) plastered in red dots to mark the sales. A rush of covetousness came over her. Not able to make a representational image that might accrue such sales, Parker resorted to abstraction. Digitally erasing the image that she had stolen, Parker exhibited the photograph of the print as her own work in the 2013 RA Summer show, retaining the red spots as part of the piece in the hope of accruing some of her own sales by a Pavlovian response from the audience.' So I was kinda talking b**locks :-) but it sounded good and I had a go. I'll definitely be adding the red dots to my framed piece. It's fascinating. But I still haven't worked out the various parts of the artwork; I will do my own research as I'm intrigued. I love conceptual art like this. Thank you for sharing it. |
|
|
|
mose
New Member
π¨οΈ 410
ππ» 424
May 2017
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by mose on Jul 23, 2017 0:15:42 GMT 1, Or if your tastes run a bit more violent in porn reclaim, Darja Bajagic does powerful work.
Or if your tastes run a bit more violent in porn reclaim, Darja Bajagic does powerful work.
|
|
k2
New Member
π¨οΈ 528
ππ» 972
November 2016
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by k2 on Jul 23, 2017 0:24:40 GMT 1, Not necessarily my favourite female artist, but I'm particularly drawn to Rhoda K Baker's 3D paperscapes - www.rhodakbaker.co.uk/paperscapes - I find them strangely affecting in person.
Not necessarily my favourite female artist, but I'm particularly drawn to Rhoda K Baker's 3D paperscapes - www.rhodakbaker.co.uk/paperscapes - I find them strangely affecting in person. |
|
|
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by Deleted on Jul 23, 2017 0:47:06 GMT 1, I'd say Martha Cooper is an artist.
|
|
nobokov
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 4,948
ππ» 6,901
February 2016
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by nobokov on Jul 23, 2017 1:36:18 GMT 1, I'd say Martha Cooper is an artist.
I'd say Martha Cooper is an artist. Agree to disagree |
|
cmartin
New Member
π¨οΈ 50
ππ» 28
June 2017
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by cmartin on Jul 23, 2017 1:41:14 GMT 1, Hueman
Hueman
|
|
|
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by Coach on Jul 23, 2017 1:44:37 GMT 1, I'd say Martha Cooper is an artist. Agree to disagree
I think you might be in the minority, my friend.
Her photographs are works of art in thier own right, in my opinion.
She doesn't only document what she sees. Her photos are so well composed that they have their own artistic merit.
I'd say Martha Cooper is an artist. Agree to disagree I think you might be in the minority, my friend. Her photographs are works of art in thier own right, in my opinion. She doesn't only document what she sees. Her photos are so well composed that they have their own artistic merit. |
|
cyberkid
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 2,375
ππ» 2,458
January 2015
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by cyberkid on Jul 23, 2017 7:07:08 GMT 1, Mando Marie (usa)
Mad C (germany)
Hyuro (argentina)
Mando Marie (usa)
Mad C (germany)
Hyuro (argentina)
|
|
Winks
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 2,802
ππ» 3,603
April 2016
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by Winks on Jul 23, 2017 7:57:59 GMT 1, Definitely Candice Tripp and Annatomix for me.
http://instagram.com/p/BQ2z56Qgayw
|
|
|
|
.dappy
Full Member
π¨οΈ 9,841
ππ» 9,462
December 2010
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by .dappy on Jul 23, 2017 8:30:04 GMT 1, ... I do like Susie Hamilton quite a lot ... simple and bold brush strokes of people and places, but saying a lot ...
... I do like Susie Hamilton quite a lot ... simple and bold brush strokes of people and places, but saying a lot ...
|
|
|
|
Winter
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 7,155
ππ» 4,461
March 2007
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by Winter on Jul 23, 2017 8:43:15 GMT 1, That Grayson Perry woman's pretty good π
That Grayson Perry woman's pretty good π
|
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by Deleted on Jul 23, 2017 8:53:14 GMT 1, Should we really be discussing the sex of an artist in 2017? Could it be less important..
Should we really be discussing the sex of an artist in 2017? Could it be less important..
|
|
J0NNY
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 1,054
ππ» 705
December 2014
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by J0NNY on Jul 23, 2017 9:03:58 GMT 1, Should we really be discussing the sex of an artist in 2017? Could it be less important..
Sorry. Back to discussing drop prices it is then
Should we really be discussing the sex of an artist in 2017? Could it be less important.. Sorry. Back to discussing drop prices it is then |
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by Deleted on Jul 23, 2017 9:20:08 GMT 1, Should we really be discussing the sex of an artist in 2017? Could it be less important.. Sorry. Back to discussing drop prices it is then
Don't actually know what drop prices even means in this context but back to my point... nobody buys art based on the sex of the artist so this whole thread is meaningless nonsense
Should we really be discussing the sex of an artist in 2017? Could it be less important.. Sorry. Back to discussing drop prices it is then Don't actually know what drop prices even means in this context but back to my point... nobody buys art based on the sex of the artist so this whole thread is meaningless nonsense |
|
.dappy
Full Member
π¨οΈ 9,841
ππ» 9,462
December 2010
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by .dappy on Jul 23, 2017 9:37:56 GMT 1, ... we are not judging art by the gender who produced it ... if you don't understand that, then that's OK ...
... but there is no need to have a go, just because you don't understand something ...
... we are not judging art by the gender who produced it ... if you don't understand that, then that's OK ...
... but there is no need to have a go, just because you don't understand something ...
|
|
|
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by Lroy on Jul 23, 2017 9:39:23 GMT 1, Should we really be discussing the sex of an artist in 2017? Could it be less important..
thats what asked some smart members one or 2 years ( episodically it comes back ) here ?!
Well, who is the best kid street-artist now ?
Should we really be discussing the sex of an artist in 2017? Could it be less important.. thats what asked some smart members one or 2 years ( episodically it comes back ) here ?! Well, who is the best kid street-artist now ? |
|
|
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by Lroy on Jul 23, 2017 9:42:09 GMT 1, Should we really be discussing the sex of an artist in 2017? Could it be less important.. Sorry. Back to discussing drop prices it is then
but yes, I agree with you to :-)
Too many trade, buy, sell, value, auction, etc etc ..
I wonder if sometimes we are not at Wall-Streetart , here ?!
Should we really be discussing the sex of an artist in 2017? Could it be less important.. Sorry. Back to discussing drop prices it is then but yes, I agree with you to :-) Too many trade, buy, sell, value, auction, etc etc .. I wonder if sometimes we are not at Wall-Streetart , here ?! |
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by Deleted on Jul 23, 2017 10:08:04 GMT 1, Sorry. Back to discussing drop prices it is then but yes, I agree with you to :-) Too many trade, buy, sell, value, auction, etc etc .. I wonder if sometimes we are not at Wall-Streetart , here ?!
How on earth is that relevant or justification for dividing artists by sex?
Sorry. Back to discussing drop prices it is then but yes, I agree with you to :-) Too many trade, buy, sell, value, auction, etc etc .. I wonder if sometimes we are not at Wall-Streetart , here ?! [ How on earth is that relevant or justification for dividing artists by sex? |
|
|
|
rjf76
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 2,494
ππ» 2,662
January 2015
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by rjf76 on Jul 23, 2017 10:14:18 GMT 1, Should we really be discussing the sex of an artist in 2017? Could it be less important..
It's not about discussing the sex - it's about heroing, celebrating, creating awareness and actually just opening up new artists, female in this case, to others on this board.
Street/Urban Art (and all categories for that matter!) is still a very male dominated culture...
My personal favs are:
Annatomix
Tara McPherson
Martha Cooper - photography is an art form in every way!
Should we really be discussing the sex of an artist in 2017? Could it be less important.. It's not about discussing the sex - it's about heroing, celebrating, creating awareness and actually just opening up new artists, female in this case, to others on this board. Street/Urban Art (and all categories for that matter!) is still a very male dominated culture... My personal favs are: Annatomix Tara McPherson Martha Cooper - photography is an art form in every way! |
|
|
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by Lroy on Jul 23, 2017 10:19:06 GMT 1, but yes, I agree with you to :-) Too many trade, buy, sell, value, auction, etc etc .. I wonder if sometimes we are not at Wall-Streetart , here ?! [ How on earth is that relevant or justification for dividing artists by sex?
yes I agree with you too.
but yes, I agree with you to :-) Too many trade, buy, sell, value, auction, etc etc .. I wonder if sometimes we are not at Wall-Streetart , here ?! [ How on earth is that relevant or justification for dividing artists by sex? yes I agree with you too. |
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by Deleted on Jul 23, 2017 10:19:38 GMT 1, Should we really be discussing the sex of an artist in 2017? Could it be less important.. It's not about discussing the sex - it's about heroing, celebrating, creating awareness and actually just opening up new artists, female in this case, to others on this board. Street/Urban Art (and all categories for that matter!) is still a very male dominated culture... My personal favs are: Annatomix Tara McPherson Martha Cooper - photography is an art form in every way!
There you go.. you are listing females as if they need more support and help than male artists. Sorry but this is just nonsense. Women don't need heroing or celebrating more than men.. if they are good they are successful... dislike
Should we really be discussing the sex of an artist in 2017? Could it be less important.. It's not about discussing the sex - it's about heroing, celebrating, creating awareness and actually just opening up new artists, female in this case, to others on this board. Street/Urban Art (and all categories for that matter!) is still a very male dominated culture... My personal favs are: Annatomix Tara McPherson Martha Cooper - photography is an art form in every way! [br There you go.. you are listing females as if they need more support and help than male artists. Sorry but this is just nonsense. Women don't need heroing or celebrating more than men.. if they are good they are successful... dislike |
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by Deleted on Jul 23, 2017 10:21:09 GMT 1, Where is the favourite male artist page? Oh that's right... not needed. Yawn
Where is the favourite male artist page? Oh that's right... not needed. Yawn
|
|
rjf76
Junior Member
π¨οΈ 2,494
ππ» 2,662
January 2015
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by rjf76 on Jul 23, 2017 10:25:48 GMT 1, It's not about discussing the sex - it's about heroing, celebrating, creating awareness and actually just opening up new artists, female in this case, to others on this board. Street/Urban Art (and all categories for that matter!) is still a very male dominated culture... My personal favs are: Annatomix Tara McPherson Martha Cooper - photography is an art form in every way! [br There you go.. you are listing females as if they need more support and help than male artists. Sorry but this is just nonsense. Women don't need heroing or celebrating more than men.. if they are good they are successful... dislike
Missing the point again.
No it doesn't matter if you love art made by a male or female but that wasn't the point of this thread. It was simply name your top 3 female artists. You wouldn't have commented if it was name your top 3 male artists - you would have just typed away with Invader, Pejac and Harland Miller...
It's not about discussing the sex - it's about heroing, celebrating, creating awareness and actually just opening up new artists, female in this case, to others on this board. Street/Urban Art (and all categories for that matter!) is still a very male dominated culture... My personal favs are: Annatomix Tara McPherson Martha Cooper - photography is an art form in every way! [br There you go.. you are listing females as if they need more support and help than male artists. Sorry but this is just nonsense. Women don't need heroing or celebrating more than men.. if they are good they are successful... dislike Missing the point again. No it doesn't matter if you love art made by a male or female but that wasn't the point of this thread. It was simply name your top 3 female artists. You wouldn't have commented if it was name your top 3 male artists - you would have just typed away with Invader, Pejac and Harland Miller... |
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by Deleted on Jul 23, 2017 10:26:23 GMT 1, ... we are not judging art by the gender who produced it ... if you don't understand that, then that's OK ... ... but there is no need to have a go, just because you don't understand something ...
Yes you are . You are specifically stating list good female artists. There is no who's your favourite male artist page is there??
I translate this 'quite rightly' too read - the women need some help let's give them a push. It's underhanded and probably unintentional sexism.
Whether or not you agree with that is irrelevant to me. It's black and white
... we are not judging art by the gender who produced it ... if you don't understand that, then that's OK ... ... but there is no need to have a go, just because you don't understand something ... Yes you are . You are specifically stating list good female artists. There is no who's your favourite male artist page is there?? I translate this 'quite rightly' too read - the women need some help let's give them a push. It's underhanded and probably unintentional sexism. Whether or not you agree with that is irrelevant to me. It's black and white |
|
.dappy
Full Member
π¨οΈ 9,841
ππ» 9,462
December 2010
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by .dappy on Jul 23, 2017 10:30:19 GMT 1, ... unintentional sexism ... Ha!Ha!
... are you a vegan too?
... unintentional sexism ... Ha!Ha!
... are you a vegan too?
|
|
Deleted
π¨οΈ 0
ππ»
January 1970
|
The-Art-Form Magazine π, by Deleted on Jul 23, 2017 10:30:51 GMT 1, ... unintentional sexism ... Ha!Ha! ... are you a vegan too?
No I'm just not sexist
... unintentional sexism ... Ha!Ha! ... are you a vegan too? No I'm just not sexist |
|
