|
|
Post by blobbydon on Feb 21, 2012 15:39:35 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by craigf on Feb 21, 2012 16:47:55 GMT 1
Yep, that one isn't by Banksy, was just handed out to ppl in the queue |
|
confused2
2 Star Member
We are the music makers and we are the dreamers of dreams
Posts: 442
|
Post by confused2 on Mar 22, 2012 23:23:40 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Mar 22, 2012 23:29:24 GMT 1
Also been cut down if his and the COA measurements are right.
|
|
Wearology
Assistant Moderator 
Born & Raised In NYC
Posts: 1,727
|
Post by Wearology on Mar 23, 2012 1:23:01 GMT 1
The one on the top looks very dodgy the seller has a low rating and a lot of spelling mistakes. The one on the bottom looks more legit but cash or bank transfer only - I don't like only those 2 options.
|
|
|
|
Post by lifeonwalls on Mar 23, 2012 4:29:27 GMT 1
Nice catch. Odds of those COAs being signed on the same day = not good.
|
|
|
|
Post by forbiddenlove on Mar 25, 2012 19:15:57 GMT 1
yea not looking good.
beware of that auction i once nearly got burned by a girl from the same area! photoshopped images.
|
|
|
|
Post by richskara on Mar 29, 2012 13:57:35 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by balibob on Mar 29, 2012 14:24:32 GMT 1
^ WTF is that ebay listing. Haven't laughed so much in ages.
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Mar 29, 2012 14:34:31 GMT 1
that frame job isnt even worth £11 ;D |
|
|
|
Post by fingerz on Mar 29, 2012 19:36:38 GMT 1
it will be hotdog , it's a strange colour ......  The print is supplied framed in a complimentary balck frame |
|
|
|
Post by fingerz on Mar 30, 2012 19:59:24 GMT 1
|
|
jonti
3 Star Member
Posts: 716
|
Post by jonti on Mar 30, 2012 20:28:54 GMT 1
Yea it winds me up that people don't want to pay a few % Paypal fees on a print that they will be making thousands of pounds over what they originally paid for it. Reminds me of an ex who bought a Turf War a few years ago and the buyer asked for an echeque as the fees for him would be about £20 less than instant payment after making a £1590 profit ! |
|
|
|
Post by damien123 on Mar 30, 2012 20:32:15 GMT 1
have they got a vlh in background? looks very small
|
|
|
|
Post by craigf on Mar 30, 2012 20:53:40 GMT 1
have they got a vlh in background? looks very small It's their pc screen rather than a print |
|
|
|
Post by fingerz on Mar 30, 2012 21:54:48 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by damien123 on Mar 30, 2012 22:29:05 GMT 1
have they got a vlh in background? looks very small It's their pc screen rather than a print oh yeah thanks, my bad eyesight. had no idea it was a screen :-) |
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Mar 30, 2012 22:51:07 GMT 1
Just notify eBay as if they state they will not accept paypal eBay will pull the listing ;D |
|
|
|
Post by joevalentino on Mar 30, 2012 23:09:42 GMT 1
POW wasnt in Commercial Street in 2004
Also if it is unsigned, why has the seller blocked out 2 portions of the print?
|
|
|
|
Post by craigf on Mar 31, 2012 7:36:57 GMT 1
Also if it is unsigned, why has the seller blocked out 2 portions of the print? I decided to ask them that, let's see if I get a response  |
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Mar 31, 2012 7:53:12 GMT 1
Is it me or has that GWB got a reflective sheen in the second photo like the posters do that you get printed from photo shops?
|
|
confused2
2 Star Member
We are the music makers and we are the dreamers of dreams
Posts: 442
|
Post by confused2 on Mar 31, 2012 12:59:27 GMT 1
Looks like the seller is taking a picture of a blank piece of paper then photoshopping the GWB and Golf Sale images onto the paper.
The images are just too crisp.
|
|
|
|
Post by fingerz on Mar 31, 2012 13:29:43 GMT 1
funny how the seller say's they have only just started using the account when its been active since '08 ...... lol
|
|
|
|
Post by babydave on Mar 31, 2012 13:43:54 GMT 1
Ive just noticed that the Golf Sale must be a different one to the one this person "sold" earlier. The dates on the COAs are different. The current listing has July1st 2011 on the COA and the other one has a January 2012 date.... Either this seller was lucky getting a handful of Golf Sales or, as everyone here knows, IT'S DODGY AS FUDGE!!!!
If you're gonna try and fleece people then why not use a bit of common sense?!?! Sheesh!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by babydave on Mar 31, 2012 14:26:17 GMT 1
I've asked the seller if the two sales are of the same print and they have replied saying that the new listing is due to the buyer not paying. I've now asked why the COAs differ....awaiting a response....
|
|
|
|
Post by babydave on Mar 31, 2012 14:45:16 GMT 1
Well here we are.....  ******************** Dear , Yes the old listing had just a COA pic I had placed up, this pic is my recent taking. Not including paper trail provenance. I am not the buyer from new, this might put you off but sorry im not willing to give the POW reference until sold and paid, I wish you could see my inbox with how many people are asking me for all details e.g the number of the edition and closer pic's of the signature and also photo copies of the COA, ive had past experiance of duplicates and im not keen on letting this type of thing happen again (nothing against you). Thanks for your question, regards. - kazzy01234 ********************** Ive now asked for clarification about people asking for close ups of the sig as the item being sold is unsigned.... Well at least this is passing my afternoon |
|
|
|
Post by babydave on Mar 31, 2012 14:56:57 GMT 1
My reply was along the lines of "dont get smart!".... Customer service at its best.
|
|
|
|
Post by babydave on Mar 31, 2012 16:01:14 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by rottenredrooster on Mar 31, 2012 16:06:07 GMT 1
The first listing I saw had stolen the images from another golf sale that was on bidding at the same time (a few days ago).
It looked as if they had brightens the photo of the print and the COA in that one.
|
|
|
|
Post by fingerz on Mar 31, 2012 16:09:24 GMT 1
the sellers got the blek back up aswell now ..... crazy
|
|
