|
|
Post by skylarkin on Jun 14, 2011 13:01:20 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Jun 14, 2011 13:04:54 GMT 1
oops. Bet that argument went on for a while.
|
|
|
|
Post by sacked on Jun 14, 2011 13:10:04 GMT 1
Oh dear.
|
|
|
|
Post by murdock on Jun 14, 2011 13:17:39 GMT 1
Not cool...
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Jun 14, 2011 13:22:43 GMT 1
ooooo funny, although he comes across a bit of a dick , hate arguments in public never any need and in front of a camera, ? He should had laughed it off would had been alot better way to act
|
|
Daniel Silk
Founder 
URBAN ART ASSOCIATION
Posts: 21,606
Location: UK
|
Post by Daniel Silk on Jun 14, 2011 13:28:57 GMT 1
What was wrong with what she said?  |
|
|
|
Post by otto71 on Jun 14, 2011 13:30:52 GMT 1
I'm sure when they got home Shep got a good smackdown!
Shep isn't getting any nookie for some time!
|
|
|
|
Post by shakey1181 on Jun 14, 2011 13:32:26 GMT 1
i'm getting a 'content not availble' message - what gives?
|
|
|
|
Post by thebigboss on Jun 14, 2011 13:47:23 GMT 1
|
|
mgk1
3 Star Member
Posts: 897
|
Post by mgk1 on Jun 14, 2011 13:49:49 GMT 1
What was wrong with what she said? she essentially said he never puts stuff out on the street and always gets his team to do it if i was shep i'd be pretty pissed at that comment too seeing as he does seem to still put quite a lot of stuff out on the street |
|
|
|
Post by rowan on Jun 14, 2011 13:51:40 GMT 1
f**k Jesus... ha ha!
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Jun 14, 2011 13:52:43 GMT 1
wouldn't read too much into it unless you were there and saw what really went down - could just be camera tricks for entertainment purposes now... |
|
|
|
Post by Karl Read on Jun 14, 2011 13:54:04 GMT 1
Well he was in a no win situation. If he says yes, there could be legal implications, if he says no, he's not sticking to what he says he's about. Hence why he smiled and kept quiet, she opens her mouth and hence the anger.Can understand why, prob shouldnt of done it on camera though.
|
|
Oimag
Media 
Outside In Magazine
Posts: 770
|
Post by Oimag on Jun 14, 2011 14:02:01 GMT 1
in the vid they say he got angry because they said it ruined his street cred but I dont think thats the reason he got angry at all. I think its to do with the whole legal implication side.
|
|
|
|
Post by artylang on Jun 14, 2011 14:21:45 GMT 1
Looks like we got another Chris Brown here...
|
|
|
|
Post by balibob on Jun 14, 2011 14:24:47 GMT 1
If you like an artist and you see a piece of work in the street, you kind of think that somewhere along the line they would of been involved in actually putting it there. We kind of know that a lot of artists have help, especially on big pieces, but its sort of like Banksy cutting a stencil and then sending someone else out to spray it, or Invader knocking up some tiles and someone else sticking them up. Not quite right imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by connecta1 on Jun 14, 2011 14:26:28 GMT 1
...I reckon she said 'a long time ago' to deflect potential legal issues, but he's mad because it's ended-up sounding like his crew does all the work and that he's not 'hands on' these days.
Either way, a funny domestic...
|
|
|
|
Post by shakey1181 on Jun 14, 2011 14:36:24 GMT 1
the most nothing piece of all time...
|
|
|
|
Post by artylang on Jun 14, 2011 14:55:49 GMT 1
the most nothing piece of all time... i know right, his work is still soulless with or without helpers |
|
|
|
Post by Michael Jacob on Jun 14, 2011 15:18:11 GMT 1
Great video! Cant believe he kept talking to her that way while the camera was rolling.
|
|
Daniel Silk
Founder
URBAN ART ASSOCIATION
Posts: 21,606
Location: UK
|
Post by Daniel Silk on Jun 14, 2011 15:21:38 GMT 1
Was she talking about herself rather than Shep?
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Jun 14, 2011 16:18:03 GMT 1
bang out of order to reply to her like that shoulda just ignored it
|
|
|
|
Post by highinla on Jun 14, 2011 16:25:01 GMT 1
Ha... this is great! Good find.
|
|
|
|
Post by Philippe on Jun 14, 2011 16:37:37 GMT 1
That was good, the question the camera guy asked was so asinine, he was just surprised she would even entertain a response non the less call him out.
|
|
|
|
Post by warmgun on Jun 14, 2011 16:42:57 GMT 1
Oppps!
|
|
|
|
Post by gentlemental on Jun 14, 2011 17:09:48 GMT 1
tmz - and the likes...just reek of stink from the most vile, manipulative, scum of the earth evilness, anything and everything they can use to make a "story".
|
|
|
|
Post by curiousgeorge on Jun 14, 2011 18:09:21 GMT 1
wouldn't read too much into it unless you were there and saw what really went down - could just be camera tricks for entertainment purposes now... This! Though that said it was still painful viewing |
|
|
|
Post by coach on Jun 14, 2011 19:47:27 GMT 1
Hmmm! Mountains and molehills imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by jcmerrick on Jun 14, 2011 20:36:03 GMT 1
yeah coach, this whole edit is 95% irritating voice over. You cant even be sure what question was asked. Internet rubbish.
|
|
|
|
Post by happyshopper on Jun 14, 2011 20:47:28 GMT 1
Horrible manipulation of the footage for effect.
Clearly in a airport, he's tired and get angry at her answer... Big deal.
|
|
