kel
Member
Posts: 1,098
Member Since: October 2008
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by kel on Mar 3, 2016 12:54:48 GMT 1, As the white frame is only 5cm I just pulled the trigger. Order Number in the 80s. Strange it still shows available & now says -1 when you add it to basket ?
Does say sold out above the information. But very strange because if you add it to your basket it shows a figure of -£720. I doubt it is set up to issue refunds well I hope for Liverpool Biennial it isn't otherwise they could be losing money very soon.
As the white frame is only 5cm I just pulled the trigger. Order Number in the 80s. Strange it still shows available & now says -1 when you add it to basket ?
Does say sold out above the information. But very strange because if you add it to your basket it shows a figure of -£720. I doubt it is set up to issue refunds well I hope for Liverpool Biennial it isn't otherwise they could be losing money very soon.
|
|
argiebaji
Member
Posts: 2,853
Member Since: June 2008
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by argiebaji on Mar 3, 2016 13:07:15 GMT 1, ''PLEASE NOTE THIS PRODUCT IS NOW SOLD OUT. Silkscreen with high gloss varnish Somerset tube size paper 410gsm Paper: 60 x 40cm Image: 50 x 30cm Edition of 150 Signed and numbered by the artist £720.00
SOLD OUT''
I'm now pretty interested who's got the other 75..? I'm guessing CCA Galleries..?
''PLEASE NOTE THIS PRODUCT IS NOW SOLD OUT. Silkscreen with high gloss varnish Somerset tube size paper 410gsm Paper: 60 x 40cm Image: 50 x 30cm Edition of 150 Signed and numbered by the artist £720.00
SOLD OUT''
I'm now pretty interested who's got the other 75..? I'm guessing CCA Galleries..?
|
|
kel
Member
Posts: 1,098
Member Since: October 2008
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by kel on Mar 3, 2016 13:24:13 GMT 1, Now it is all down to framing. I am thinking of a standard white box frame with it float mounted. Keeping it simple.
Now it is all down to framing. I am thinking of a standard white box frame with it float mounted. Keeping it simple.
|
|
iamzero
Member
Posts: 8,487
Member Since: May 2011
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by iamzero on Mar 3, 2016 13:29:04 GMT 1, Well if CCA have the rest to sell you can bet they'll be a price hike. Not nice to deal with by all accounts.
Well if CCA have the rest to sell you can bet they'll be a price hike. Not nice to deal with by all accounts.
|
|
DashingD
Member
Posts: 120
Member Since: June 2013
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by DashingD on Mar 3, 2016 13:29:56 GMT 1, I managed to score one with an order number in the mid 70's; so if the order numbers correlate directly this could be an oversold issue. Hmmm...
I managed to score one with an order number in the mid 70's; so if the order numbers correlate directly this could be an oversold issue. Hmmm...
|
|
iamzero
Member
Posts: 8,487
Member Since: May 2011
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by iamzero on Mar 3, 2016 13:33:13 GMT 1, Biennial had odd numbers from 1 through 150 (1 to 149). I bagged n early 30's number I think?
Biennial had odd numbers from 1 through 150 (1 to 149). I bagged n early 30's number I think?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Member Since: January 1970
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by Deleted on Mar 3, 2016 13:34:59 GMT 1, And now there's a rush.... Lol
And now there's a rush.... Lol
|
|
DrWhite
Member
Posts: 4,015
Member Since: August 2012
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by DrWhite on Mar 3, 2016 13:38:19 GMT 1, Biennial had odd numbers from 1 through 150 (1 to 149). I bagged n early 30's number I think?
I think the LB0001 - LB00075 confirmation no.s on the emails refer to their print total - so reLly should have ended at LB00075 ?
Biennial had odd numbers from 1 through 150 (1 to 149). I bagged n early 30's number I think? I think the LB0001 - LB00075 confirmation no.s on the emails refer to their print total - so reLly should have ended at LB00075 ?
|
|
settingson
Member
Posts: 527
Member Since: May 2014
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by settingson on Mar 3, 2016 13:42:41 GMT 1,
Well after deliberating all day yesterday I told myself if they were still available this morning then I would bite that bullet and buy one! And guess what!!! . 
Yup.....the wallet is an awful lot lighter!! Sneaked in on the low 80's so was in minutes of missing it! Must have been fate! No regret so far! lol
Well after deliberating all day yesterday I told myself if they were still available this morning then I would bite that bullet and buy one! And guess what!!! . 
Yup.....the wallet is an awful lot lighter!! Sneaked in on the low 80's so was in minutes of missing it! Must have been fate! No regret so far! lol
|
|
pawel
Member
Posts: 2,454
Member Since: June 2015
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by pawel on Mar 3, 2016 13:44:56 GMT 1,
No regret so far! lol
No regret so far! lol
|
|
settingson
Member
Posts: 527
Member Since: May 2014
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by settingson on Mar 3, 2016 13:47:36 GMT 1, Now it is all down to framing. I am thinking of a standard white box frame with it float mounted. Keeping it simple. Framing it! Can't afford that! It's blu tac all the way! Although I do agree with your thoughts on going white and floated.
Now it is all down to framing. I am thinking of a standard white box frame with it float mounted. Keeping it simple. Framing it! Can't afford that! It's blu tac all the way! Although I do agree with your thoughts on going white and floated.
|
|
winter
Member
Posts: 6,916
Member Since: March 2007
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by winter on Mar 3, 2016 14:45:05 GMT 1, Was tempted and I decided against it, I have a few nice Blakes and don't really need another. There should really be no excuses for those who wanted but missed out!
Was tempted and I decided against it, I have a few nice Blakes and don't really need another. There should really be no excuses for those who wanted but missed out!
|
|
tomega
Member
Posts: 89
Member Since: October 2007
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by tomega on Mar 3, 2016 14:46:25 GMT 1, This is the info I was sent: Paper size is 60 x 40cm – image is 50 x 30cm. Price of the print is likely to rise! Liverpool Biennial has odd numbers of the 150. Sir Peter Blake’s studio has even numbers. Split 75 each. Doesn't this suggest that the border size is 10cm instead of the 5cm that some people have mentioned? When I say border I mean the white space of the paper surrounding the image.
This is the info I was sent: Paper size is 60 x 40cm – image is 50 x 30cm. Price of the print is likely to rise! Liverpool Biennial has odd numbers of the 150. Sir Peter Blake’s studio has even numbers. Split 75 each. Doesn't this suggest that the border size is 10cm instead of the 5cm that some people have mentioned? When I say border I mean the white space of the paper surrounding the image.
|
|
DrWhite
Member
Posts: 4,015
Member Since: August 2012
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by DrWhite on Mar 3, 2016 14:48:15 GMT 1, ^^^ I'll let someone else take this one - I don't wasn't to sound condescending  10cm border on one side - and image up against the edge at the other LOL 
^^^ I'll let someone else take this one - I don't wasn't to sound condescending  10cm border on one side - and image up against the edge at the other LOL 
|
|
pressman
Member
Posts: 300
Member Since: May 2015
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by pressman on Mar 3, 2016 14:53:07 GMT 1, ^^^ I'll let someone else take this one - I don't wasn't to sound condescending 10cm border on one side - and image up against the edge at the other LOL Just had to top myself LOLing in the office!
^^^ I'll let someone else take this one - I don't wasn't to sound condescending 10cm border on one side - and image up against the edge at the other LOL Just had to top myself LOLing in the office!
|
|
settingson
Member
Posts: 527
Member Since: May 2014
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by settingson on Mar 3, 2016 14:54:48 GMT 1, This is the info I was sent: Paper size is 60 x 40cm – image is 50 x 30cm. Price of the print is likely to rise! Liverpool Biennial has odd numbers of the 150. Sir Peter Blake’s studio has even numbers. Split 75 each. Doesn't this suggest that the border size is 10cm instead of the 5cm that some people have mentioned? When I say border I mean the white space of the paper surrounding the image. Easy mistake to make! The 10cm difference equates to a 5cm border all around the print, ie 5cm to each side and 5cm at the top and bottom giving the 10cm size difference in the dimensions.
This is the info I was sent: Paper size is 60 x 40cm – image is 50 x 30cm. Price of the print is likely to rise! Liverpool Biennial has odd numbers of the 150. Sir Peter Blake’s studio has even numbers. Split 75 each. Doesn't this suggest that the border size is 10cm instead of the 5cm that some people have mentioned? When I say border I mean the white space of the paper surrounding the image. Easy mistake to make! The 10cm difference equates to a 5cm border all around the print, ie 5cm to each side and 5cm at the top and bottom giving the 10cm size difference in the dimensions.
|
|
DrWhite
Member
Posts: 4,015
Member Since: August 2012
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by DrWhite on Mar 3, 2016 14:56:09 GMT 1, ^^^ perfect explanation !
^^^ perfect explanation !
|
|
|
dibbs45
Member
Posts: 3,837
Member Since: October 2012
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by dibbs45 on Mar 3, 2016 16:52:40 GMT 1, shown sold out now
shown sold out now
|
|
tomega
Member
Posts: 89
Member Since: October 2007
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by tomega on Mar 3, 2016 19:47:27 GMT 1, This is the info I was sent: Paper size is 60 x 40cm – image is 50 x 30cm. Price of the print is likely to rise! Liverpool Biennial has odd numbers of the 150. Sir Peter Blake’s studio has even numbers. Split 75 each. Doesn't this suggest that the border size is 10cm instead of the 5cm that some people have mentioned? When I say border I mean the white space of the paper surrounding the image. Ah yes indeed. Sorry my bad. Maths was never my strong point, not even basic maths (obviously).
This is the info I was sent: Paper size is 60 x 40cm – image is 50 x 30cm. Price of the print is likely to rise! Liverpool Biennial has odd numbers of the 150. Sir Peter Blake’s studio has even numbers. Split 75 each. Doesn't this suggest that the border size is 10cm instead of the 5cm that some people have mentioned? When I say border I mean the white space of the paper surrounding the image. Ah yes indeed. Sorry my bad. Maths was never my strong point, not even basic maths (obviously).
|
|
BrotherBern
Member
Posts: 407
Member Since: February 2012
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by BrotherBern on Mar 3, 2016 21:09:46 GMT 1, Doesn't this suggest that the border size is 10cm instead of the 5cm that some people have mentioned? When I say border I mean the white space of the paper surrounding the image. Ah yes indeed. Sorry my bad. Maths was never my strong point, not even basic maths (obviously). Sides = 5cm border each side = 10cm + 30cm image size = 40cm
ditto for height 10cm + 50cm image = 60cm
i must admit the photo showing the print framed does make the border look wider, but I received an email stating the image and paper sizes.
Doesn't this suggest that the border size is 10cm instead of the 5cm that some people have mentioned? When I say border I mean the white space of the paper surrounding the image. Ah yes indeed. Sorry my bad. Maths was never my strong point, not even basic maths (obviously). Sides = 5cm border each side = 10cm + 30cm image size = 40cm ditto for height 10cm + 50cm image = 60cm i must admit the photo showing the print framed does make the border look wider, but I received an email stating the image and paper sizes.
|
|
tomega
Member
Posts: 89
Member Since: October 2007
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by tomega on Mar 3, 2016 23:15:27 GMT 1, Ah yes indeed. Sorry my bad. Maths was never my strong point, not even basic maths (obviously). Sides = 5cm border each side = 10cm + 30cm image size = 40cm ditto for height 10cm + 50cm image = 60cm i must admit the photo showing the print framed does make the border look wider, but I received an email stating the image and paper sizes. Cheers BrotherBern. I can reason with that now but for some reason I just couldn't see it. I was looking at it next to Peter Blake and thinking 'That image isn't much wider than the width of his head' which of course then made all the white space look very wide (to me at least). Obviously my spatial awareness and basic calculation skills are getting worse with old age. Can't even say I had been drinking as I hadn't. In Fast Show style, I'll just get my coat.
Ah yes indeed. Sorry my bad. Maths was never my strong point, not even basic maths (obviously). Sides = 5cm border each side = 10cm + 30cm image size = 40cm ditto for height 10cm + 50cm image = 60cm i must admit the photo showing the print framed does make the border look wider, but I received an email stating the image and paper sizes. Cheers BrotherBern. I can reason with that now but for some reason I just couldn't see it. I was looking at it next to Peter Blake and thinking 'That image isn't much wider than the width of his head' which of course then made all the white space look very wide (to me at least). Obviously my spatial awareness and basic calculation skills are getting worse with old age. Can't even say I had been drinking as I hadn't. In Fast Show style, I'll just get my coat.
|
|
BrotherBern
Member
Posts: 407
Member Since: February 2012
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by BrotherBern on Mar 3, 2016 23:22:38 GMT 1, Sides = 5cm border each side = 10cm + 30cm image size = 40cm ditto for height 10cm + 50cm image = 60cm i must admit the photo showing the print framed does make the border look wider, but I received an email stating the image and paper sizes. Cheers BrotherBern. I can reason with that now but for some reason I just couldn't see it. I was looking at it next to Peter Blake and thinking 'That image isn't much wider than the width of his head' which of course then made all the white space look very wide (to me at least). Obviously my spatial awareness and basic calculation skills are getting worse with old age. Can't even say I had been drinking as I hadn't. In Fast Show style, I'll just get my coat. It does look wider, I guess I will have to wait and see when it arrives.
Sides = 5cm border each side = 10cm + 30cm image size = 40cm ditto for height 10cm + 50cm image = 60cm i must admit the photo showing the print framed does make the border look wider, but I received an email stating the image and paper sizes. Cheers BrotherBern. I can reason with that now but for some reason I just couldn't see it. I was looking at it next to Peter Blake and thinking 'That image isn't much wider than the width of his head' which of course then made all the white space look very wide (to me at least). Obviously my spatial awareness and basic calculation skills are getting worse with old age. Can't even say I had been drinking as I hadn't. In Fast Show style, I'll just get my coat. It does look wider, I guess I will have to wait and see when it arrives.
|
|
argiebaji
Member
Posts: 2,853
Member Since: June 2008
|
|
|
T-Bro
Member
Posts: 1,470
Member Since: April 2006
|
agreed - and much more iconic.
|
|
DrWhite
Member
Posts: 4,015
Member Since: August 2012
|
Agreed - that's a bit "meh" for £2.4k
|
|
iamzero
Member
Posts: 8,487
Member Since: May 2011
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by iamzero on Mar 4, 2016 14:53:35 GMT 1, There aren't many galleries that have control of the price of Peter Blakes stuff it's all dictated by CCA Galleries.
There aren't many galleries that have control of the price of Peter Blakes stuff it's all dictated by CCA Galleries.
|
|
DrWhite
Member
Posts: 4,015
Member Since: August 2012
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by DrWhite on Mar 5, 2016 13:21:32 GMT 1, Did anyone ask when these are shipping ? I'm off on hols shortly & don't want it lying around in the postal system or being used by a courier to stack fridges on until I return to collect it !
Did anyone ask when these are shipping ? I'm off on hols shortly & don't want it lying around in the postal system or being used by a courier to stack fridges on until I return to collect it !
|
|
DashingD
Member
Posts: 120
Member Since: June 2013
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by DashingD on Mar 5, 2016 13:31:58 GMT 1, From the order e-mail:
" Dispatch We aim to dispatch all orders within 10 working days. If you haven't received your purchase within 15 working days from ordering, please contact us."
So hopefully it'll arrive before you go away. Not sure who the courier is that costs £25, though.
From the order e-mail:
" Dispatch We aim to dispatch all orders within 10 working days. If you haven't received your purchase within 15 working days from ordering, please contact us."
So hopefully it'll arrive before you go away. Not sure who the courier is that costs £25, though.
|
|
DrWhite
Member
Posts: 4,015
Member Since: August 2012
|
Peter Blake Dazzle ed150, by DrWhite on Mar 5, 2016 13:37:18 GMT 1, From the order e-mail: " Dispatch We aim to dispatch all orders within 10 working days. If you haven't received your purchase within 15 working days from ordering, please contact us." So hopefully it'll arrive before you go away. Not sure who the courier is that costs £25, though.
Thank you 
From the order e-mail: " Dispatch We aim to dispatch all orders within 10 working days. If you haven't received your purchase within 15 working days from ordering, please contact us." So hopefully it'll arrive before you go away. Not sure who the courier is that costs £25, though. Thank you 
|
|