|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by King Robbo Lives on Sept 21, 2017 20:41:20 GMT 1, It only serves as some kind of one upmanship to forum members... I know something you don't know attitude.
I don't think that anyone here is claiming to "know" who B is. I think it's a curious circumstance and there seems to be a lot more pressure NOT to reveal his identity, which is odd to me in it's own right. I know a lot of people are invested in B, but to just accuse others of one upsmanship for having a conversation seems a bit negative and unnecessary.
It only serves as some kind of one upmanship to forum members... I know something you don't know attitude. I don't think that anyone here is claiming to "know" who B is. I think it's a curious circumstance and there seems to be a lot more pressure NOT to reveal his identity, which is odd to me in it's own right. I know a lot of people are invested in B, but to just accuse others of one upsmanship for having a conversation seems a bit negative and unnecessary.
|
|
iamzero
Full Member
Posts • 9,190
Likes • 8,542
May 2011
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by iamzero on Sept 21, 2017 20:45:36 GMT 1, I think you've taken it as a derogatory comment towards forum members which wasn't the intention.
I think you've taken it as a derogatory comment towards forum members which wasn't the intention.
|
|
jimbofatz
New Member
Posts • 705
Likes • 362
June 2017
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by jimbofatz on Sept 21, 2017 22:49:01 GMT 1, The original shares belonged to Jaime Hewlett artist who is also a founding member of musical act Gorillaz. The singer character in the band Gorillaz is called 2D (based on an unknown friend who's only other career option was vandal-- Fans of the band have always guessed it was based on 3D). Damon from blur does the voice of the 2D character in Gorillaz. At one point Damon noted that Banksy convinced gorillaz to stick together. Banksy's work appeared notably in early Gorillaz videos and of course Banksy did the blur Think Tank album cover.
Given the amount of information out there pointing to Del Naja's major involvement and knowing that if Banksy did artwork under a previous name especially as Del Naja how much more interesting his story gets - I think a lot of people will regret ignoring all of this talk.
So lets help each other out a little bit and if you're one of those people who 100% claims to know otherwise speak up with something more than "people have told me differently".
Otherwise don't knock people who are piecing together what is easily the most interesting artistic career of our time. Because you know you'll be first in line to buy all the books and movies when they are released in a few years.
The original shares belonged to Jaime Hewlett artist who is also a founding member of musical act Gorillaz. The singer character in the band Gorillaz is called 2D (based on an unknown friend who's only other career option was vandal-- Fans of the band have always guessed it was based on 3D). Damon from blur does the voice of the 2D character in Gorillaz. At one point Damon noted that Banksy convinced gorillaz to stick together. Banksy's work appeared notably in early Gorillaz videos and of course Banksy did the blur Think Tank album cover.
Given the amount of information out there pointing to Del Naja's major involvement and knowing that if Banksy did artwork under a previous name especially as Del Naja how much more interesting his story gets - I think a lot of people will regret ignoring all of this talk.
So lets help each other out a little bit and if you're one of those people who 100% claims to know otherwise speak up with something more than "people have told me differently".
Otherwise don't knock people who are piecing together what is easily the most interesting artistic career of our time. Because you know you'll be first in line to buy all the books and movies when they are released in a few years.
|
|
detail
New Member
Posts • 89
Likes • 86
November 2016
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by detail on Sept 22, 2017 1:22:43 GMT 1, I could be wrong, but I always thought Damon did the voice for 2D. If so, surely that would mean he is 2D given the Gorillaz are a virtual band?
Either way, doesn't really matter, never did no harm... never did no harm lol.
I could be wrong, but I always thought Damon did the voice for 2D. If so, surely that would mean he is 2D given the Gorillaz are a virtual band?
Either way, doesn't really matter, never did no harm... never did no harm lol.
|
|
.dappy
Full Member
Posts • 9,836
Likes • 9,445
December 2010
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by .dappy on Sept 22, 2017 1:23:20 GMT 1, ... so Damon Albarn is Bansky ... I get it ... it all makes sense now ... thank you 👍
... and yes Damon was the main vocalist
... so Damon Albarn is Bansky ... I get it ... it all makes sense now ... thank you 👍
... and yes Damon was the main vocalist
|
|
jimbofatz
New Member
Posts • 705
Likes • 362
June 2017
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by jimbofatz on Sept 22, 2017 2:32:52 GMT 1, ... so Damon Albarn is Bansky ... I get it ... it all makes sense now ... thank you 👍 ... and yes Damon was the main vocalist
Thanks for bumping this thread back up to the top of the board happy
... so Damon Albarn is Bansky ... I get it ... it all makes sense now ... thank you 👍 ... and yes Damon was the main vocalist Thanks for bumping this thread back up to the top of the board happy
|
|
|
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by Coach on Sept 22, 2017 12:15:41 GMT 1, The original shares belonged to Jaime Hewlett artist who is also a founding member of musical act Gorillaz. The singer character in the band Gorillaz is called 2D (based on an unknown friend who's only other career option was vandal-- Fans of the band have always guessed it was based on 3D). Damon from blur does the voice of the 2D character in Gorillaz. At one point Damon noted that Banksy convinced gorillaz to stick together. Banksy's work appeared notably in early Gorillaz videos and of course Banksy did the blur Think Tank album cover. Given the amount of information out there pointing to Del Naja's major involvement and knowing that if Banksy did artwork under a previous name especially as Del Naja how much more interesting his story gets - I think a lot of people will regret ignoring all of this talk. So lets help each other out a little bit and if you're one of those people who 100% claims to know otherwise speak up with something more than "people have told me differently". Otherwise don't knock people who are piecing together what is easily the most interesting artistic career of our time. Because you know you'll be first in line to buy all the books and movies when they are released in a few years.
First, why not respect his wish to remain anonymous? Why the need to "out" him? Second, anyone that has met Banksy or has any real information, rather than the speculation and guess work on this thread, is undoubtedly not going to make that public out of respect for the artist's wish to remain anonymous.
The original shares belonged to Jaime Hewlett artist who is also a founding member of musical act Gorillaz. The singer character in the band Gorillaz is called 2D (based on an unknown friend who's only other career option was vandal-- Fans of the band have always guessed it was based on 3D). Damon from blur does the voice of the 2D character in Gorillaz. At one point Damon noted that Banksy convinced gorillaz to stick together. Banksy's work appeared notably in early Gorillaz videos and of course Banksy did the blur Think Tank album cover. Given the amount of information out there pointing to Del Naja's major involvement and knowing that if Banksy did artwork under a previous name especially as Del Naja how much more interesting his story gets - I think a lot of people will regret ignoring all of this talk. So lets help each other out a little bit and if you're one of those people who 100% claims to know otherwise speak up with something more than "people have told me differently". Otherwise don't knock people who are piecing together what is easily the most interesting artistic career of our time. Because you know you'll be first in line to buy all the books and movies when they are released in a few years. First, why not respect his wish to remain anonymous? Why the need to "out" him? Second, anyone that has met Banksy or has any real information, rather than the speculation and guess work on this thread, is undoubtedly not going to make that public out of respect for the artist's wish to remain anonymous.
|
|
jimbofatz
New Member
Posts • 705
Likes • 362
June 2017
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by jimbofatz on Sept 22, 2017 13:20:17 GMT 1, First, why not respect his wish to remain anonymous? Why the need to "out" him? Second, anyone that has met Banksy or has any real information, rather than the speculation and guess work on this thread, is undoubtedly not going to make that public out of respect for the artist's wish to remain anonymous. I believe it's interesting to create a list and history of people who have worked with Banksy/been apart of all this. You can learn more about any artist by taking the time to research their influences/collaborators/causes they support. I always look into all my favorite artists and their influences it's what keeps things fresh. Right now information is tight not because people are so great at keeping secrets but because of how intertwined and international he is-- which makes the research even more rewarding. I don't feel the need to sit and wait to read the book in ten years to find out more about him.
My main reason for "outting" him is its nice for people who don't have thousands of pounds on this forum to be able to make smart purchases now with little money and build a collection that will be historically significant.
I think you under estimate the knowledge on this board and using the forums knowledge as a resource is what it's all about. No one has to post anything they aren't comfortable with. At the same time I think you over estimate the reach of this board. The police are not monitoring this board for hot tips.
Anyway, they just plexiglassed his latest work, he builds hotels and amusement parks. I think he's in the clear
First, why not respect his wish to remain anonymous? Why the need to "out" him? Second, anyone that has met Banksy or has any real information, rather than the speculation and guess work on this thread, is undoubtedly not going to make that public out of respect for the artist's wish to remain anonymous. I believe it's interesting to create a list and history of people who have worked with Banksy/been apart of all this. You can learn more about any artist by taking the time to research their influences/collaborators/causes they support. I always look into all my favorite artists and their influences it's what keeps things fresh. Right now information is tight not because people are so great at keeping secrets but because of how intertwined and international he is-- which makes the research even more rewarding. I don't feel the need to sit and wait to read the book in ten years to find out more about him. My main reason for "outting" him is its nice for people who don't have thousands of pounds on this forum to be able to make smart purchases now with little money and build a collection that will be historically significant. I think you under estimate the knowledge on this board and using the forums knowledge as a resource is what it's all about. No one has to post anything they aren't comfortable with. At the same time I think you over estimate the reach of this board. The police are not monitoring this board for hot tips. Anyway, they just plexiglassed his latest work, he builds hotels and amusement parks. I think he's in the clear
|
|
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by Coach on Sept 22, 2017 14:03:25 GMT 1, First, why not respect his wish to remain anonymous? Why the need to "out" him? Second, anyone that has met Banksy or has any real information, rather than the speculation and guess work on this thread, is undoubtedly not going to make that public out of respect for the artist's wish to remain anonymous. I believe it's interesting to create a list and history of people who have worked with Banksy/been apart of all this. You can learn more about any artist by taking the time to research their influences/collaborators/causes they support. I always look into all my favorite artists and their influences it's what keeps things fresh. Right now information is tight not because people are so great at keeping secrets but because of how intertwined and international he is-- which makes the research even more rewarding. I don't feel the need to sit and wait to read the book in ten years to find out more about him. My main reason for "outting" him is its nice for people who don't have thousands of pounds on this forum to be able to make smart purchases now with little money and build a collection that will be historically significant. I think you under estimate the knowledge on this board and using the forums knowledge as a resource is what it's all about. No one has to post anything they aren't comfortable with. At the same time I think you over estimate the reach of this board. The police are not monitoring this board for hot tips. Anyway, they just plexiglassed his latest work, he builds hotels and amusement parks. I think he's in the clear
I don't follow the second paragraph of your reply. Are you suggesting that outing him will devalue his work, and that that's a good thing because people can then afford it?
First, why not respect his wish to remain anonymous? Why the need to "out" him? Second, anyone that has met Banksy or has any real information, rather than the speculation and guess work on this thread, is undoubtedly not going to make that public out of respect for the artist's wish to remain anonymous. I believe it's interesting to create a list and history of people who have worked with Banksy/been apart of all this. You can learn more about any artist by taking the time to research their influences/collaborators/causes they support. I always look into all my favorite artists and their influences it's what keeps things fresh. Right now information is tight not because people are so great at keeping secrets but because of how intertwined and international he is-- which makes the research even more rewarding. I don't feel the need to sit and wait to read the book in ten years to find out more about him. My main reason for "outting" him is its nice for people who don't have thousands of pounds on this forum to be able to make smart purchases now with little money and build a collection that will be historically significant. I think you under estimate the knowledge on this board and using the forums knowledge as a resource is what it's all about. No one has to post anything they aren't comfortable with. At the same time I think you over estimate the reach of this board. The police are not monitoring this board for hot tips. Anyway, they just plexiglassed his latest work, he builds hotels and amusement parks. I think he's in the clear I don't follow the second paragraph of your reply. Are you suggesting that outing him will devalue his work, and that that's a good thing because people can then afford it?
|
|
detail
New Member
Posts • 89
Likes • 86
November 2016
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by detail on Sept 22, 2017 14:14:35 GMT 1, Its a bit of a stretch to call some basic information about the UK music scence in the 90's/00's research. Most people already know all this stuff and none of it proves who Banksy is/isn't.
Its a bit of a stretch to call some basic information about the UK music scence in the 90's/00's research. Most people already know all this stuff and none of it proves who Banksy is/isn't.
|
|
jimbofatz
New Member
Posts • 705
Likes • 362
June 2017
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by jimbofatz on Sept 22, 2017 14:20:43 GMT 1, My main reason for "outting" him is its nice for people who don't have thousands of pounds on this forum to be able to make smart purchases now with little money and build a collection that will be historically significant. I don't follow the second paragraph of your reply. Are you suggesting that outing him will devalue his work, and that that's a good thing because people can then afford it? I'm suggesting that if you want to invest in "Banksy"/love his work the window to do so affordably (under 100 pounds) is still out there today through other artists.
I am not trying to devalue Banksy's. In fact, I think his values are set in stone. Im suggesting that when this is all revealed I'd rather board members have the jump on who's been involved with the Banksy project in advance. Because the day the book/movie drops flippers are going to buy up everything even remotely linked to Banksy. So why not share information now and make sure the art ends up in the right hands.
Its not even about hitting the target dead on and revealing his name. It's about gathering up a list of people who are legitimately connected to him. In the same way as you would follow Matisse to Picasso. Both would be very smart purchases today made 100 years ago. It's about exploring and enjoying other artists and maybe falling into something along the way.
My main reason for "outting" him is its nice for people who don't have thousands of pounds on this forum to be able to make smart purchases now with little money and build a collection that will be historically significant. I don't follow the second paragraph of your reply. Are you suggesting that outing him will devalue his work, and that that's a good thing because people can then afford it? I'm suggesting that if you want to invest in "Banksy"/love his work the window to do so affordably (under 100 pounds) is still out there today through other artists. I am not trying to devalue Banksy's. In fact, I think his values are set in stone. Im suggesting that when this is all revealed I'd rather board members have the jump on who's been involved with the Banksy project in advance. Because the day the book/movie drops flippers are going to buy up everything even remotely linked to Banksy. So why not share information now and make sure the art ends up in the right hands. Its not even about hitting the target dead on and revealing his name. It's about gathering up a list of people who are legitimately connected to him. In the same way as you would follow Matisse to Picasso. Both would be very smart purchases today made 100 years ago. It's about exploring and enjoying other artists and maybe falling into something along the way.
|
|
chainsaw
New Member
Posts • 130
Likes • 72
June 2017
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by chainsaw on Sept 22, 2017 14:24:31 GMT 1,
probably this
if you like the art buy it for arts sake, not so you can flip.
probably this
if you like the art buy it for arts sake, not so you can flip.
|
|
jimbofatz
New Member
Posts • 705
Likes • 362
June 2017
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by jimbofatz on Sept 22, 2017 14:30:21 GMT 1, probably this if you like the art buy it for arts sake, not so you can flip. Some flipper would get an advanced copy any movie/book and that shit would be "copped" before you even woke up. It's just the way this entire scene functions it's gross and sorting this out now on an art forum is a much more respectable way to handle it.
probably this if you like the art buy it for arts sake, not so you can flip. Some flipper would get an advanced copy any movie/book and that shit would be "copped" before you even woke up. It's just the way this entire scene functions it's gross and sorting this out now on an art forum is a much more respectable way to handle it.
|
|
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by Coach on Sept 22, 2017 14:54:37 GMT 1, I don't follow the second paragraph of your reply. Are you suggesting that outing him will devalue his work, and that that's a good thing because people can then afford it? I'm suggesting that if you want to invest in "Banksy"/love his work the window to do so affordably (under 100 pounds) is still out there today through other artists. I am not trying to devalue Banksy's. In fact, I think his values are set in stone. Im suggesting that when this is all revealed I'd rather board members have the jump on who's been involved with the Banksy project in advance. Because the day the book/movie drops flippers are going to buy up everything even remotely linked to Banksy. So why not share information now and make sure the art ends up in the right hands. Its not even about hitting the target dead on and revealing his name. It's about gathering up a list of people who are legitimately connected to him. In the same way as you would follow Matisse to Picasso. Both would be very smart purchases today made 100 years ago. It's about exploring and enjoying other artists and maybe falling into something along the way.
I see. I still think what you are doing is wrong, but accept I won't persuade you.
I don't follow the second paragraph of your reply. Are you suggesting that outing him will devalue his work, and that that's a good thing because people can then afford it? I'm suggesting that if you want to invest in "Banksy"/love his work the window to do so affordably (under 100 pounds) is still out there today through other artists. I am not trying to devalue Banksy's. In fact, I think his values are set in stone. Im suggesting that when this is all revealed I'd rather board members have the jump on who's been involved with the Banksy project in advance. Because the day the book/movie drops flippers are going to buy up everything even remotely linked to Banksy. So why not share information now and make sure the art ends up in the right hands. Its not even about hitting the target dead on and revealing his name. It's about gathering up a list of people who are legitimately connected to him. In the same way as you would follow Matisse to Picasso. Both would be very smart purchases today made 100 years ago. It's about exploring and enjoying other artists and maybe falling into something along the way. I see. I still think what you are doing is wrong, but accept I won't persuade you.
|
|
|
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by Rouen Cathedral on Sept 22, 2017 15:03:23 GMT 1, What would happen if banksys identity was confirmed? Why the anonymity?
What would happen if banksys identity was confirmed? Why the anonymity?
|
|
Unica
Junior Member
Posts • 2,058
Likes • 1,220
November 2013
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by Unica on Sept 22, 2017 15:06:59 GMT 1, What would happen if banksys identity was confirmed? Why the anonymity? Have a think about it.
I'll help you out. Its illegal to paint on private property.
Why aren't you clamoring to know Invaders identity? I bet you were F5 frantically for his releases.
What would happen if banksys identity was confirmed? Why the anonymity? Have a think about it. I'll help you out. Its illegal to paint on private property. Why aren't you clamoring to know Invaders identity? I bet you were F5 frantically for his releases.
|
|
moron
Junior Member
Posts • 2,711
Likes • 1,050
September 2017
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by moron on Sept 22, 2017 15:07:55 GMT 1, If Banksy wanted to be anonymous. He wouldn't need a PR team and tell the world he made the graffiti art on the wall/s.
It comes with the territory seeking fame and achieving of.
Considering there are flippers dealers out there who know who and what Banksy is and the fact that these money motivated people have not bought up Robert Del Naja prints as a sure fire investment points to Banksy being a Robert but not Del Naja. The recent buying spree of Del Naja prints could be nothing more than the old flippers game buying the prints up of planting the thought in peoples minds that Del Naja is 99.9999% Banksy, shoving one or two in an auction (online or bricks and mortar) and shill bidding the prices up, then selling their stock at a big profit to people who fall for it.
archive.boston.com/ae/theater_arts/gallery/banksy/
and they all lived happily ever after
If Banksy wanted to be anonymous. He wouldn't need a PR team and tell the world he made the graffiti art on the wall/s. It comes with the territory seeking fame and achieving of. Considering there are flippers dealers out there who know who and what Banksy is and the fact that these money motivated people have not bought up Robert Del Naja prints as a sure fire investment points to Banksy being a Robert but not Del Naja. The recent buying spree of Del Naja prints could be nothing more than the old flippers game buying the prints up of planting the thought in peoples minds that Del Naja is 99.9999% Banksy, shoving one or two in an auction (online or bricks and mortar) and shill bidding the prices up, then selling their stock at a big profit to people who fall for it. archive.boston.com/ae/theater_arts/gallery/banksy/ and they all lived happily ever after
|
|
moron
Junior Member
Posts • 2,711
Likes • 1,050
September 2017
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by moron on Sept 22, 2017 15:09:05 GMT 1, What would happen if banksys identity was confirmed? Why the anonymity? Nothing
What would happen if banksys identity was confirmed? Why the anonymity? Nothing
|
|
Unica
Junior Member
Posts • 2,058
Likes • 1,220
November 2013
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by Unica on Sept 22, 2017 15:11:06 GMT 1, Lets face it if Banksy was 3D, do you really think POW and LAZ would be selling his prints for a few hundred quid.
Lets face it if Banksy was 3D, do you really think POW and LAZ would be selling his prints for a few hundred quid.
|
|
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by Rouen Cathedral on Sept 22, 2017 15:16:30 GMT 1, What would happen if banksys identity was confirmed? Why the anonymity? Have a think about it. I'll help you out. Its illegal to paint on private property. Why aren't you clamoring to know Invaders identity? I bet you were F5 frantically for his releases.
Yet when he paints on the walls illegally they go at great effort to protect it. Doesn't make sense really.
And no I wasn't f5 ing.
What would happen if banksys identity was confirmed? Why the anonymity? Have a think about it. I'll help you out. Its illegal to paint on private property. Why aren't you clamoring to know Invaders identity? I bet you were F5 frantically for his releases. Yet when he paints on the walls illegally they go at great effort to protect it. Doesn't make sense really. And no I wasn't f5 ing.
|
|
moron
Junior Member
Posts • 2,711
Likes • 1,050
September 2017
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by moron on Sept 22, 2017 15:21:45 GMT 1, Have a think about it. I'll help you out. Its illegal to paint on private property. Why aren't you clamoring to know Invaders identity? I bet you were F5 frantically for his releases. Yet when he paints on the walls illegally they go at great effort to protect it. Doesn't make sense really. And no I wasn't f5 ing. Anonymity is a good marketing tool regarding consumers and fans. If the authorities wanted to have a word with Banksy, it would not be hard for them to find out who he is.
Have a think about it. I'll help you out. Its illegal to paint on private property. Why aren't you clamoring to know Invaders identity? I bet you were F5 frantically for his releases. Yet when he paints on the walls illegally they go at great effort to protect it. Doesn't make sense really. And no I wasn't f5 ing. Anonymity is a good marketing tool regarding consumers and fans. If the authorities wanted to have a word with Banksy, it would not be hard for them to find out who he is.
|
|
jimbofatz
New Member
Posts • 705
Likes • 362
June 2017
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by jimbofatz on Sept 22, 2017 15:25:43 GMT 1, I'm suggesting that if you want to invest in "Banksy"/love his work the window to do so affordably (under 100 pounds) is still out there today through other artists. I am not trying to devalue Banksy's. In fact, I think his values are set in stone. Im suggesting that when this is all revealed I'd rather board members have the jump on who's been involved with the Banksy project in advance. Because the day the book/movie drops flippers are going to buy up everything even remotely linked to Banksy. So why not share information now and make sure the art ends up in the right hands. Its not even about hitting the target dead on and revealing his name. It's about gathering up a list of people who are legitimately connected to him. In the same way as you would follow Matisse to Picasso. Both would be very smart purchases today made 100 years ago. It's about exploring and enjoying other artists and maybe falling into something along the way. I see. I still think what you are doing is wrong, but accept I won't persuade you. Fair enough I'll bring my spiel to the other forum.
I'm suggesting that if you want to invest in "Banksy"/love his work the window to do so affordably (under 100 pounds) is still out there today through other artists. I am not trying to devalue Banksy's. In fact, I think his values are set in stone. Im suggesting that when this is all revealed I'd rather board members have the jump on who's been involved with the Banksy project in advance. Because the day the book/movie drops flippers are going to buy up everything even remotely linked to Banksy. So why not share information now and make sure the art ends up in the right hands. Its not even about hitting the target dead on and revealing his name. It's about gathering up a list of people who are legitimately connected to him. In the same way as you would follow Matisse to Picasso. Both would be very smart purchases today made 100 years ago. It's about exploring and enjoying other artists and maybe falling into something along the way. I see. I still think what you are doing is wrong, but accept I won't persuade you. Fair enough I'll bring my spiel to the other forum.
|
|
|
moron
Junior Member
Posts • 2,711
Likes • 1,050
September 2017
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by moron on Sept 22, 2017 15:31:27 GMT 1, The irony indeed. According to some. People should not try to find out who Banksy is because he has committed criminal acts.
The irony indeed. According to some. People should not try to find out who Banksy is because he has committed criminal acts.
|
|
Unica
Junior Member
Posts • 2,058
Likes • 1,220
November 2013
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by Unica on Sept 22, 2017 15:47:13 GMT 1, Have a think about it. I'll help you out. Its illegal to paint on private property. Why aren't you clamoring to know Invaders identity? I bet you were F5 frantically for his releases. Yet when he paints on the walls illegally they go at great effort to protect it. Doesn't make sense really. And no I wasn't f5 ing. What about Invader, do you think he should reveal himself? Would that make more sense?
Have a think about it. I'll help you out. Its illegal to paint on private property. Why aren't you clamoring to know Invaders identity? I bet you were F5 frantically for his releases. Yet when he paints on the walls illegally they go at great effort to protect it. Doesn't make sense really. And no I wasn't f5 ing. What about Invader, do you think he should reveal himself? Would that make more sense?
|
|
moron
Junior Member
Posts • 2,711
Likes • 1,050
September 2017
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by moron on Sept 22, 2017 15:55:04 GMT 1, Yet when he paints on the walls illegally they go at great effort to protect it. Doesn't make sense really. And no I wasn't f5 ing. What about Invader, do you think he should reveal himself? Would that make more sense? The police know who invader is.
Yet when he paints on the walls illegally they go at great effort to protect it. Doesn't make sense really. And no I wasn't f5 ing. What about Invader, do you think he should reveal himself? Would that make more sense? The police know who invader is.
|
|
willamsa
New Member
Posts • 150
Likes • 33
May 2006
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by willamsa on Sept 22, 2017 18:40:53 GMT 1, Hold on it makes sense
. . . . 3D is actually invader not Banksy
Hold on it makes sense
. . . . 3D is actually invader not Banksy
|
|
Shoot Again
Junior Member
Posts • 5,522
Likes • 2,695
April 2011
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by Shoot Again on Sept 26, 2017 9:54:41 GMT 1, What about Invader, do you think he should reveal himself? Would that make more sense? The police know who invader is. INVADER's (real) name is very much well know from everyone
What about Invader, do you think he should reveal himself? Would that make more sense? The police know who invader is. INVADER's (real) name is very much well know from everyone
|
|
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by Lroy on Sept 26, 2017 10:22:59 GMT 1, Yet when he paints on the walls illegally they go at great effort to protect it. Doesn't make sense really. And no I wasn't f5 ing. What about Invader, do you think he should reveal himself? Would that make more sense? Erm... Identity of Invader is known since years ! They even gave his name twice ( etc.. ) in a magazine for an interview ( I wont put the link , ahah ) , 10 years ago, etc etc... For the pics , same thing, easy to find his visage in google pics.. One is even scandalous, because it was taken during ... ( I wont say more )
In Paris, in his area everybody known Invader and his scooter of legend ;-) Anyway, just saying that, because knowing an identity or a face do not mean nothing and is really not important, nor interesting at all, believe me, we don't care.
Banksy ? There is more complexity, as the PR is very strong, united, powerful and great. Just to tell you that there was several periods, and that, in fact, Banksy is a brand now. very well played by the official or unofficial Pr and/or artist( s ) Making confusion at his best ! ;-) Even people wanted to know since decades are fed up and, now, are just enjoying the pieces under the name of BANKSY, LEGEND ! HE IS A LEGEND !!!
Yet when he paints on the walls illegally they go at great effort to protect it. Doesn't make sense really. And no I wasn't f5 ing. What about Invader, do you think he should reveal himself? Would that make more sense? Erm... Identity of Invader is known since years ! They even gave his name twice ( etc.. ) in a magazine for an interview ( I wont put the link , ahah ) , 10 years ago, etc etc... For the pics , same thing, easy to find his visage in google pics.. One is even scandalous, because it was taken during ... ( I wont say more ) In Paris, in his area everybody known Invader and his scooter of legend ;-) Anyway, just saying that, because knowing an identity or a face do not mean nothing and is really not important, nor interesting at all, believe me, we don't care. Banksy ? There is more complexity, as the PR is very strong, united, powerful and great. Just to tell you that there was several periods, and that, in fact, Banksy is a brand now. very well played by the official or unofficial Pr and/or artist( s ) Making confusion at his best ! ;-) Even people wanted to know since decades are fed up and, now, are just enjoying the pieces under the name of BANKSY, LEGEND ! HE IS A LEGEND !!!
|
|
jimbofatz
New Member
Posts • 705
Likes • 362
June 2017
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by jimbofatz on Sept 27, 2017 1:36:59 GMT 1, And of Course Robin G. Is the man ! Ask all Bristol ! Boring this story with Naja at the end. Had your mind changed recently haha. We'll see how Hong Kong goes.
And of Course Robin G. Is the man ! Ask all Bristol ! Boring this story with Naja at the end. Had your mind changed recently haha. We'll see how Hong Kong goes.
|
|
|
Banksy in the Daily Mail, by Lroy on Sept 27, 2017 13:29:24 GMT 1, And of Course Robin G. Is the man ! Ask all Bristol ! Boring this story with Naja at the end. Had your mind changed recently haha. We'll see how Hong Kong goes. ?! Hong-Kong why ?!! Robin was the first with Inkie etc..
And of Course Robin G. Is the man ! Ask all Bristol ! Boring this story with Naja at the end. Had your mind changed recently haha. We'll see how Hong Kong goes. ?! Hong-Kong why ?!! Robin was the first with Inkie etc..
|
|