|
|
Post by blacksy on May 18, 2008 20:04:57 GMT 1
As a collective we're still somewhat short of information/conspiracy theories on Miss Bugs, as an artist/artists.
Having checked wikipedia (cos it's all true on there) i can't seem to find much out about MB.
Let me know what you know!
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on May 18, 2008 20:16:12 GMT 1
I think with their help we've manage to establish that the rumour that they are a well known artist working under another name is just that, a rumour, it has no basis in fact.
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on May 18, 2008 20:17:48 GMT 1
Tony Hart
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on May 18, 2008 20:18:18 GMT 1
Here's what I've gathered;
1) they may or not be an artist in disguise (though evidence points strongly towards 'not')
2) banksy may or may not have bought one of their pieces at a show
3) people like to treat both these points as solid truth, particularly when selling their stuff
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on May 18, 2008 20:52:51 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by fragile on May 18, 2008 23:12:40 GMT 1
miss + paul insect = miss bugs.
I posted an interview with miss a few weeks back.
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on May 19, 2008 1:23:31 GMT 1
miss + paul insect = miss bugs. I posted an interview with miss a few weeks back. according to the internet, mr miss bugs born 1979 paul insect born 1971 no match |
|
|
|
Post by Montubu7 on May 19, 2008 1:28:31 GMT 1
Here's what I've gathered; 1) they may or not be an artist in disguise (though evidence points strongly towards 'not') 2) banksy may or may not have bought one of their pieces at a show 3) people like to treat both these points as solid truth, particularly when selling their stuff For what its worth i agree with the above. It seems Bugs aint either Banksy, Insect or hirst. They may have sold some work to Banksy once ( does his c .card say banksy on it?) They have done some work with a hirst background. They have done some work similar to paul insect work. They seem to have been around before in a previous disguise as a smaller time artist who learnt from their original run.. |
|
|
|
Post by Heavyconsumer on May 19, 2008 2:11:31 GMT 1
I don't get why people give a monkey's about all the conspiracy theory nonsense. I like their art, so I try to buy it (no mean feat of course!). If you like it great, if you don't great. Is there really any need for playing into the salesmen's hands? None that I can see. I like to think their work is selling at a premium because it's distinctively theirs and it's very limited in volume/availability, not because people are hoping they turn out to be a known and highly valued artist of a different name.
|
|
|
|
Post by themightyreds on May 19, 2008 11:44:00 GMT 1
They seem to have been around before in a previous disguise as a smaller time artist who learnt from their original run.. as who? |
|
