|
|
Post by johnnyh on Feb 7, 2012 19:08:09 GMT 1
I actually think this piece is quite good and clever. Not the greatest piece of street art and I do wish whoever had not destroyed the orig piece but this is quite a good piss take.
Think the whole destroying Banksy's is pointless but taking the mick is fine.
|
|
|
|
Post by illu2305 on Feb 7, 2012 20:43:35 GMT 1
thanks for the head up
|
|
mayhem
3 Star Member
 
Posts: 655
|
Post by mayhem on Feb 7, 2012 21:36:12 GMT 1
I think its an insult to put anyone's name too it.
|
|
|
|
Post by deputydawg on Feb 7, 2012 22:38:40 GMT 1
What a surprise a joke at our esteemed ruling elites expense is not liked here - but then what is the point of street art if it's not Banksy?
|
|
mayhem
3 Star Member
 
Posts: 655
|
Post by mayhem on Feb 7, 2012 22:57:19 GMT 1
If your going to make a point. Make it. What makes me think this is a wonderful piece of art? Nothing. Like playing the piano badly(when you are an accomplished musician-Tommy Cooper for instance), it takes talent. Not sure someone is having fun with this litter but its by no Master of Art.
|
|
|
|
Post by deputydawg on Feb 8, 2012 0:45:37 GMT 1
I made my point but I can reiterate if you like
1. It maybe a poor image, poorly executed but at least it's having a pop at something that needs to be done (obviously this is a forum for buying and selling urban art so politics, the history of street art and expression aren't necessarily ideal bed fellows)
2. Banksy pieces do not have a divine right to go untouched, whether something good or bad takes its place that's the street for you.
I hope that helps
|
|
mayhem
3 Star Member
 
Posts: 655
|
Post by mayhem on Feb 8, 2012 2:12:57 GMT 1
Fair comment dawg!
|
|
sean
3 Star Member
 
Posts: 771
|
Post by sean on Apr 25, 2013 19:48:37 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Cornishcrayon on Apr 26, 2013 0:01:34 GMT 1
How come I don't get the link on a pad ?
No worries
|
|
anorak
1 Star Member
Posts: 19
|
Post by anorak on Apr 26, 2013 11:01:25 GMT 1
the article on sabotage times is 2 years old!
|
|