|
|
Post by seidbereit on May 17, 2008 14:27:01 GMT 1
Well you are Hush aren't you UAC. Its not only here you big yourself up is it & such a shame that you choose these tactics when it really isn't necessary given how nice and popular your work is. What are you whittering on about? Number of times you've posted the same thing = 2 Number of times you've backed it up with anything = 0 |
|
|
|
Post by romanywg on May 17, 2008 14:45:02 GMT 1
Why on earth would Hush need to big up his own work? Seems he's popular enough without wasting his own time when he's preparing for a show. What's your beef lovingit?
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on May 17, 2008 15:10:57 GMT 1
I was asking UAC a question which he didn't answer, I then asked him again following his sideways response.
didn't think it would be long before you popped up romany, if you care to read my post I made exactly the same point as you, Hush does not need to big his on work up because its good enough to carry itself.
What makes you so sure he's not hush eh? I may not have backed my QUESTION up with evidence so maybe, being so clever, seibereit you could tell me why you are so sure my suspicions are incorrect.
|
|
quackers
1 Star Member
Registered 2007
Posts: 125
|
Post by quackers on May 17, 2008 15:24:04 GMT 1
Red Geisha for me every day.... it looks amazing!!
Well done Hush.
|
|
|
|
Post by seidbereit on May 17, 2008 15:37:37 GMT 1
I was asking UAC a question which he didn't answer, I then asked him again following his sideways response. didn't think it would be long before you popped up romany, if you care to read my post I made exactly the same point as you, Hush does not need to big his on work up because its good enough to carry itself. What makes you so sure he's not hush eh? I may not have backed my QUESTION up with evidence so maybe, being so clever, seibereit you could tell me why you are so sure my suspicions are incorrect. Load of bollocks. Neither of your two posts asked a question, instead they made accusatory statements. a) UAC you actually are Hush aren't you. b) Well you are Hush aren't you UAC. The fact they're worded as questions (without ?s) doesn't make them less accusatory and certainly doesn't put them into the class of friendly enquiries. I don't have to prove why I'm so certain your suspicions are wrong, if you want to make stupid comments then you should be prepared to back them up. |
|
|
|
Post by Guest on May 17, 2008 16:05:08 GMT 1
So big deal I missed a question mark but both posts contain the words aren't you which begs a response
You are being suckered seibereit and will be the one who realises you've made stupid comments.
I do take your comments onboard seibereit and I will try harder with my grammar and punctuation but for me honesty and integrity comes first.
|
|
|
|
Post by seidbereit on May 17, 2008 16:08:27 GMT 1
So big deal I missed a question mark but both posts contain the words aren't you which begs a response You are being suckered seibereit and will be the one who realises you've made stupid comments. I do take your comments onboard seibereit and I will try harder with my grammar and punctuation but for me honesty and integrity comes first. Look, lovingit... your "questions" only beg a response because they are attached to an accusation, which you STILL haven't backed up. End of story. |
|
|
|
Post by Guest on May 17, 2008 16:11:29 GMT 1
Erm, when all is said and done, who cares?
Mmmm - pretty pictures.....
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on May 17, 2008 16:26:20 GMT 1
Ok for your benefit seidbereit
UAC are you Hush?
|
|
|
|
Post by bullet on May 17, 2008 17:29:34 GMT 1
Opus, what is the price of the copyright originals?
J
|
|
tfat
1 Star Member
Posts: 31
|
Post by tfat on May 17, 2008 18:08:41 GMT 1
Ok for your benefit seidbereit UAC are you Hush? No no no... Uac is Banksy... Who isof course Nick Walker  |
|
|
|
Post by Guest on May 17, 2008 18:37:02 GMT 1
To avoid any confusion, I'd like to confirm that I'm neither Banksy nor Nick Walker nor UAC, I'm an Essex based bloke who is on holiday (on the Costa del Sol naturally) on the 29th May.
If you were me how would you go about getting a red geisha? Ta
|
|
|
|
Post by mainartery on May 17, 2008 18:37:13 GMT 1
LMAO, I know, how many times do we have to read the same old stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by romanywg on May 17, 2008 18:40:50 GMT 1
What makes you so sure he's not hush eh? I may not have backed my QUESTION up with evidence so maybe, being so clever, seibereit you could tell me why you are so sure my suspicions are incorrect. There's probably as much chance of uac being Hush as there is of you being Photobank! |
|
Keeping It Council
2 Star Member
Working Class Hero looking for Council Estate Princess
Posts: 346
|
Post by Keeping It Council on May 17, 2008 19:12:27 GMT 1
Opus, what is the price of the copyright originals? J Between £1000 - £3000 give or take a quid! ;D A |
|
|
|
Post by bullet on May 17, 2008 19:19:14 GMT 1
are they going to be on wood /canvas? Size?
would be good to know whats going to be there
|
|
ollys
1 Star Member
Posts: 53
|
Post by ollys on May 17, 2008 19:23:07 GMT 1
How many pieces in the show?
|
|
Keeping It Council
2 Star Member
Working Class Hero looking for Council Estate Princess
Posts: 346
|
Post by Keeping It Council on May 17, 2008 19:26:23 GMT 1
are they going to be on wood /canvas? Size? would be good to know whats going to be there Mainly Canvas but a few wood pieces, paper pieces and a lighting piece! ;D A |
|
Keeping It Council
2 Star Member
Working Class Hero looking for Council Estate Princess
Posts: 346
|
Post by Keeping It Council on May 17, 2008 19:27:35 GMT 1
How many pieces in the show? Roughly 16 from each artist not including editions! A |
|
|
|
Post by jam on May 19, 2008 8:53:36 GMT 1
Hush, or shall I call you 'stikadude', or 'uac' or was it 'mainartery'? All these names and personalities are to confusing for me and I honestly don't know how you keep them straight. Anyhow, it seems you've been outed on WK as having all the names above posting from the same IP address, so it would be safe to assume that is the case here as well, wouldn't it? Clearly you are nothing more than a charlatan artist who makes his mark by thieving other established artist's styles. Add to that an inept market manipulating effort by creating multiple user IDs and talking up your own art and praising... wait for it... yourself! It seems obvious to me that you are here for no other reason than taking advantage of this forum/community. As if all that effort of hyping your own art wasn't enough, you had to go to the lengths of bashing anyone who implied there was something sinister going on with your posts. Pretty appalling behavior fella. Personally, I will hereon refer to you as 'Flush', as that is the sound currently being heard as your 15 minutes are circling the drain. Ta
|
|
|
|
Post by moleman on May 19, 2008 9:40:35 GMT 1
all advertising is good advertising it saves having to right bump so much
good work keep it up
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt-lock on May 19, 2008 9:43:02 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by goffy on May 19, 2008 10:00:31 GMT 1
I was accused by Silky of having 3 different accounts/names on here because they came from the same IP Address, apparently it could be a shared work address. I have only ever had one and still have it, so don't use that as a reason to out somebody.
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on May 19, 2008 10:15:07 GMT 1
geisha graff needs no hyping it's a quality piece
|
|
|
|
Post by Opus Underground on May 19, 2008 10:45:21 GMT 1
What a load of rubbish to wake up to on a Monday morning I have personally spoken to two of these members in the past and neither is Hush! I have also spoken with Hush this morning and he is very disappointed by the way a minority have tried to tarnish a very positive thread. He also no longer plans to use the forums which in the long run is a bad thing for everyone.
Hush is an incredibly talented artist who has won around a number of critics with the quality of his art and he has no reason to waste his time by playing around as different people on an art forum!
Jam you are clearly not a fan of Hush's work from the tone and the malicious nature of your post but I would request you do a little more research before throwing about accusations!
Now lets get back to the art and away from the cloak and dagger!
A
|
|
|
|
Post by timba82 on May 19, 2008 10:53:07 GMT 1
What a load of rubbish to wake up to on a Monday morning I have personally spoken to two of these members in the past and neither is Hush! I have also spoken with Hush this morning and he is very disappointed by the way a minority have tried to tarnish a very positive thread. He also no longer plans to use the forums which in the long run is a bad thing for everyone. Hush is an incredibly talented artist who has won around a number of critics with the quality of his art and he has no reason to waste his time by playing around as different people on an art forum! Jam you are clearly not a fan of Hush's work from the tone and the malicious nature of your post but I would request you do a little more research before throwing about accusations! Now lets get back to the art and away from the cloak and dagger! A gutted that a minority have ruined it for the majority. complete f**king morons!! A - please try and bring Hush round to not abandon the forum - it would be a huge loss. |
|
|
|
Post by Oliver Winconek on May 19, 2008 10:55:31 GMT 1
Hush, or shall I call you 'stikadude', or 'uac' or was it 'mainartery'? All these names and personalities are to confusing for me and I honestly don't know how you keep them straight. Anyhow, it seems you've been outed on WK as having all the names above posting from the same IP address, so it would be safe to assume that is the case here as well, wouldn't it? Clearly you are nothing more than a charlatan artist who makes his mark by thieving other established artist's styles. Add to that an inept market manipulating effort by creating multiple user IDs and talking up your own art and praising... wait for it... yourself! It seems obvious to me that you are here for no other reason than taking advantage of this forum/community. As if all that effort of hyping your own art wasn't enough, you had to go to the lengths of bashing anyone who implied there was something sinister going on with your posts. Pretty appalling behavior fella. Personally, I will hereon refer to you as 'Flush', as that is the sound currently being heard as your 15 minutes are circling the drain. Ta You seriously need to wake up and smell the spraypaint. Why on earth would you try and taint Hush's reputation with your unfounded accusations? Jealousy is a terrible thing.... |
|
|
|
Post by sacked on May 19, 2008 11:04:05 GMT 1
Why would he bother to 'up' his work ,when its quite obvious he has enough fans to do it for him !Now ecause of the bulls**t he will no longer be letting us know what going on in the world of Hush.There alway seems to be people on this forum who enjoy spoiling it for the rest of us.spouting about things they 'know' but dont know !!
|
|
|
|
Post by spirit on May 19, 2008 11:29:29 GMT 1
I have no axe to grind here, I really like the prints and can't see any reason for "insider" hyping of the work. However I would like to see an explanation for the shared ip address...
|
|
|
|
Post by bodysnatcher on May 19, 2008 11:43:36 GMT 1
I think whats important here is to not let the baseless attempts of a sabotage be a detriment to the relationship of the event. If the disputant doesn't realise how poorly they acted here then they're surely not even the type of mind you originally intended to inspire with your art.
I think if many of the people hitting this event are just as excited as I am, which i know they are; then they're not going to allow one raw prawn the satisfaction...
Think I'd have to narrow it down the the Geisha Girls and Decks for my favorite pieces, damn I can't wait!
Si
|
|
